본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

assumption-test

Test a consequential technical assumption with a small, falsifiable experiment before committing to an approach. Use when a plan depends on uncertain runtime, integration, or data behavior that inspection alone cannot establish. Not for preference interviews or routine implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md2.5 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Assumption test

A plausible assumption can survive every planning conversation and still fail on contact with the system. Turn the consequential uncertainty into a question an experiment can answer.

Steps

  1. Read the request, relevant code, and existing evidence. If inspection already settles the question, cite that evidence and stop; do not manufacture an experiment. If several assumptions remain, select the one whose failure would most change the approach.
  2. State the assumption as an observable prediction. Define what would refute it, what would support it within the tested scope, and what would leave it inconclusive. Set those criteria before observing the result.
  3. Design the smallest discriminating experiment. Use an isolated fixture or test environment, the real component under question where available, and a bounded number of operations. Name what the setup cannot represent; a mock's behavior is not evidence about its provider.
  4. Run the experiment within the user's authorized scope. Preserve the command, relevant inputs, actual output, and environment details needed to reproduce it. If a tool or dependency is unavailable, report the experiment as unrun or inconclusive, with the missing prerequisite.
  5. Close with the assumption, method, observation, verdict (supported within scope, refuted, or inconclusive), and the planning decision this evidence changes. Recommend the next discriminating check only if it could change that decision. Keep temporary code separate from the production implementation.

Guardrails

  • One successful trial does not establish a universal claim. State the tested conditions and remaining uncertainty, particularly for concurrency and performance.
  • Do not use production writes, real payments, destructive operations, or newly incurred costs without authorization. An experiment does not grant additional permissions.
  • Distinguish the component failing from the experiment failing to run. Never turn missing access or a broken fixture into a verdict about the system.
  • Do not fix the implementation or broaden into a build unless the user requested it. The deliverable is evidence that informs a decision.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design tools, scripts, and CLIs that an agent will call, so the interface teaches its own use instead of a wall of prose and examples. Use when building an MCP server or tool definition, writing an agent-facing script, or when an agent keeps misusing a tool it already has.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Neeeophytee/finding-unknowns-skills3532026년 9월 28일 업데이트

Surface the user's unknown unknowns before work starts. Use when the user is entering an unfamiliar codebase area, an unfamiliar domain (design, video, infra), or explicitly asks for a "blindspot pass" or to find their "unknown unknowns."

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Neeeophytee/finding-unknowns-skills3532026년 9월 28일 업데이트

Generate several genuinely different throwaway variations (designs, approaches, drafts) for the user to react to. Use when the user can only recognize what they want by seeing it — visual design, UX flows, naming, tone — or asks to brainstorm or prototype before building.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Neeeophytee/finding-unknowns-skills3532026년 9월 28일 업데이트

After a working session, produce a report on what changed plus a quiz the user must pass before merging. Use when the user asks "what did we actually do," wants to review a large change, or invokes a quiz before merge.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Neeeophytee/finding-unknowns-skills3532026년 9월 28일 업데이트

Audit the instructions an agent already carries — CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, skills, tool descriptions — for contradictions, over-constraint, and duplication, then propose a cut list. Use when an agent ignores its own instructions, when a CLAUDE.md has grown bloated, or when the user asks to audit or rightsize their agent context.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Neeeophytee/finding-unknowns-skills3532026년 9월 28일 업데이트

Keep a running implementation-notes.md during a build, logging every deviation from the plan and every discovered edge case. Use whenever implementing against an agreed plan or spec, especially in long autonomous sessions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Neeeophytee/finding-unknowns-skills3532026년 9월 28일 업데이트

Neeeophytee의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고