본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

co-parenting-messages

Write calm, businesslike co-parenting messages that keep the focus on the kids and stay out of the old conflict — for scheduling, expenses, decisions, and hard topics. Use when asked to write a message to my co-parent, respond to my ex about the kids, co-parenting communication help, or how to reply without a fight. Produces a message drafted in a neutral, child-centered tone (the 'BIFF'-style brief/informative/friendly/firm approach), the bait removed, a clear ask or answer, and a note on documentation — steering away from anything that escalates. Not legal advice.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.5 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Co-Parenting Messages

Co-parenting communication goes wrong when old relationship dynamics leak into logistics — a simple scheduling text becomes a fight. This drafts messages that stay businesslike and child-centered: brief, factual, and firm, with the emotional bait stripped out, so you address the actual issue (schedule, expense, decision) without reigniting conflict — and keep a clean record while you're at it.

What This Skill Produces

  • A calm, child-centered draft — the message written in a neutral, businesslike tone focused on the kids and the logistics
  • Bait removed — provocations, blame, and digs (theirs and yours) filtered out so you don't escalate
  • A clear ask or answer — one concrete request, decision, or response, not a rehash of grievances
  • Boundary phrasing — how to hold a line (say no, decline a topic) firmly and politely
  • A documentation note — keeping communication on the record (a co-parenting app or written channel) for clarity and, if needed, proceedings

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • The topic — schedule, pickup/dropoff, expenses, a parenting decision, or a sensitive issue
  • What was said — their message, if you're replying (paste it)
  • Your goal — arrange something, answer, hold a boundary, or de-escalate
  • The dynamic — high-conflict, cooperative-ish, or somewhere between
  • Any constraints — a custody agreement/order terms relevant to the ask

Framework: Brief, Informative, Friendly, Firm

  1. Center the child, not the history. Frame everything around the kids' needs and logistics; leave the relationship out of it.
  2. Strip the bait. Remove blame, sarcasm, and reactions to their provocations — responding to bait is how logistics become fights. Answer only the substance.
  3. Keep it brief and factual (BIFF). Brief, informative, friendly, and firm — enough to convey the point, not an essay that invites a rebuttal war.
  4. Make one clear ask/answer. State the request, decision, or response plainly, with specifics (dates, amounts) — reduce back-and-forth.
  5. Hold boundaries calmly. Decline off-topic or hostile threads politely and redirect to the child-focused matter.
  6. Keep the record. Prefer written/app-based channels and a factual tone — useful for clarity now and if it ever matters legally.

Output Format

Co-parenting message: topic [x] · goal [y] · tone: [de-escalate]

Draft

[Brief, factual, child-centered message: the specific ask/answer, dates/amounts as needed, warm-but-firm, no bait, no blame.]

What I removed: [the digs/reactions filtered out]. Boundary line (if needed): "[polite decline + redirect]". Keep on record: [written/app channel; factual tone].

Not legal advice. For custody/legal disputes, follow your agreement or order and consult a family-law professional.

Quality Checks

  • Tone is neutral, businesslike, and child-centered
  • Provocations/blame (theirs and yours) are stripped out
  • Contains one clear ask or answer with specifics
  • Holds any needed boundary politely and firmly
  • Notes keeping communication on the record
  • Avoids anything that escalates; flags not-legal-advice

Anti-Patterns

  • Taking the bait and firing back.
  • Rehashing the relationship instead of the logistics.
  • An essay that invites a point-by-point war.
  • Vague asks that cause more back-and-forth.
  • Hostile "documentation" written to score points rather than resolve.

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Help me reply to my ex about swapping this weekend without it turning into a fight."
  • "Write a calm message asking my co-parent to split a school expense."
  • "My ex sent a nasty text about pickup — help me respond neutrally."
  • "How do I tell my co-parent no to a schedule change, politely but firmly?"
  • "Rewrite this message so it's child-focused and not combative."

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

mohitagw15856의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고