본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

commit

Create well-formatted commits with conventional commit messages and emoji

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md8.7 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Claude Command: Commit

Your job is to create well-formatted commits with conventional commit messages and emoji.

Instructions

CRITICAL: Perform the following steps exactly as described:

  1. Branch check: Checks if current branch is master or main. If so, asks the user whether to create a separate branch before committing. If user confirms a new branch is needed, creates one using the pattern <type>/<username>/<description> (e.g., feature/leovs09/add-new-command)
  2. Unless specified with --no-verify, automatically runs pre-commit checks like pnpm lint or simular depending on the project language.
  3. Checks which files are staged with git status
  4. If 0 files are staged, automatically adds all modified and new files with git add
  5. Performs a git diff to understand what changes are being committed
  6. Analyzes the diff to determine if multiple distinct logical changes are present
  7. If multiple distinct changes are detected, suggests breaking the commit into multiple smaller commits
  8. For each commit (or the single commit if not split), creates a commit message using emoji conventional commit format

Best Practices for Commits

  • Verify before committing: Ensure code is linted, builds correctly, and documentation is updated
  • Atomic commits: Each commit should contain related changes that serve a single purpose
  • Split large changes: If changes touch multiple concerns, split them into separate commits
  • Conventional commit format: Use the format <type>: <description> where type is one of:
    • feat: A new feature
    • fix: A bug fix
    • docs: Documentation changes
    • style: Code style changes (formatting, etc)
    • refactor: Code changes that neither fix bugs nor add features
    • perf: Performance improvements
    • test: Adding or fixing tests
    • chore: Changes to the build process, tools, etc.
  • Present tense, imperative mood: Write commit messages as commands (e.g., "add feature" not "added feature")
  • Concise first line: Keep the first line under 72 characters
  • Emoji: Each commit type is paired with an appropriate emoji:
    • ✨ feat: New feature
    • 🐛 fix: Bug fix
    • 📝 docs: Documentation
    • 💄 style: Formatting/style
    • ♻️ refactor: Code refactoring
    • ⚡️ perf: Performance improvements
    • ✅ test: Tests
    • 🔧 chore: Tooling, configuration
    • 🚀 ci: CI/CD improvements
    • 🗑️ revert: Reverting changes
    • 🧪 test: Add a failing test
    • 🚨 fix: Fix compiler/linter warnings
    • 🔒️ fix: Fix security issues
    • 👥 chore: Add or update contributors
    • 🚚 refactor: Move or rename resources
    • 🏗️ refactor: Make architectural changes
    • 🔀 chore: Merge branches
    • 📦️ chore: Add or update compiled files or packages
    • ➕ chore: Add a dependency
    • ➖ chore: Remove a dependency
    • 🌱 chore: Add or update seed files
    • 🧑‍💻 chore: Improve developer experience
    • 🧵 feat: Add or update code related to multithreading or concurrency
    • 🔍️ feat: Improve SEO
    • 🏷️ feat: Add or update types
    • 💬 feat: Add or update text and literals
    • 🌐 feat: Internationalization and localization
    • 👔 feat: Add or update business logic
    • 📱 feat: Work on responsive design
    • 🚸 feat: Improve user experience / usability
    • 🩹 fix: Simple fix for a non-critical issue
    • 🥅 fix: Catch errors
    • 👽️ fix: Update code due to external API changes
    • 🔥 fix: Remove code or files
    • 🎨 style: Improve structure/format of the code
    • 🚑️ fix: Critical hotfix
    • 🎉 chore: Begin a project
    • 🔖 chore: Release/Version tags
    • 🚧 wip: Work in progress
    • 💚 fix: Fix CI build
    • 📌 chore: Pin dependencies to specific versions
    • 👷 ci: Add or update CI build system
    • 📈 feat: Add or update analytics or tracking code
    • ✏️ fix: Fix typos
    • ⏪️ revert: Revert changes
    • 📄 chore: Add or update license
    • 💥 feat: Introduce breaking changes
    • 🍱 assets: Add or update assets
    • ♿️ feat: Improve accessibility
    • 💡 docs: Add or update comments in source code
    • 🗃️ db: Perform database related changes
    • 🔊 feat: Add or update logs
    • 🔇 fix: Remove logs
    • 🤡 test: Mock things
    • 🥚 feat: Add or update an easter egg
    • 🙈 chore: Add or update .gitignore file
    • 📸 test: Add or update snapshots
    • ⚗️ experiment: Perform experiments
    • 🚩 feat: Add, update, or remove feature flags
    • 💫 ui: Add or update animations and transitions
    • ⚰️ refactor: Remove dead code
    • 🦺 feat: Add or update code related to validation
    • ✈️ feat: Improve offline support

Guidelines for Splitting Commits

When analyzing the diff, consider splitting commits based on these criteria:

  1. Different concerns: Changes to unrelated parts of the codebase
  2. Different types of changes: Mixing features, fixes, refactoring, etc.
  3. File patterns: Changes to different types of files (e.g., source code vs documentation)
  4. Logical grouping: Changes that would be easier to understand or review separately
  5. Size: Very large changes that would be clearer if broken down

Examples

Good commit messages:

  • ✨ feat: add user authentication system
  • 🐛 fix: resolve memory leak in rendering process
  • 📝 docs: update API documentation with new endpoints
  • ♻️ refactor: simplify error handling logic in parser
  • 🚨 fix: resolve linter warnings in component files
  • 🧑‍💻 chore: improve developer tooling setup process
  • 👔 feat: implement business logic for transaction validation
  • 🩹 fix: address minor styling inconsistency in header
  • 🚑️ fix: patch critical security vulnerability in auth flow
  • 🎨 style: reorganize component structure for better readability
  • 🔥 fix: remove deprecated legacy code
  • 🦺 feat: add input validation for user registration form
  • 💚 fix: resolve failing CI pipeline tests
  • 📈 feat: implement analytics tracking for user engagement
  • 🔒️ fix: strengthen authentication password requirements
  • ♿️ feat: improve form accessibility for screen readers

Example of splitting commits:

  • First commit: ✨ feat: add new solc version type definitions
  • Second commit: 📝 docs: update documentation for new solc versions
  • Third commit: 🔧 chore: update package.json dependencies
  • Fourth commit: 🏷️ feat: add type definitions for new API endpoints
  • Fifth commit: 🧵 feat: improve concurrency handling in worker threads
  • Sixth commit: 🚨 fix: resolve linting issues in new code
  • Seventh commit: ✅ test: add unit tests for new solc version features
  • Eighth commit: 🔒️ fix: update dependencies with security vulnerabilities

Command Options

  • --no-verify: Skip running the pre-commit checks (lint, build, generate:docs)

Branch Naming Convention

When committing on master or main, the command will ask if you want to create a new branch. If yes, it creates a branch following this pattern:

<type>/<git-username>/<description>

Components:

  • <type>: The commit type (feature, fix, docs, refactor, perf, test, chore, etc.)
  • <git-username>: Your git username (obtained from git config user.name or the system username)
  • <description>: A kebab-case description of the change (e.g., add-user-auth, fix-login-bug)

Examples:

  • feature/leovs09/add-new-command
  • fix/johndoe/resolve-memory-leak
  • docs/alice/update-api-docs
  • refactor/bob/simplify-error-handling
  • chore/charlie/update-dependencies

Workflow:

  1. Command detects you're on master or main
  2. Asks: "You're on the main branch. Do you want to create a separate branch?"
  3. If "No": Proceeds with commit on current branch
  4. If "Yes": Analyzes your changes to determine the type, asks for a brief description, creates the branch, and proceeds with commit

Important Notes

  • By default, pre-commit checks (pnpm lint, pnpm build, pnpm generate:docs) will run to ensure code quality
  • If these checks fail, you'll be asked if you want to proceed with the commit anyway or fix the issues first
  • If specific files are already staged, the command will only commit those files
  • If no files are staged, it will automatically stage all modified and new files
  • The commit message will be constructed based on the changes detected
  • Before committing, the command will review the diff to identify if multiple commits would be more appropriate
  • If suggesting multiple commits, it will help you stage and commit the changes separately
  • Always reviews the commit diff to ensure the message matches the changes

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

actualize

무료

Reconcile the project's FPF state with recent repository changes

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit1.8천2026년 8월 27일 업데이트

add-task

무료

creates draft task file in .specs/tasks/draft/ with original user intent

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit1.8천2026년 8월 27일 업데이트

Evaluate and improve Claude Code commands, skills, and agents. Use when testing prompt effectiveness, validating context engineering choices, or measuring improvement quality.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit1.8천2026년 8월 27일 업데이트

analyse

무료

Auto-selects best Kaizen method (Gemba Walk, Value Stream, or Muda) for target

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit1.8천2026년 8월 27일 업데이트

Comprehensive A3 one-page problem analysis with root cause and action plan

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit1.8천2026년 8월 27일 업데이트

Analyze a GitHub issue and create a detailed technical specification

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit1.8천2026년 8월 27일 업데이트

NeoLabHQ의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고