본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

gdpr-prior-consultation

Guides the GDPR Article 36 prior consultation process with supervisory authorities when a DPIA indicates high residual risk. Covers timeline requirements, documentation, and outcome handling. Activate when DPIA residual risk remains high or when preparing regulatory submissions. Keywords: prior consultation, Article 36, DPIA, high risk, supervisory authority.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(5)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB
  • assets/template.md3.7 KB
  • references/standards.md2.2 KB
  • references/workflows.md1.6 KB
  • scripts/process.py4.8 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Conducting Prior Consultation Process

Overview

Article 36 requires controllers to consult the supervisory authority prior to processing where a DPIA under Art. 35 indicates that the processing would result in a high risk in the absence of measures taken by the controller to mitigate the risk, and the controller is unable to sufficiently mitigate that risk.

When Prior Consultation Is Required

Prior consultation is mandatory when all of the following conditions are met:

  1. A DPIA has been conducted under Art. 35.
  2. The DPIA identifies high risks to data subjects' rights and freedoms.
  3. All reasonably available mitigation measures have been applied.
  4. Residual risk remains high despite mitigation efforts.

Required Documentation (Art. 36(3))

The controller must provide:

  1. Respective responsibilities of controller, joint controllers, and processors
  2. Purposes and means of the intended processing
  3. Measures and safeguards to protect data subjects
  4. DPO contact details
  5. The completed DPIA under Art. 35
  6. Any other information the authority requests

Timeline

PhaseDurationReference
Authority initial response period8 weeks from receiptArt. 36(2)
Extension for complex casesUp to 6 additional weeksArt. 36(2)
Maximum total period14 weeksArt. 36(2)
Processing commencementOnly after advice received or deadline expiredArt. 36(2)

Consultation Process

Step 1: Pre-Submission Preparation

  1. Verify the DPIA is complete with all Art. 35(7) mandatory elements.
  2. Confirm all available mitigation measures have been documented.
  3. Document why residual risk remains high despite mitigation.
  4. Obtain DPO review and sign-off.
  5. Prepare the submission package with all Art. 36(3) documents.

Step 2: Submission

  1. Submit to the competent supervisory authority (lead authority for cross-border processing under Art. 56).
  2. Use the authority's prescribed format if available.
  3. Retain proof of submission with date stamp.

Step 3: Authority Engagement

  1. Respond promptly to requests for additional information.
  2. Track the 8-week deadline and any extension notifications.
  3. Do not commence processing until advice is received or deadline expires.

Step 4: Outcome Handling

OutcomeAction
Authority approvesProceed subject to any conditions specified
Authority provides recommendationsImplement recommendations, document compliance
Authority objects or restrictsDo not proceed; revise processing design; resubmit if appropriate
No response within deadlineDocument that consultation was submitted and deadline expired; may proceed

Member State Variations

Art. 36(5) permits Member State law to require prior consultation for processing in the public interest, including social protection and public health. Controllers must check local implementing legislation.

Common Reasons for Triggering Prior Consultation

  • Large-scale biometric identification systems
  • Systematic public area surveillance with facial recognition
  • Processing of genetic data at population scale
  • Automated decision-making with legal or similarly significant effects where mitigation is insufficient
  • Novel technology processing with unpredictable risk profiles

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Implements 42 CFR Part 2 protections for substance use disorder patient records. Covers written consent requirements stricter than HIPAA, re-disclosure prohibition, court order procedures, qualified service organization agreements, and 2024 amendments aligning Part 2 with HIPAA. Keywords: 42 CFR Part 2, substance use disorder, SUD records, re-disclosure, consent, Part 2 amendments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3172026년 3월 17일 업데이트

Guides assessment of third-country adequacy decisions under GDPR Article 45 for international data transfers. Covers the current EC adequacy decisions list, adequacy assessment criteria, partial adequacy handling, and monitoring of adequacy decision reviews. Keywords: adequacy decision, Article 45, third country, adequate protection, EC adequacy list.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3172026년 3월 17일 업데이트

Implements age-gating mechanisms for online services to restrict access based on user age. Covers hard gates versus soft gates, neutral age prompts, re-verification triggers, circumvention prevention, and regulatory requirements under GDPR, COPPA, UK Online Safety Act, and DSA. Keywords: age gate, age restriction, neutral prompt, children, online services, access control.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3172026년 3월 17일 업데이트

Evaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3172026년 3월 17일 업데이트

Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3172026년 3월 17일 업데이트

Implements GDPR Art. 22 automated decision-making and AI Act Art. 14 human oversight requirements for AI systems. Covers identification of solely automated decisions, meaningful human intervention design, logic explanation mechanisms, and contestation procedures. Keywords: Art. 22, automated decision, human oversight, AI Act, profiling, contestation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3172026년 3월 17일 업데이트

mukul975의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고