본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

contract-renewal-tracker

Never get auto-renewed into another year again — the contract inventory with the dates that matter (notice deadlines, not renewal dates), the calendar system with decision-time buffers, and the renewal-decision ritual that renegotiates instead of rubber-stamping. Use when asked track our contracts and renewals, we got auto-renewed again, when do we have to decide on this vendor, or set up renewal management. Produces the inventory with notice-deadline math, the alert system, the renewal-decision checklist, and the negotiation-window playbook.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md6.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Contract Renewal Tracker Skill

The auto-renewal ambush is a calendar failure wearing a legal costume: the contract renews on March 1, but the decision died on January 29 — the 30-day notice deadline nobody tracked (vendor-breakup-email learned this the hard way; this skill prevents needing that lesson). The tracker inventories every contract with the date that matters (notice deadline = renewal date − notice period − decision buffer), alerts at decision-time (not deadline-time — an alert with no time to decide is a countdown to the default), and attaches the renewal ritual: every renewal is a negotiation window and a vendor-comparison-matrix-lite moment, because the rubber-stamp renewal is where pricing quietly ratchets.

What This Skill Produces

  • The inventory — every contract: vendor, cost, term, renewal date, notice period, the computed act-by date, owner
  • The alert system — calendar entries at act-by minus the decision buffer, with owners, in a shared calendar that survives personnel changes
  • The renewal ritual — the decision checklist: usage audit, market check, the renegotiation ask, then renew/renegotiate/exit
  • The negotiation playbook — what the renewal window makes possible (the only time vendor leverage flips to you)

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • The contract population — every recurring agreement: software (subscription-audit finds the small ones), services, leases, insurance, maintenance; the inventory hunt mirrors the subscription hunt at company scale
  • The terms, from the documents — renewal dates and notice periods from the contracts (memory says "sometime in spring"; the contract says "60 days written notice" — the tos-decoder-grade reading of the renewal clauses)
  • The owners — who decides each contract's fate; unowned contracts auto-renew by definition
  • The calendar infrastructure — where alerts live such that they survive the tracker's author leaving (the shared calendar, not the personal one)

Framework: The Tracker Rules

  1. The act-by date is the only date: renewal date − notice period − decision buffer (30 days for simple tools, 90 for anything needing a vendor-comparison-matrix evaluation) = the date on the calendar. Tracking renewal dates instead of act-by dates is the ambush with better documentation.
  2. Alerts carry the decision, not just the date: the calendar entry names the contract, the cost, the owner, and the question ("Renew CRM at $18k? Act by Feb 15; notice by Mar 1; renews Apr 1") — an alert that requires archaeology to act on gets snoozed into the default.
  3. The ritual runs three checks before any renewal: usage (are we using what we pay for? — seat counts and feature audits routinely fund the year's savings) · market (the 30-minute competitive-scan-lite: has the category moved?) · the ask (the renegotiation email — see rule 4). Renew-as-is is a legitimate outcome of the ritual; as a default it's a pricing escalator.
  4. The window is your only leverage: vendors price renewals expecting rubber stamps — the notice window is the one period where "we're evaluating alternatives" is both true-sounding and consequence-bearing. The playbook asks: multi-year for a discount (only where the tool is proven), seat right-sizing, the competitor quote on the table (the-price-pushback dynamics, reversed — you're the client now). Even the ask that fails costs one email.
  5. The tracker survives its author: shared calendar, the inventory in the team's space (spreadsheet-handover-grade documentation), owners named per contract, and the quarterly sweep (new contracts in — the intake rule: no signature without an inventory row — departed owners' contracts reassigned). Auto-renewal ambushes cluster in the quarter after the tracker's owner leaves.

Output Format

Renewal Tracker: [org/team] — [N] contracts, [$X] annual

The Inventory

ContractCost/yrRenewsNoticeAct byOwner

The Alert System

[Calendar: act-by minus buffer, per contract · the alert's decision-carrying format · the shared-calendar rule]

The Renewal Ritual

[Usage audit → market check → the renegotiation ask → renew / renegotiate / exit (per vendor-breakup-email)]

The Intake + Survival Rules

[No signature without an inventory row · quarterly sweep · owner-departure reassignment]

Quality Checks

  • Every date came from the contract's actual clause, not memory
  • The calendar carries act-by dates with decision buffers, not renewal dates
  • Every contract has a named owner
  • The ritual's three checks run before any renewal
  • The intake rule and quarterly sweep keep the inventory current

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not track renewal dates — the act-by date is the decision's real deadline
  • Do not alert without the decision context — archaeology-requiring alerts get snoozed into defaults
  • Do not rubber-stamp proven tools — the usage audit and the ask cost minutes and fund budgets
  • Do not keep the tracker personal — the ambushes cluster after the owner leaves
  • Do not sign anything into the void — no inventory row, no signature; the intake rule is the whole system's moat

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Track our contracts and renewals."
  • "We got auto-renewed again."
  • "Do we have to decide on this vendor?"
  • "Set up renewal management."

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.5천2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

mohitagw15856의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고