Use when long-lived agents, project memories, system prompts, or playbooks are repeatedly summarized, rewritten, or optimized and risk losing domain detail, provenance, or execution learnings.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyzes git diffs or staged changes and generates narrative commit messages that explain WHY a change was made, not just what changed — following Conventional Commits format. Use when asked to "write a commit message", "generate a commit", "describe my changes", "what should I commit this as", "commit this", "summarize my diff", or "help me commit". Works with git diff output, staged files, or plain descriptions of changes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Attribution: Sourced from github/awesome-copilot by GitHub Community, licensed MIT. Modified for this collection.
Transforms raw git diffs and change descriptions into clear, story-driven commit messages that follow the Conventional Commits specification. Instead of "update file.js", you get messages that communicate intent, context, and impact.
Have at least one of the following ready:
git diff or git diff --stagedAsk the user (or infer from the diff) for:
If the user provides a raw git diff, extract this context automatically from the diff.
Map the change to a Conventional Commits type using this guide:
| Type | Use When |
|---|---|
feat | A new feature or capability is added |
fix | A bug or incorrect behavior is corrected |
refactor | Code restructured without changing behavior |
perf | A change that improves performance |
docs | Documentation only changes |
style | Formatting, whitespace, missing semicolons (no logic change) |
test | Adding or updating tests |
chore | Build process, dependency updates, config changes |
ci | CI/CD pipeline changes |
revert | Reverting a previous commit |
See references/conventional-commits-guide.md for detailed examples.
Follow this structure:
<type>(<optional scope>): <short imperative summary>
<body — the story: why this change was made, what problem it solves>
<footer — issue refs, breaking change notices>
Subject line (first line):
Body (the story):
Footer:
Closes #123, Fixes #456, Refs #789BREAKING CHANGE: <description>Produce the commit message in a copyable code block, followed by a one-line plain-English explanation of the story you told.
Example output:
fix(auth): prevent token refresh loop on expired sessions
When a user's session expired mid-request, the auth middleware was
triggering a token refresh, which itself failed validation and triggered
another refresh — causing an infinite retry loop that crashed the app.
This adds a recursion guard flag that aborts the refresh cycle if a
refresh is already in progress, returning a clean 401 instead.
Closes #312
Story told: A silent infinite loop on session expiry was crashing the app; this stops the cycle early and returns a clean error.
If the diff contains logically separate changes, split them into multiple commit messages and tell the user. Use this heuristic:
| Situation | How to Handle |
|---|---|
| User provides no context beyond a diff | Infer type and scope from file names and changed symbols |
| Changes span many files with no clear theme | Ask: "Is this one logical change, or multiple?" |
| Breaking change detected | Add BREAKING CHANGE: footer automatically |
| User says "keep it short" | Omit body, just write a strong subject line |
| No issue number available | Omit the footer entirely |
# Get your staged diff to paste into Copilot
git diff --staged
# Or get the last uncommitted working tree changes
git diff
See references/conventional-commits-guide.md for type examples and scope guidelines.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Use when long-lived agents, project memories, system prompts, or playbooks are repeatedly summarized, rewritten, or optimized and risk losing domain detail, provenance, or execution learnings.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Adds educational comments to a code file so it becomes a learning resource, asking for the file (with a list of close matches) if none is given. Use when preparing code for learners, onboarding, or teaching.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Write, debug, and optimize Adobe Illustrator automation scripts using ExtendScript (JavaScript/JSX). Use when creating or modifying scripts that manipulate documents, layers, paths, text frames, colors, symbols, artboards, or any Illustrator DOM objects. Covers the complete JavaScript object model, coordinate system, measurement units, export workflows, and scripting best practices.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Patterns and techniques for adding governance, safety, and trust controls to AI agent systems. Use this skill when: - Building AI agents that call external tools (APIs, databases, file systems) - Implementing policy-based access controls for agent tool usage - Adding semantic intent classification to detect dangerous prompts - Creating trust scoring systems for multi-agent workflows - Building audit trails for agent actions and decisions - Enforcing rate limits, content filters, or tool restrictions on agents - Working with any agent framework (PydanticAI, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents, LangChain, AutoGen)
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.