본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

contract-red-flags

Scan a contract you're about to sign in plain language — surface the clauses that could bite you, what they mean, and what to question or renegotiate. Use when asked to check this contract before I sign, what am I agreeing to, are there red flags in this agreement, or explain this contract's risky bits. Produces a plain-English flag list of the risky/unusual clauses (auto-renewal, lock-in, liability, IP, termination, fees), what each means for you, questions to ask, and suggested changes — flagging when it's important enough for a lawyer. Not legal advice.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.2 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Contract Red Flags

Most people sign contracts they haven't really read — and the damage lives in the clauses they skimmed: auto-renewals, one-sided termination, liability waivers, IP grabs, hidden fees. This reads the agreement as a wary friend would, translates the risky bits into plain language, and tells you what to question or push back on before you sign — while being clear it's not legal advice and some contracts warrant a lawyer.

What This Skill Produces

  • A plain-English flag list — the clauses that could hurt you, translated out of legalese
  • What each means for you — the real-world consequence, not the wording
  • Questions to ask — what to clarify with the other party before signing
  • Suggested changes — reasonable edits or removals to request
  • A severity read — which flags are dealbreakers vs. minor, and when the contract is big enough to warrant a lawyer

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • The contract — the text or the key clauses (paste what you can)
  • The type & stakes — employment, lease, freelance/SOW, service, sale, NDA — and how much rides on it
  • Your role — which side you're on
  • Your concerns — anything specific worrying you
  • Region — laws vary; affects enforceability and rights

Framework: Translate, Flag, Question

  1. Read for the common traps. Auto-renewal/evergreen terms, long lock-ins and exit/termination terms, liability and indemnity, IP ownership, non-competes, fee/late-charge clauses, unilateral change rights, and dispute/arbitration terms.
  2. Translate to consequences. For each flag, say plainly what it means for the person ("they can cancel on 7 days' notice; you can't"), not just the clause.
  3. Separate dealbreakers from noise. Rank flags by real risk so the person knows what to fight for vs. accept.
  4. Give questions and edits. Offer specific things to ask and reasonable changes to request — most terms are negotiable if you raise them.
  5. Know the limit. Enforceability varies by jurisdiction and you're not giving legal advice — flag high-stakes or complex contracts for a lawyer.

Output Format

Contract review: [type] · your side: [x] · stakes: [level]

Red flags (plain English)

ClauseWhat it saysWhat it means for youSeverity
[name][plain summary][consequence]🚩/⚠️/ℹ️

Ask before signing: [clarifying questions]. Request these changes: [reasonable edits/removals]. Dealbreakers: [the ones to resolve or walk].

Not legal advice. Enforceability varies by jurisdiction. For high-stakes or complex agreements, have a qualified lawyer review it.

Quality Checks

  • Flags the common trap clauses present in the contract
  • Translates each into a real-world consequence, not legalese
  • Ranks flags by severity (dealbreaker vs minor)
  • Provides questions to ask and specific changes to request
  • Flags when the stakes warrant a lawyer
  • States it isn't legal advice / laws vary

Anti-Patterns

  • Restating legalese without translating the consequence.
  • Flagging everything equally with no severity.
  • Missing the quiet killers (auto-renewal, unilateral change, arbitration).
  • Asserting enforceability as fact across jurisdictions.
  • Reassuring on a high-stakes contract that truly needs a lawyer.

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Check this freelance contract before I sign it."
  • "What am I actually agreeing to in this lease?"
  • "Are there red flags in this employment offer's fine print?"
  • "Explain the risky clauses in this service agreement."
  • "This NDA feels one-sided — what should I push back on?"

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 17일 업데이트

mohitagw15856의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고