본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

hipaa-mobile-health

Addresses HIPAA compliance for mobile health (mHealth) applications, wearable devices, and remote patient monitoring. Covers OCR guidance on mobile device PHI, FDA-regulated mobile medical applications, FTC Health Breach Notification Rule for non-HIPAA apps, BYOD policies, and encryption requirements for ePHI on mobile platforms. Keywords: mHealth, mobile health, HIPAA mobile, wearable, remote monitoring, BYOD, mobile device management, app privacy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(5)

  • SKILL.md7.3 KB
  • assets/template.md4.2 KB
  • references/standards.md4.4 KB
  • references/workflows.md8.5 KB
  • scripts/process.py8.9 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

HIPAA Mobile Health — mHealth Privacy and Security

Overview

Mobile health (mHealth) encompasses the use of mobile devices, applications, wearable sensors, and remote patient monitoring systems to deliver healthcare services and manage health information. OCR has issued specific guidance on HIPAA compliance for mobile devices, recognizing that the proliferation of smartphones, tablets, and wearable health technology creates significant risks to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of ePHI. The regulatory landscape intersects HIPAA (for covered entities and business associates), FDA regulation (for mobile medical devices/software as a medical device), and FTC jurisdiction (for consumer health apps not covered by HIPAA).

Regulatory Framework

HIPAA Security Rule — Mobile-Relevant Provisions

  • §164.310(b): Workstation use — policies specifying the proper functions to be performed and the physical attributes of surroundings for workstations accessing ePHI (includes mobile devices)
  • §164.310(c): Workstation security — physical safeguards for workstations accessing ePHI to restrict access to authorized users
  • §164.310(d): Device and media controls — policies for receipt, removal, disposal, and re-use of hardware and electronic media containing ePHI
  • §164.312(a)(1): Access control — unique user identification, emergency access procedure, automatic logoff, encryption and decryption
  • §164.312(a)(2)(iv): Encryption and decryption (addressable) — encrypt ePHI stored on mobile devices
  • §164.312(d): Person or entity authentication — verify identity of persons seeking access via mobile
  • §164.312(e)(1): Transmission security — protect ePHI transmitted over wireless and cellular networks

OCR Mobile Device Guidance

OCR guidance emphasizes that the Security Rule applies to ePHI on all electronic media, including mobile devices. Key OCR positions:

  1. Mobile devices used to access, receive, transmit, or store ePHI must comply with Security Rule safeguards
  2. Lost or stolen unencrypted mobile devices containing ePHI constitute presumed breaches under the Breach Notification Rule
  3. The use of personal mobile devices (BYOD) does not exempt the entity from HIPAA compliance

FTC Health Breach Notification Rule (16 CFR Part 318)

For health apps and connected devices NOT covered by HIPAA:

  • Applies to vendors of personal health records and related entities
  • Expanded by FTC in 2023 to cover health apps, fitness trackers, and consumer wearables
  • Requires breach notification to consumers, FTC, and (for 500+ individuals) media
  • Violations subject to FTC enforcement (up to $50,120 per violation per day as of 2024)

FDA Mobile Medical Applications

  • FDA exercises enforcement discretion for most general wellness and health management apps
  • Software as a Medical Device (SaMD): FDA regulates apps that perform clinical decision support, diagnostic functions, or meet the definition of a medical device
  • FDA does NOT enforce HIPAA but PHI handling in FDA-regulated devices must still comply with HIPAA

Mobile Device Security Requirements

RequirementRegulationImplementation
Device encryption§164.312(a)(2)(iv)Full-disk encryption (AES-256) on all mobile devices accessing ePHI
Screen lock / auto-logoff§164.312(a)(2)(iii)Maximum 2-minute inactivity timeout; biometric or 6-digit PIN
Remote wipe capability§164.310(d)(2)(iii)MDM-enabled remote wipe for lost/stolen devices
Transmission encryption§164.312(e)(1)TLS 1.2+ for all data in transit; VPN for network access
App-level authentication§164.312(d)Per-app authentication for mHealth applications accessing ePHI
Malware protection§164.308(a)(5)(ii)(B)Mobile threat defense software; app vetting for sideloading
Audit logging§164.312(b)MDM audit trails for device access, app usage, data transfers
Data backup§164.308(a)(7)Automated backup of ePHI on mobile; exclude from consumer cloud backup

BYOD Policy Requirements

For organizations permitting personal device use:

  1. Acceptable use policy: Define permitted PHI activities on personal devices
  2. MDM enrollment: Require mobile device management enrollment with containerization
  3. Separation of personal and work data: Use app-level containers or work profiles
  4. Minimum device standards: OS version requirements, jailbreak/root detection, encryption verification
  5. Offboarding: Remote wipe of organizational data upon termination; leave personal data intact
  6. Risk acceptance: Document that BYOD risk has been evaluated per §164.308(a)(1) risk analysis

Wearable and Remote Patient Monitoring

Device CategoryHIPAA ApplicabilityKey Privacy Considerations
Prescribed RPM devices (e.g., cardiac monitors)Yes — CE or BA processes PHIEncryption at rest and in transit; BAA with device vendor; patient consent for continuous monitoring
Provider-issued wearables (e.g., glucose monitors)Yes — CE or BA processes PHIData minimization; defined retention; secure transmission to EHR
Consumer wearables (e.g., Fitbit, Apple Watch)Only if data flows to CE/BAFTC Health Breach Notification Rule applies if non-HIPAA; HIPAA applies once data enters CE/BA systems
Clinical trial wearablesYes — research use of PHIIRB oversight; authorization or waiver; de-identification at earliest opportunity

Enforcement Examples

  • Lifespan Health System (2020): $1.04 million — unencrypted stolen laptop; OCR found systemic failure to encrypt ePHI on mobile devices despite multiple prior incidents
  • Children's Medical Center of Dallas (2017): $3.2 million — unencrypted BlackBerry lost in 2009 and unencrypted laptop stolen in 2013; OCR cited failure to implement encryption after risk analysis identified the risk
  • CardioNet (2017): $2.5 million — stolen unencrypted laptop containing ePHI; OCR found insufficient risk analysis and device/media controls for mobile devices

Integration Points

  • hipaa-security-rule: Mobile device requirements are a subset of Security Rule technical and physical safeguards
  • hipaa-risk-analysis: Mobile devices must be included in enterprise risk analysis scope
  • hipaa-breach-notification: Lost/stolen unencrypted mobile devices trigger breach assessment
  • hipaa-employee-training: Workforce training must cover mobile device PHI handling
  • hipaa-baa-management: BAAs required with MDM vendors, mHealth app vendors, and RPM device manufacturers that access PHI

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Implements 42 CFR Part 2 protections for substance use disorder patient records. Covers written consent requirements stricter than HIPAA, re-disclosure prohibition, court order procedures, qualified service organization agreements, and 2024 amendments aligning Part 2 with HIPAA. Keywords: 42 CFR Part 2, substance use disorder, SUD records, re-disclosure, consent, Part 2 amendments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3172026년 3월 17일 업데이트

Guides assessment of third-country adequacy decisions under GDPR Article 45 for international data transfers. Covers the current EC adequacy decisions list, adequacy assessment criteria, partial adequacy handling, and monitoring of adequacy decision reviews. Keywords: adequacy decision, Article 45, third country, adequate protection, EC adequacy list.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3172026년 3월 17일 업데이트

Implements age-gating mechanisms for online services to restrict access based on user age. Covers hard gates versus soft gates, neutral age prompts, re-verification triggers, circumvention prevention, and regulatory requirements under GDPR, COPPA, UK Online Safety Act, and DSA. Keywords: age gate, age restriction, neutral prompt, children, online services, access control.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3172026년 3월 17일 업데이트

Evaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3172026년 3월 17일 업데이트

Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3172026년 3월 17일 업데이트

Implements GDPR Art. 22 automated decision-making and AI Act Art. 14 human oversight requirements for AI systems. Covers identification of solely automated decisions, meaningful human intervention design, logic explanation mechanisms, and contestation procedures. Keywords: Art. 22, automated decision, human oversight, AI Act, profiling, contestation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3172026년 3월 17일 업데이트

mukul975의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고