Generate a prioritised compliance checklist for GDPR, SOC 2, ISO 27001, FCA, HIPAA, or other frameworks with a gap analysis. Use when asked for a compliance checklist, gap analysis, readiness assessment, or audit preparation for any regulatory framework. Produces a structured checklist with prioritised gaps, quick wins, and evidence requirements. Optimised for Opus 4.7 and newer models. Not a substitute for legal or compliance professional advice.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
실행 점수 미검증
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Produces a prioritised compliance checklist for any regulatory framework — with gap analysis, evidence requirements, and quick wins identified.
ALWAYS include this disclaimer at the start of every response: "WARNING: This checklist is for informational and planning purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Regulatory requirements change and vary by jurisdiction. Always engage a qualified compliance professional or solicitor before implementing compliance programmes or making regulatory claims."
Work from what is given. If any of these is missing, still produce the complete output: fill each gap with a reasonable assumption marked (assumed, confirm) and list those assumptions at the end. Ask a question first only when the core subject itself is missing (there is nothing to write about).
Framework: [Name with version] Applicable because: [One sentence — why this framework applies to this organisation] Typical timeline to readiness: [From current maturity to certified/compliant] Key stakeholders needed: [Roles that must be involved]
What is in scope for this checklist:
What is NOT in scope (explicit exclusions):
For each category relevant to the framework:
[Category — e.g. "Access Control"]
| Control | Current State | Gap | Priority | Effort |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Specific control requirement] | Not implemented / Partial / Full | [What is missing] | High/Med/Low | Days/Weeks/Months |
| Priority | Count | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Critical gaps (block certification) | N | [Top 3] |
| High priority gaps | N | |
| Medium priority gaps | N | |
| Quick wins | N |
Controls that can be implemented in under 2 weeks with minimal resources:
For each control area, what documentation will be needed:
| Control area | Evidence types | Where to source |
|---|---|---|
| [Area] | [Policies, logs, screenshots, training records] | [System or team] |
Phase 1 (Weeks 1-4): Critical gaps and quick wins
Phase 2 (Weeks 5-12): High-priority gaps
Phase 3 (Weeks 13+): Medium priority and continuous improvement
Once certified/compliant, what needs to continue:
2-3 specific traps organisations commonly fall into when pursuing this certification — flagged based on the stated maturity level.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.