본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

agent-operated-software

Design and maintain applications where OpenRig agents help run the system. Organize instructions, shared state, and artifact checks, then trace unexpected behavior to the code, skill, or schema that needs repair.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Use when designing, building, operating, or diagnosing an ongoing application whose live backend or control loop includes OpenRig agents, including applications with a Markdown, YAML, or JSON agent control plane or a thin surface over specialist agent roles.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Designing an application operated by OpenRig agents
  • Organizing instructions and shared application state
  • Tracing unexpected behavior to its source
  • Defining checks for generated artifacts

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md5.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Agent-Operated Software

Agent-Operated Software is an ongoing application whose functioning runtime includes an OpenRig agent or rig in its live backend or control loop. The application surface can be thin: structured state and specialist roles do the work, while the UI makes that work legible and steerable.

Start with the shared taxonomy

  • AI-enabled software: application code owns the control loop and calls a model as one capability.
  • Agent-Operated Workflow: an agent owns one bounded procedure with a start and stop condition; see agent-operated-workflows.
  • Agent-Operated Software: agents participate in an ongoing application's functioning runtime.

An application may compose many Agent-Operated Workflows. A bounded workflow does not by itself make its surrounding product Agent-Operated Software, and a model call is neither category unless an agent owns part of the control loop.

Agents are part of the backend

In this architecture, behavior is not located only in functions. It is distributed across agents, skills, instructions, bootstrap files, schemas, Markdown, YAML, JSON, folders, and deterministic tools. A surprising result may therefore be a code defect or a coherence gap in this control plane. Trace the path that actually produced the behavior before choosing which layer to repair.

This is not permission to tolerate defects in OpenRig core or another rock-solid substrate. There, reproduce the bug, fix the code, and hold the full gate. The faster coherence-first posture belongs to recoverable agent-operated application layers whose state and behavior can be inspected and repaired cheaply.

Markdown is the control plane

Markdown is maximally useful to an agent while remaining legible enough for a human to steer. Put intent, work state, evidence, and decisions into stable addressed artifacts rather than private chat or an opaque custom database. Keep schemas and conventions aligned with the running behavior: the agent population acts on those files as executable context.

Use progressive disclosure. A skill's name and description are the hot trigger; its body is cold procedure. Descriptions say when to load, not how to work. The body should route the reader to exact sources instead of copying them into another doctrine fork.

Scripts can act as prompts. A good script returns the context or exact effect an agent needs; when it cannot, its failure teaches what it observed, why it stopped, and safe next actions. Keep deterministic mechanics in tools and judgment in agents.

Make artifacts self-certifying

When a tool produces an artifact, do not make every consumer invent a completeness test:

  1. Write to a partial path, never the final path.
  2. Verify the property that can actually be wrong, such as duration, streams, resolution, or schema.
  3. Flush and atomically rename the partial artifact to its final path.
  4. Write the manifest, then a .done sentinel last.

Consumers fail closed on the shared proof. A filename or exit code is not content verification.

Build with an agent SDLC

Select the rigor required by the outcome and the project's policy. Scope relationships, attributed evidence-backed item judgment, and genuinely distinct higher judgment have separate owners. One item judgment derives its upstream readiness; agents do not synchronize parent checkboxes, queue tags, or status prose. Capture alone is not acceptance, and readiness does not publish or advance a workflow. Use openrig-operating-model and rig proof --help for the supported judgment, correction, and read path. Keep historical locks and evidence addressable. The human supplies steering, taste, and decisions the project's authority reserves for them.

For studio applications, the running product is usually the best iteration surface. A separate mockup earns its cost only when it resolves a real design uncertainty that the running app cannot expose as cheaply. This removes a redundant artifact, not the visual review or proof contract.

Repair the narrowest authoritative layer

Find the generator or source that every affected agent actually consumes. Fix a code defect in code; fix a missing trigger in the skill; fix a malformed contract in its schema. Then verify through the consumer. Editing a rendered or installed copy creates a temporary fork, not a repair.

The payoff compounds: a correction to the shared application control plane changes the next agent's starting point. That is how an ongoing agent-operated system improves without making one human its permanent router.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Automate website interactions through a command-line browser tool. Navigate pages, fill forms, extract text, save screenshots or PDFs, reuse login sessions, and compare page states to check the effects of actions or website changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Automating form entry and submission
  • Extracting page text and saving screenshots
  • Comparing page appearance before and after changes
mvschwarz/openrig7.8천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Design and run bounded procedures in environments where current conditions are uncertain. The skill separates agent judgment from precise tool actions, verifies each effect, and records checkpoints so interrupted work can resume from observed evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Designing procedures for environments with varying conditions
  • Resuming interrupted operations from verified evidence
  • Deciding whether an agent or ordinary code should control a procedure
mvschwarz/openrig7.8천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Create reusable starting configurations that combine an agent’s role, startup context, and source history. The skill guides registry entries, checks whether their sources are current, and manages their progression from initial capture to recommendation or retirement.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Create reusable startup context for an agent role
  • Refresh an agent workspace from an existing starter
  • Check a starter’s source history and freshness
mvschwarz/openrig7.8천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Guides the design and review of agent startup context, including role files and links to authoritative records. It helps identify stale guidance, missing updates, overloaded startup files, and instructions that lose the purpose of the work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Designing startup files for a new agent
  • Reviewing stale guidance used by running agents
  • Separating role information from reusable procedures
mvschwarz/openrig7.8천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Configure selected OpenRig command permissions in Claude Code or Codex at the agreed project or user scope. Preserve existing restrictions, verify that settings load and behave as intended, and record additions so they can be removed later.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Configuring command permissions before launching an agent team
  • Reducing repeated approvals for selected rig commands
  • Adding permission rules within a chosen project scope
mvschwarz/openrig7.8천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Turn rough meeting notes, customer requests, and product ideas into structured backlog entries, a list of possible improvements. Capture who needs each idea and why, categorize it, and update matching entries with new evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Capturing feature ideas after a meeting
  • Recording requests from customers or sales
  • Logging product gaps found in competitor research
mvschwarz/openrig7.8천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

mvschwarz의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고