본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

college-cost

Compute what a degree will actually cost — sticker minus real aid, inflated per year, split into cash and loans, with the loan's decade-long monthly tail made visible before enrollment instead of after. Use when asked what will college really cost, compare these two offers' real prices, how much loan payment after graduation, or is this school affordable. Produces the all-in number from the script, the offer-letter decode (grants vs loans untangled), the monthly-tail reality check, and the two-school comparison.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md5.6 KB
  • scripts/college_cost.py3.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

College Cost Skill

The two numbers that matter — the true all-in cost, and the monthly payment for the decade after — appear nowhere on the marketing or, tellingly, the financial-aid letter, which routinely blends grants (free) with loans (very much not) into one cheerful "award." This skill computes both numbers: net cost per year with aid honestly sorted, inflated forward (tuition outruns CPI), split into cash and borrowed, and the borrowed part converted into the graduate's first decade of monthly reality. Two offers become comparable the moment both are run through it.

What This Skill Produces

  • The all-in number — net 4-year cost, cash vs. borrowed, from the script
  • The offer decode — the award letter's lines sorted: grants/scholarships (free) vs. loans (repaid) vs. work-study (earned) — the blend untangled
  • The monthly tail — the post-graduation payment, term, and total interest, stated next to a starting-salary reality check
  • The comparison — two+ schools on identical assumptions, which the letters never are

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • The sticker — full cost of attendance (tuition + room/board + fees, not tuition alone — the letter's fine print has it)
  • The aid, sorted — the award letter's actual lines; anything ambiguous gets decoded ("award" ≠ grant until proven), and renewal conditions noted (GPA floors, year-one-only grants — the classic bait)
  • The family math — what's payable in cash per year without borrowing; the gap is the loan share
  • The candidate schools — for comparisons, each letter, same treatment

Programmatic Helper

python3 scripts/college_cost.py --sticker 32000 --aid 14000
python3 scripts/college_cost.py --sticker 32000 --aid 14000 --loan-share 60 --loan-apr 6.5 --json

Deterministic. Defaults: 4% cost inflation, 4 years, 50% loan share at 6.5% over 10 years — all overridable; the true-all-in line includes the loan interest the sticker never mentions.

Framework: The Honest-Number Rules

  1. Sort the award letter before believing it: grants and scholarships reduce cost; loans defer it with interest; work-study is a job. Letters present all three as "aid" — the decode re-sorts, and the net price is what remains after only the free money.
  2. Renewal conditions are the letter's fine print trap: a year-one grant that needs a 3.5 GPA, or doesn't renew at all, makes year one's net price a teaser — the model runs the conservative case (aid as-guaranteed) beside the hopeful one and shows the spread.
  3. The monthly tail is the decision's true unit: $454/month for ten years means something a $79,887 total doesn't — the output states it next to typical starting salaries for the intended field (as a sanity band, not a prophecy), because the loan-to-income ratio is the affordability question.
  4. The fifth-year risk is a real input: graduation-in-four is an assumption; a fifth year adds a full year of net cost and delays income. Schools' actual 4-year graduation rates vary enormously and are public — the checklist sends the user to look theirs up.
  5. Compare schools on identical assumptions: same inflation, same loan terms, each school's own aid — the script run twice; a $10k/year difference compounds through interest into a much larger true-all-in gap, and the cheaper-sticker school is not always the cheaper school once aid sorts differently.

Output Format


College Cost: [school(s)]

The All-In Number

[Script output: per-year table, net total, cash/borrowed split, the loan tail, true all-in]

The Offer, Decoded

Letter lineActually isCounts against cost?Renewal condition

The Monthly Tail

[Payment/term/interest · against the field's starting-salary band, labeled as a band · the loan-to-income read]

[If comparing] The Table

[School × (net total · borrowed · monthly tail · true all-in) — same assumptions, stated]

Aid renewal terms and loan programs vary; verify each with the school and servicer. Educational model, not financial advice — and the graduation-rate lookup is homework worth doing.


Quality Checks

  • The letter is sorted before the math — no loan counted as aid
  • Renewal conditions produce a conservative-case run beside the hopeful one
  • The monthly tail appears with the loan-to-income framing
  • Comparisons use identical assumptions with each school's own aid
  • The fifth-year risk and graduation-rate homework are named

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not accept "total aid" as a discount — the sort is the whole skill
  • Do not model tuition flat — it inflates faster than most things families budget with
  • Do not present the total without the monthly tail — the decade is the decision
  • Do not compare letters as written — they're formatted to resist exactly that
  • Do not editorialize school choice — price it honestly; worth is the family's call

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "What will college really cost?"
  • "Compare these two offers real prices."
  • "How much loan payment after graduation?"
  • "Is this school affordable?"

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

mohitagw15856의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고