본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

just-stop

Stops "just one more" small tweaks that add scope without changing the outcome. Use when named (just-stop), or when about to implement extra polish, cleanup, or drive-by fixes beyond the stated goal.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

just-stop

True craft is knowing when to stop. "One more small change" is usually how scope dies by a thousand cuts.

When to apply

  • User names this skill (just-stop)
  • You are about to add "a few small tweaks," polish, cleanup, or drive-by fixes after the goal is already met
  • A change is justified as "while we're here" or "this will help overall" but is not required for the stated outcome

What matters

Identify the true goal / end state. Then ask:

  1. Does this change move that goal from unmet → met?
  2. Or does it only make an already-met goal nicer?

If (2), stop. Say what you'd tweak and leave it optional.

This is not anti-quality. Necessary fixes still ship. Nice-to-haves wait.

Operating rules

  • Goal first: Restate the required outcome in one line before adding work.
  • Challenge extras: When you or the user propose another change, classify it as required vs optional. Be explicit.
  • Ship at the value cliff: Stop where further work turns into icing — renames for taste, comment churn, speculative refactors, decorative CSS, "improve README a bit," extra error paths nobody asked for.
  • Necessary still means necessary: Bugs that block the goal, broken verification, or missing DoD items are not "just one more." Fix those.
  • Offer, don't sneak: If optional tweaks are genuinely valuable, list them after you're done. Don't implement them by default.

Response shape

When stopping yourself or the user:

Done for the goal: [one line]

Optional (not doing unless you want them):
- [tweak]
- [tweak]

When something is truly required:

Still required:
- [change] — [why the goal fails without it]

Anti-patterns

  • Implementing polish after DoD / acceptance already passes
  • Batching unrelated cleanup into a finished task
  • Treating taste differences as defects
  • Expanding a fix into a rewrite
  • Confusing "helpful" with "necessary"

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

adhd

무료

Formats output for ADHD-friendly action — lead with the next step, number tasks, restate state, cut fluff. Use when named (adhd), when the user mentions ADHD or focus/executive-function constraints, or when they ask for steps they can execute immediately.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nateslabach/skills62026년 9월 29일 업데이트

Devil's-advocate attack on AI workflow designs — threat model, assumption challenges, code critiques, and hypothetical redesigns with no file edits. Use for "attack this design", devil's advocate, or hostile challenge on agents/tools/summarization/tokens. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or self-review that applies fixes (ai-systems-review). Prefer: this skill → decide → ai-systems-review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nateslabach/skills62026년 9월 29일 업데이트

Hostile self-review of recently written AI workflow code that then applies fixes (agents, tools, chat context, summarization, tokens, attachments). Use after generating AI systems code, or when asked to self-review and harden it. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate attacks (adversarial-challenge). Prefer: adversarial-challenge → decide → this skill.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nateslabach/skills62026년 9월 29일 업데이트

Writes in ASD-STE100 simplified technical English — short sentences, plain words, active voice. Use when the user wants terse technical prose, names this skill, or asks for STE100.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nateslabach/skills62026년 9월 29일 업데이트

branding

무료

Builds personal brand assets using Seth Godin's frameworks: signature symbol, slogan, surprise (Purple Cow), salient idea, and signature story. Use when named (branding), or when the user asks for a brand symbol, slogan, tagline, Purple Cow, counterintuitive angle, core idea, brand story, or personal brand positioning.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nateslabach/skills62026년 9월 29일 업데이트

Disables the AI's default hedging, diplomatic softening, and social-nicety layers to deliver cold, unfiltered, consequentialist analysis on any topic. Use when the user wants the AI's actual assessment without padding, regardless of how harsh or uncomfortable the honest answer is.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nateslabach/skills62026년 9월 29일 업데이트

nateslabach의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고