본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

achieving-cmmc-level-2-compliance

Prepare for CMMC Level 2, a cybersecurity certification for defense contractors. Define the systems handling controlled information, review security requirements, calculate the SPRS assessment score, and organize remediation plans and evidence into a readiness report.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Define the assessment scope for systems handling controlled information
  • Calculate an SPRS score and prioritize unmet security requirements
  • Prepare security plans, remediation milestones, and assessment evidence

포함된 파일(5)

  • SKILL.md8.5 KB
  • assets/template.md3.7 KB
  • LICENSE11.0 KB
  • references/standards.md4.8 KB
  • scripts/process.py7.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Achieving CMMC Level 2 Compliance

When to Use

  • When an organization in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB) stores, processes, or transmits Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract.
  • When a contract includes DFARS 252.204-7012 (safeguarding/incident reporting), -7019/-7020 (NIST 800-171 self-assessment + SPRS), or the new -7021 (CMMC requirement).
  • When preparing for a C3PAO third-party assessment or a DoD-led assessment.
  • When you must compute, post, or improve an SPRS score based on the NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Methodology.
  • When authoring or remediating a System Security Plan (SSP) and POA&M for the 110 requirements.
  • When scoping which assets fall inside the CUI/FCI boundary (CUI assets, security-protection assets, contractor risk-managed assets, out-of-scope).

Prerequisites

  • Knowledge of which contracts carry CUI and the CUI categories involved (check the contract and the DoD CUI Registry).
  • An asset inventory and network diagram so you can define the CMMC assessment scope before assessing controls.
  • The NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 requirements and the DoD Assessment Methodology scoring weights.
  • A documented SSP (its absence is itself a failed requirement — 3.12.4).
  • Identification of any External Service Providers (ESPs) / cloud services touching CUI, and whether they meet FedRAMP Moderate (or equivalency).

Workflow

1. Determine applicability and CUI categories

Confirm the contract requires CMMC Level 2 (CUI present, not just FCI). FCI-only contracts are Level 1 (the 15 FAR 52.204-21 requirements). Identify CUI categories from the contract and the DoD CUI Registry.

2. Scope the environment

Classify every asset into one of the CMMC scoping categories:

  • CUI Assets — process/store/transmit CUI (in scope, assessed against all applicable controls).
  • Security Protection Assets — provide security to the CUI environment (in scope).
  • Contractor Risk Managed Assets — could but are not intended to handle CUI; managed by policy.
  • Specialized Assets (IoT/OT, GFE, test equipment) — documented, limited assessment.
  • Out-of-Scope — physically/logically isolated from CUI.

Minimize scope deliberately — a smaller, well-segmented CUI enclave is far cheaper to certify than a flat network.

3. Implement the 110 requirements (NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2)

Work the 14 families (3.1–3.14). For each requirement, implement, then write the how in the SSP. High-leverage early wins: MFA (3.5.3), FIPS-validated cryptography (3.13.11), audit logging (3.3.x), access control + least privilege (3.1.x), and incident response (3.6.x).

4. Score with the DoD Assessment Methodology (SPRS)

Start at 110 and subtract the weighted value (1, 3, or 5 points) of each unmet requirement; partial credit applies to a small number of controls (e.g., MFA, FIPS crypto). The result is the SPRS score (maximum 110; the methodology floor is −203). Post the score, the SSP date, and the assessment scope to SPRS (or eMASS for higher assessments).

5. Build a compliant POA&M

Document every unmet requirement with owner, remediation, and milestone. Constraints under the CMMC rule: a Conditional status requires a score of at least 80% (≥ 88 of 110), only POA&M-eligible requirements may be deferred (the highest-weighted security requirements must be fully met — verify eligibility against 32 CFR Part 170), and all POA&M items must be closed within 180 days to convert Conditional → Final.

6. Assess (self or C3PAO)

  • Level 1 and a subset of Level 2 = annual self-assessment with an affirmation in SPRS.
  • Level 2 (most CUI contracts) = triennial C3PAO certification assessment.
  • Level 3 = DoD (DIBCAC) assessment on top of Level 2, adding SP 800-172 enhanced requirements. Assessors evaluate each objective as MET / NOT MET / N/A with evidence (examine/interview/test). A senior official files the annual affirmation of continued compliance.

7. Maintain certification

Certification is valid three years with annual affirmations. Maintain the SSP, re-score on change, keep evidence current, and feed significant changes back into the assessment.

Key Concepts

ConceptDefinition
FCIFederal Contract Information — Level 1 protects it (FAR 52.204-21).
CUIControlled Unclassified Information — Level 2 protects it (NIST 800-171).
110 requirementsThe SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families.
SPRSSupplier Performance Risk System — where the 800-171 score is posted.
DoD Assessment MethodologyThe 1/3/5-point weighting used to compute the score from 110.
C3PAOCMMC Third-Party Assessment Organization — performs Level 2 certification.
POA&MPlan of Action & Milestones — limited, must close in 180 days for Final status.
Conditional vs FinalConditional = open POA&M (score ≥ 80%); Final = all controls met.
ESPExternal Service Provider — must meet FedRAMP Moderate / equivalency for CUI.
Scoping categoriesCUI / Security Protection / Contractor Risk Managed / Specialized / Out-of-Scope.

Tools & Systems

  • NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 — the 110 requirements (and 800-171A for assessment objectives).
  • DoD NIST SP 800-171 Assessment Methodology — the scoring weights.
  • 32 CFR Part 170 (CMMC Program rule) and 48 CFR / DFARS 252.204-7021 (acquisition rule).
  • SPRS — score posting; SAM.gov for registration.
  • SP 800-172 / 800-172A — enhanced requirements for Level 3.
  • GRC / compliance tooling — to manage the SSP, POA&M, and evidence (e.g., Xacta, RegScale, FutureFeed-style trackers).

Common Scenarios

  • Prime flows CUI to a sub. The sub needs its own Level 2 scope, SSP, SPRS score, and (most likely) C3PAO certification.
  • Score is below 88. Prioritize the highest-weighted unmet requirements (5-point, then 3-point) to clear the conditional threshold and shrink the POA&M.
  • Cloud holds CUI. Confirm the service is FedRAMP Moderate authorized or meets equivalency; document the responsibility split.
  • Flat network. Re-scope into a segmented CUI enclave to cut the assessment surface before spending on controls.
  • Annual affirmation due. A senior official affirms continued compliance in SPRS; let it lapse and you risk contract eligibility.

Output Format

Produce a CMMC Level 2 Readiness Report using assets/template.md, containing:

  1. Applicability & CUI categories — why Level 2 applies.
  2. Scope — assets by scoping category and the CUI boundary diagram reference.
  3. Control status by family — met / not met / N/A across the 14 families.
  4. SPRS score — computed score, deductions, and the gap to 110 and to the 88 threshold.
  5. POA&M — unmet requirements, eligibility check, owners, 180-day milestones.
  6. Assessment path — self vs C3PAO, target date, affirmation owner.
  7. Remediation roadmap — sequenced by point value and effort.

Use scripts/process.py to compute the SPRS score from a control-status JSON, flag POA&M-eligibility concerns, and report the gap to the conditional-certification threshold.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Assess exposure of Windows secrets protected by DPAPI, the operating system’s data protection service, during authorized security tests. Guide examination and decryption of saved credentials and browser data using available user sessions, credentials, or backup keys.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Assessing saved credential exposure in authorized tests
  • Examining collected DPAPI files offline
  • Reviewing protected browser and RDP credentials
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5만2026년 8월 31일 업데이트

Assess Shadow Credentials account takeover during authorized Active Directory testing. Examine permissions that allow public key registration, validate authentication without a password reset, and document credential cleanup, detection opportunities, and access control changes needed for remediation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Assessing risky permissions identified in BloodHound
  • Validating account takeover without resetting a password
  • Generating directory change records during security exercises
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5만2026년 8월 31일 업데이트

Create disk images for investigations using dd or dcfldd on Linux. The workflow covers write protection, bit-for-bit copying, hash checks to verify integrity, and documentation of the acquisition process.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Preserving a suspect drive before investigation
  • Creating evidence copies of USB devices or memory cards
  • Verifying that a disk image matches its source
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5만2026년 8월 31일 업데이트

Review Active Directory permissions with ldap3, a Python library for directory queries. Identify excessive access granted to non-administrative accounts, explain potential privilege escalation paths, and produce a JSON report with affected objects and remediation recommendations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Auditing excessive Active Directory permissions
  • Investigating privilege escalation paths from ordinary accounts
  • Reporting affected objects and permission remediation recommendations
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5만2026년 8월 31일 업데이트

Inspect suspicious Android APK files without running them. Analyze permissions, app components, suspicious code patterns, and network indicators, then produce a JSON risk report to support malware triage and detection rule development.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Triage suspicious APK files without running them
  • Inspect dangerous permission combinations and suspicious API calls
  • Extract network indicators for malware detection rules
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5만2026년 8월 31일 업데이트

Analyze access logs from AWS API Gateway, Kong, and Nginx with pandas, a Python data analysis library. Examine resource access patterns, authentication failures, and suspicious requests to investigate API abuse and inform detection rules.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Investigating sequential access to resource IDs
  • Examining spikes in authentication failures
  • Checking for rate limit bypass and injection attempts
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5만2026년 8월 31일 업데이트

mukul975의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고