Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Interview the user relentlessly until you reach a shared understanding. Map this as a design tree: every decision branches into the decisions that hang off it.
Work the tree in rounds. The frontier is every decision whose prerequisites are already settled — the questions you can ask now without guessing at answers you haven't heard yet. Ask the whole frontier in one round: number each question and give your recommended answer. Then wait for the user's answers before the next round.
Each question should be formatted like so:
❓ **Q1** - **<question title>**: <question body, might be multiple paragraphs, including multiple choices>
➡️ <your recommended answer>
Each round the user answers reshapes the tree — settled decisions push the frontier outward and unblock questions that depended on them. Recompute the frontier and ask the next round. A question whose answer depends on another question still open in this round belongs to a later round, not this one.
Finding facts is your job, never the user's. When a frontier question needs a fact from the environment (filesystem, tools, etc.), dispatch a sub-agent to find it — don't ask the user for anything you could look up yourself. Don't block on it: a running exploration is an unsettled prerequisite, so only the questions downstream of it wait for the sub-agent to report — ask the rest of the frontier now. The decisions are the user's — put each to them and wait.
The session is done when the frontier is empty: every branch of the design tree visited, nothing left silently assumed. Do not act on it until the user confirms you have reached a shared understanding. After confirmation, capture the settled decisions — the plan skill turns them into an executable plan.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Execute git commits using the Conventional Commits specification. Use this skill whenever the user says "commit", "git commit", "/commit", "stage and commit", "make a commit", "save my changes", or asks to commit specific files or all changes. Also triggers on phrases like "push my changes" (commit first), "commit everything", "commit with message X", or whenever git diff/status suggests uncommitted work the user wants to save. Handles auto-staging, diff analysis, message generation, breaking change detection, batch splitting of unrelated changes, safe pushes, and pre-commit hook failures gracefully. Always use this skill rather than ad-hoc git commit commands.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use for any question about a codebase, its architecture, file relationships, or project content — especially when graphify-out/ exists, where the question should be treated as a graphify query first. Turns any input (code, docs, papers, images, videos) into a persistent knowledge graph with god nodes, community detection, and query/path/explain tools.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Implement a piece of work based on a spec or set of tickets.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Maintain CHANGELOG.md — add new version entries, keep the Unreleased section, cut a release, or restructure the whole file — following the Keep a Changelog format and Semantic Versioning.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Search and explore an Obsidian vault through the NoteBrain CLI (semantic search, tags, backlinks, connections, hidden links, boosted retrieval). Use it whenever the user mentions their notes, knowledge base, Obsidian vault, semantic search, finding connections or unlinked notes, or asks exploratory questions like "what do I know about X", "find notes related to Y", "what connects to Z", or "summarize my notes on W" — even when they never say NoteBrain, vector search, or ChromaDB.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.