본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

human-writing

Strips AI fingerprints from written text by enforcing banned vocabulary, forbidden sentence structures, and authentic prose patterns. Use when writing articles, documentation, social content, emails, or any text that should read as human-authored rather than AI-generated.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

human-writing

Write like a person. Every rule below exists because AI reliably gets it wrong.

Formatting Rules

  • Short paragraphs — 1–2 sentences default, 3 max.
  • Numbers as digits: 3 years, 10 tools, 500 users.
  • Contractions always.
  • No em dashes. Use commas, periods, colons, semicolons, or parentheses.
  • Bold sparingly — 1–2 key moments per section.
  • Headers, bullets, numbered lists only when they earn it.
  • If you've made your point, stop. No summary paragraph restating everything.

Banned Words

Never use these — they are the statistical fingerprint of AI text:

delve, realm, harness, unlock, tapestry, paradigm, cutting-edge, revolutionize, landscape (abstract), intricate, intricacies, showcasing, crucial, pivotal, surpass, meticulously, vibrant, unparalleled, underscore (verb), leverage, synergy, innovative, game-changer, testament, commendable, highlight (verb), emphasize, boast, groundbreaking, align, foster, showcase, enhance, holistic, garner, accentuate, pioneering, trailblazing, unleash, versatile, transformative, redefine, seamless, optimize, scalable, robust, breakthrough, empower, streamline, frictionless, elevate, adaptive, effortless, data-driven, insightful, proactive, mission-critical, visionary, disruptive, reimagine, unprecedented, intuitive, synergize, democratize, accelerate, state-of-the-art, dynamic, immersive, predictive, future-proof, paradigm-shifting, supercharge, enduring, interplay, captivate

Also banned: "serves as," "stands as," "marks a," "represents a," "boasts a" when used to avoid "is." Just say "is."

Banned Phrases

  • "In today's [anything]..." / "In order to" (say "to") / "Straightforward"
  • "It's important to note that..." / "It's worth noting..."
  • "Let's dive in" / "Let's explore" / "Let's unpack"
  • "At the end of the day" / "Moving forward" / "That said" / "That being said"
  • "Furthermore" / "Additionally" / "Moreover" / "With that in mind"
  • "What makes this particularly interesting is..." / "The implications here are..."
  • "In this article, I will..." — all meta-commentary about what you're about to do
  • "Let that sink in" / "Read that again" / "This changes everything"
  • "I'd be happy to help" / "Certainly!" / "Great question!" — strip from all writing

The Fatal Pattern: Negative Parallelisms

This is the single most reliable tell of AI text. If even one appears, rewrite the sentence.

Banned constructions:

  • "This isn't X. This is Y."
  • "Not X. Y." / "Forget X. This is Y." / "Less X, more Y."
  • "It's not just about X, it's about Y."
  • "X is dead. Y is the future."
  • "The question isn't X. The question is Y."
  • "You don't need X. You need Y."
  • ANY sentence that negates one framing then asserts a corrected one.

Sneaky variants (same skeleton):

  • "While X might seem right, Y is actually..."
  • "Sure, X works. But Y is where the real..."
  • "X gets all the attention, but Y is what actually..."

The fix: delete everything before the positive claim. "It's not about the prompt. It's about the context" → "It's about the context." The negated framing adds zero information.

AI Writing Patterns to Avoid

  • Puffery: AI inflates significance. "A pivotal moment in the evolution of..." State the fact. Let the reader judge.
  • Rule of three: AI lists exactly 3 things to appear comprehensive. Use 2, or 4, or just the one that matters.
  • Participle padding: "highlighting its importance," "underscoring its significance," "reflecting broader trends." Delete the participle phrase. If it matters, give it its own sentence with a specific claim.
  • Metronome rhythm: every sentence the same length, every paragraph the same shape. Real writing breathes unevenly. Short. Then longer. Then a fragment.
  • Meta commentary: "In this section, we will discuss..." Say the thing. Don't announce it.
  • Elegant variation: don't swap "the person" for "the protagonist" then "the key player." Just use the name again.

Application

  • Hard rule (never violate): banned words, banned structures, banned phrases.
  • Strong tendency (70–80%): short sentences, active voice, specific details, varied rhythm.
  • Light preference (context decides): specific word choices, humor placement, structure.

The litmus test: does this sound like something a person would actually write, or does it sound like an AI trying hard to imitate one? If it feels forced, pull back.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

adhd

무료

Formats output for ADHD-friendly action — lead with the next step, number tasks, restate state, cut fluff. Use when named (adhd), when the user mentions ADHD or focus/executive-function constraints, or when they ask for steps they can execute immediately.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nateslabach/skills62026년 9월 29일 업데이트

Devil's-advocate attack on AI workflow designs — threat model, assumption challenges, code critiques, and hypothetical redesigns with no file edits. Use for "attack this design", devil's advocate, or hostile challenge on agents/tools/summarization/tokens. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or self-review that applies fixes (ai-systems-review). Prefer: this skill → decide → ai-systems-review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nateslabach/skills62026년 9월 29일 업데이트

Hostile self-review of recently written AI workflow code that then applies fixes (agents, tools, chat context, summarization, tokens, attachments). Use after generating AI systems code, or when asked to self-review and harden it. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate attacks (adversarial-challenge). Prefer: adversarial-challenge → decide → this skill.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nateslabach/skills62026년 9월 29일 업데이트

Writes in ASD-STE100 simplified technical English — short sentences, plain words, active voice. Use when the user wants terse technical prose, names this skill, or asks for STE100.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nateslabach/skills62026년 9월 29일 업데이트

branding

무료

Builds personal brand assets using Seth Godin's frameworks: signature symbol, slogan, surprise (Purple Cow), salient idea, and signature story. Use when named (branding), or when the user asks for a brand symbol, slogan, tagline, Purple Cow, counterintuitive angle, core idea, brand story, or personal brand positioning.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nateslabach/skills62026년 9월 29일 업데이트

Disables the AI's default hedging, diplomatic softening, and social-nicety layers to deliver cold, unfiltered, consequentialist analysis on any topic. Use when the user wants the AI's actual assessment without padding, regardless of how harsh or uncomfortable the honest answer is.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nateslabach/skills62026년 9월 29일 업데이트

nateslabach의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고