본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

create-github-issue

Create GitHub issues for OpenShell bugs, feature requests, and tasks using the gh command-line tool. Organize firsthand use cases, impact, and completion criteria into the project's templates, then return the created issue link.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Create GitHub issues using the gh CLI. Use when the user wants to create a new issue, report a bug, request a feature, or create a task in GitHub. Trigger keywords - create issue, new issue, file bug, report bug, feature request, github issue.

연동 도구GitHub
설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Report an OpenShell bug you directly encountered
  • Request a feature for a specific OpenShell use case
  • Register an internal task with completion criteria
  • Include an example of a proposed CLI or configuration change

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md6.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Create GitHub Issue

Create issues on GitHub using the gh CLI. Issues must conform to the project's issue templates.

Prerequisites

The gh CLI must be authenticated (gh auth status).

Issue Templates

This project uses YAML form issue templates. When creating issues, match the template structure so the output aligns with what GitHub renders.

Bug Reports

Do not add a type label automatically. Confirm that the human operator personally uses OpenShell and directly encountered the problem or needs the feature for a specific use case. If that first-hand attestation or concrete use case is missing, ask for it before creating the issue. Frame the issue entirely in terms of OpenShell. The body must include a User Story, Problem Statement, Impact / Why This Matters, and Acceptance Criteria, followed by bug-specific reproduction steps using only OpenShell deployments and environment details. Do not install third-party tools to demonstrate reproducibility. Logs are optional and must be concise and redacted. If the issue suggests a change to configuration, CLI, SDK, or other user experience, include a notional example of the proposed interaction for human review. Inspect current repository labels before applying any; use only labels whose meaning is clear.

gh issue create \
  --title "bug: <concise description>" \
  --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## User Story

I use OpenShell for <specific use case>. I directly encountered or need <specific behavior> so that <outcome>.

## Problem Statement

<Summarize what is broken or missing in OpenShell's current behavior and when the issue occurs>

## Impact / Why This Matters

<Explain the consequences for users, the current workaround, and why that workaround is insufficient>

## Acceptance Criteria

- [ ] <observable outcome that demonstrates the bug is fixed>

## Reproduction Steps

1. <step>
2. <step>

## Environment

- OpenShell: <version>
- OS: <os>
- Runtime, deployment, or integration: <relevant details>

## Suggested UX (if applicable)

<Notional OpenShell CLI, configuration, SDK, or other interaction>

## Logs

<Optional minimal, redacted output>
EOF
)"

Feature Requests

Do not add a type label automatically. Confirm that the human operator personally uses OpenShell and directly encountered the problem or needs the feature for a specific use case. If that first-hand attestation or concrete use case is missing, ask for it before creating the issue. Frame the issue entirely in terms of OpenShell. The body must include a User Story, Problem Statement, Impact / Why This Matters, Proposed Design, Acceptance Criteria, and Alternatives Considered. The proposed design should define the user-facing workflow and externally observable behavior without prescribing internal implementation. Agent investigation is optional. If the issue suggests a change to configuration, CLI, SDK, or other user experience, include a notional example of the proposed interaction for human review. Inspect current repository labels before applying any; use only labels whose meaning is clear.

gh issue create \
  --title "feat: <concise description>" \
  --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## User Story

I use OpenShell for <specific use case>. I directly encountered or need <specific behavior> so that <outcome>.

## Problem Statement

<Summarize the capability or behavior missing from OpenShell today>

## Impact / Why This Matters

<Explain what users must do today, why it is insufficient, and the operational cost, risk, blocked workflow, or adoption barrier>

## Proposed Design

<The desired user-facing workflow and externally observable behavior, without prescribing internal implementation>

## Suggested UX (if applicable)

<Notional OpenShell CLI, configuration, SDK, or other interaction>

## Acceptance Criteria

- [ ] <specific, observable outcome>

## Alternatives Considered

<Other OpenShell workflows considered, including relevant middleware, interceptors, providers, or other extension points, and why the proposal better serves the use case. Prefer an applicable extension when it satisfies the use case; running another service alone is not a reason to dismiss it.>

## Agent Investigation

<Optional findings from codebase exploration>
EOF
)"

Tasks

For internal tasks that do not fit bug/feature templates, still obtain the operator's first-hand OpenShell use case before creating the issue:

gh issue create \
  --title "<type>: <description>" \
  --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## User Story

<I personally use OpenShell for this specific case and directly need this work because...>

## Description

<Clear description of the work>

## Context

<Any dependencies, related issues, or background>

## Definition of Done

- [ ] <criterion>
EOF
)"

GitHub built-in issue types (Bug, Feature, Task) should come from the matching issue template when possible, or be set manually afterward. Do not try to emulate them through labels.

Creating an issue does not accept it. Follow Label Discovery in CONTRIBUTING.md to retrieve every page of current state:* label definitions and resolve unclear meanings, then follow its triage → validation → human acceptance process. Agents may assess facts, but only humans decide whether to accept work or place it on the roadmap. A direct user request authorizes the requested planning or implementation phase without changing issue disposition.

Useful Options

OptionDescription
--title, -tIssue title (required)
--body, -bIssue description
--label, -lAdd label (can use multiple times)
--milestone, -mAdd to milestone
--project, -pAdd to project
--webOpen in browser after creation

After Creating

The command outputs the issue URL and number.

Display the URL using markdown link syntax so it's easily clickable:

Created issue [#123](https://github.com/OWNER/REPO/issues/123)

Use the issue number to:

  • Reference in signed-off Conventional Commits: git commit --signoff -m "fix(cli): validate empty requests (fixes #123)"
  • Create a branch following Branch Names in CONTRIBUTING.md.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Process one recommendation selected by ID from a local issue or CI triage report. Apply, reject, or defer it, record the outcome, and obtain separate confirmation before each change made on GitHub.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Apply one recommendation selected by its item ID
  • Reject a recommendation and record the reason
  • Defer a decision for the next queue review
NVIDIA/OpenShell1.7만2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Turn a GitHub issue into a scoped implementation plan and, when authorized, code changes, tests, documentation, and a pull request that closes it. Check existing ownership and feedback to keep work aligned with acceptance criteria.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Creating an implementation plan from a GitHub issue
  • Implementing an authorized issue with focused tests
  • Updating documentation alongside behavior changes
NVIDIA/OpenShell1.7만2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Maintain and validate OpenShell builds for Windows on x64 and ARM64 using MSVC, Microsoft's C++ toolchain. Check compilation, build executables, run tests on native hosts, and report artifacts and unsupported driver behavior.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Investigating Windows compilation failures
  • Building x64 and ARM64 release executables
  • Checking errors for unsupported drivers
NVIDIA/OpenShell1.7만2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Create GitHub pull requests with the gh command-line tool. Check linked issues, contributor permissions, branch conventions, and relevant tests, then prepare a title and description that follow the project's contribution rules.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Submit code changes for review
  • Open a draft pull request
  • Link a pull request to its issue
NVIDIA/OpenShell1.7만2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Turn a design request into an OpenShell RFC, a proposal for review and discussion. The skill follows the project template, assigns an available number, and organizes motivation, alternatives, and open questions into a draft.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Drafting an architecture proposal
  • Organizing an API change proposal
  • Documenting a process change
NVIDIA/OpenShell1.7만2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Investigate a specific OpenShell problem or feature need and create a structured GitHub issue. Record observed behavior, technical findings, alternatives, and missing evidence so a human can decide what to accept and pursue.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Investigate an OpenShell bug and document reproduction steps
  • Compare alternatives for a specific feature need
  • Prepare a structured issue for human review
NVIDIA/OpenShell1.7만2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

NVIDIA의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고