accounts
무료Manage multiple Claude Code accounts: add, list, check, launch, and install shell aliases for 10+ isolated CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR profiles.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Structured work: multi-phase tasks, feature builds, planning, objective loops, hill climbing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Five modes for structured multi-phase work. Match the request, follow that mode's instructions.
| Request pattern | Mode |
|---|---|
| Feature design/plan/implement/validate/release, end-to-end | Feature Lifecycle |
| Write spec, define requirements, create plan, interview, pause/resume | Planning |
| Keep working until, iterate until done, drive to done | Objective Loop |
| Make faster, speed up, reduce latency, profile, hill climb | Hill Climb |
| All other structured workflows: review, debug, refactor, research, create, explore, upgrade | Ad-Hoc Workflow |
Phase-gated workflow: DESIGN > PLAN > IMPLEMENT > VALIDATE > RELEASE. Each phase must pass its gate before the next begins.
If .feature/ exists, check state: python3 ~/.claude/scripts/feature-state.py status.
Route to the indicated phase.
If no feature state exists, determine entry from intent:
Load the phase reference, then follow it exactly:
| Phase | Reference | Produces |
|---|---|---|
| DESIGN | references/fl-design.md | design.md |
| PLAN | references/fl-plan.md | Wave-ordered task list |
| IMPLEMENT | references/fl-implement.md | Code changes |
| VALIDATE | references/fl-validate.md | Quality gate report |
| RELEASE | references/fl-release.md | Merged PR |
| End-to-end | references/fl-pipeline.md | Full lifecycle |
| State conventions | references/fl-shared.md | -- |
| Error recovery | references/fl-error-handling.md | -- |
State operations use python3 ~/.claude/scripts/feature-state.py only.
Never manipulate state files directly.
Spec writing, plan creation, interviews, ambiguity triage, and session pause/resume. Planning owns specs and saved plans; execution goes through subagent-driven-development or workflow dispatch.
| Signal | Reference |
|---|---|
| Write spec, user stories, define requirements, scope, acceptance criteria | references/pl-spec.md |
| Discuss ambiguities, resolve gray areas, pre-planning discussion | references/pl-pre-plan.md |
| Interview me, depth-first review, "not sure", "where do I start", "poke holes" | references/pl-depth-first-interview.md |
| Implicit ambiguity or unclear implementation choices | references/pl-ambiguity-triage.md |
| Another person holds needed facts or approval | references/pl-human-source-elicitation.md |
| Observation can settle a disputed choice | references/pl-empirical-prototype.md |
| Phase or session transition near | references/pl-context-boundary.md |
| Create plan, task plan, file-backed planning | references/pl-plan-files.md |
| Check plan, validate plan, pre-execution check | references/pl-check.md |
| List plans, show plan, complete plan, manage plans | references/pl-manage.md |
| Pause, save progress, handoff, stopping for now | references/pl-pause.md |
| Resume, continue, pick up where I left off | references/pl-resume.md |
For interviews, batch independent questions into frontier rounds. Ask dependent questions sequentially. Include a recommendation per question.
Iterate-until-verified-done loop. A user states an objective with verifiable done-criteria; each iteration routes one /do cycle, verifies by executing the criteria, and reschedules until verified-done or budget-stop.
Gather from the request: objective statement, DONE-CRITERIA (verifiable checks), iteration budget (default 5), NOT-DONE-YET guardrails (what may never be done to satisfy a criterion).
DONE-CRITERIA types: command (preferred -- deterministic command with expected
exit code/output) or rubric (only when no mechanical check exists -- frozen
at SPEC time, graded by a fresh-context agent).
Write .objective/<slug>/state.md from references/ol-state-file.md. Wakeups
resume from the state file, never conversation memory.
Plan the smallest next step. Route through /do: classify -> route -> dispatch agents -> evaluate. The loop dispatches exclusively through /do -- never edit inline.
Run every done-criterion check. A worker's "passes" claim never substitutes for re-running.
command: run it, paste exit code and output into iteration log.rubric: dispatch fresh-context sub-agent (did NOT produce the work) with
artifact + rubric only. Returns PASS/FAIL with cited evidence.All pass -> final report, STOP. Any unmet -> Phase 5.
Criteria-gaming guard: a criterion may never be satisfied by weakening a hook, gate, test, or safety control. Stop and report the conflict if that is the only visible path.
All pass: stop. Unmet + iterations remain: update state file, call
ScheduleWakeup (delay 270s for active polling, 1200s+ for idle work).
Budget exhausted: honest NOT-DONE report with per-criterion status.
Metric-driven optimization loop. One number moves; everything else stays fixed. Each iteration: hypothesis -> one change -> correctness floor -> re-measure -> accept or revert.
| Field | Required | Default |
|---|---|---|
| METRIC (one number, units, direction) | yes | -- |
| MEASURE (deterministic command) | yes | -- |
| TARGET (value that ends the loop) | yes | -- |
| FLOOR (correctness gate commands, must exit 0) | yes | -- |
| FIXTURE (pinned dataset/workload) | yes | -- |
| Variance tolerance | no | 2x baseline spread |
| Iteration budget | no | 8 |
| Plateau threshold K | no | 3 |
One METRIC per loop. Two numbers with a trade-off: promote one to the FLOOR.
Load references/hc-domain-playbooks.md for pre-filled SPEC blocks per domain
(frame rate, API latency, CI time, bundle size, memory, token cost).
Run MEASURE N times (N >= 5, N >= 10 for wall-clock). Record median and spread. If spread >= target improvement: STOP -- harness too noisy. Report noise sources and offer to stabilize first.
Locate the cost before changing anything. Load references/hc-profiling-tools.md
for per-domain tooling. Guessing at hot spots is the dominant failure mode.
State one hypothesis targeting the profiled hot spot. Make one change. Run FLOOR commands -- revert immediately if any fail.
Run MEASURE N times. Compare median to baseline. Accept only if delta > variance
tolerance. Update ledger (references/hc-ledger.md). If accepted, new baseline.
Target reached: final report. K consecutive non-improving iterations: plateau stop. Budget exhausted: report what worked and what remains.
For structured multi-phase work that does not fit the four modes above. Identify the workflow from the table, load its reference, follow its phases exactly.
Ask first: does this need a multi-agent workflow? Skip the workflow when:
single-file mechanical edit (use quick), one agent satisfies the request
(direct dispatch), lookup/status/count (direct agent). Escalate only when the
request has independent subtasks, needs orthogonal verification, or names
"comprehensive / thorough / adversarial / tournament."
| Pattern | What it does |
|---|---|
| Classify-and-act | Route by type up front; or classify-at-end |
| Fan-out-and-synthesize | Independent agents in parallel, barrier, one synthesizer |
| Adversarial verification | Executor builds, fresh skeptic refutes |
| Generate-and-filter | Over-generate candidates, gate keeps survivors |
| Tournament | N agents attempt same task; pairwise judges pick winner per round |
| Loop-until-done | Repeat until hard completion test passes |
| Quarantine | Read-only triage agent for untrusted content; separate privileged acting agent |
Load the reference for the matched workflow. references/... paths resolve
under ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}.
| Category | Workflow | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | Comprehensive multi-wave | references/comprehensive-review.md |
| Debugging | Evidence-based diagnosis | references/systematic-debugging.md |
| Refactoring | Safe refactoring with test gates | references/systematic-refactoring.md |
| Research | Formal research with source gates | references/research-pipeline.md |
| Research | Research to article | references/research-to-article.md |
| Content | Article evaluation | references/article-evaluation-pipeline.md |
| Content | De-AI content | references/de-ai-pipeline.md |
| Content | Documentation | references/doc-pipeline.md |
| Exploration | Codebase exploration | references/explore-pipeline.md |
| Exploration | Multi-perspective analysis | references/do-perspectives.md |
| Creation | Skill creation | references/skill-creation-pipeline.md |
| Creation | Hook development | references/hook-development-pipeline.md |
| Creation | MCP server | references/mcp-pipeline-builder.md |
| Creation | Pipeline scaffolding | references/pipeline-scaffolder.md |
| Creation | Domain research | references/domain-research.md |
| Creation | Chain composition | references/chain-composer.md |
| Creation | Auto-pipeline generation | references/auto-pipeline.md |
| Upgrade | Agent/skill upgrade | references/agent-upgrade.md |
| Upgrade | System upgrade | references/system-upgrade.md |
| Upgrade | Toolkit improvement | references/toolkit-improvement.md |
| Testing | Pipeline test runner | references/pipeline-test-runner.md |
| Testing | Pipeline retro | references/pipeline-retro.md |
| GitHub | Profile rules extraction | references/github-profile-rules.md |
| Orchestration | Task orchestration | references/workflow-orchestrator.md |
| Orchestration | DAG composition | references/dag-composition-patterns.md |
| Orchestration | Compatibility matrix | references/dag-compatibility-matrix.md |
| Orchestration | Common DAG patterns | references/dag-skill-patterns.md |
| Orchestration | DAG examples | references/dag-orchestration-examples.md |
| Orchestration | DAG advanced | references/dag-orchestration-advanced.md |
| Orchestration | Feedback loop | references/feedback-loop-construction.md |
"Workflow" is the canonical term. "Pipeline" is the retained legacy alias --
kept for back-compat in routing keys, meta.name exports, and
pipeline-index.json. Use "workflow" in new prose; do not rename code
identifiers.
| Error | Response |
|---|---|
| Mode ambiguous | Ask the user to clarify intent |
| Phase mismatch | Report current state, suggest correct next phase |
| Missing artifact | Route back to previous phase |
| Noisy harness (hill-climb) | Stop; report spread vs target improvement |
| Budget exhausted | Honest NOT-DONE report with per-criterion status |
| State file missing on wakeup | Report and stop; ask user to restate objective |
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Manage multiple Claude Code accounts: add, list, check, launch, and install shell aliases for 10+ isolated CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR profiles.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Improve architecture across modules by deepening interfaces.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Assessment: read-only inspection, codebase overview, value analysis, health checks, ADR consultation, decision analysis, multi-perspective critique.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Background memory consolidation — overnight review, merge, and injection payload for memory files.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Jev-driven browser automation: Jev picks operations, programs execute, a text model writes field values only when Jev cannot pick one from the goal.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Write, compose, integrate, and improve programs that call Jev, TypeSafe's System One judgment model.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.