Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apple LeanUX++ design workflow, journey schema, emotional arc patterns, and CLI UX patterns. Load when transitioning from discovery to visualization or when designing journey artifacts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4
Journey Mapping Emotional Design TUI Prototyping Integration Check
| | | |
v v v v
"What's the flow?" "How should it feel?" "What does it look?" "Does it connect?"
schema_version: 1
journey:
name: "{Goal Name}"
goal: "{What user is trying to accomplish}"
persona: "{User persona reference}"
emotional_arc:
start: "{Initial emotional state}"
middle: "{Journey emotional state}"
end: "{Final emotional state}"
steps:
- id: 1
name: "{Step Name}"
command: "{CLI command or action}"
tui_mockup: |
+-- Step N: {Name} -----------------------------------------+
| {ASCII representation of CLI output} |
| ${variable} <-- tracked artifact |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
shared_artifacts:
- name: "{artifact_name}"
source: "{single source of truth file}"
displayed_as: "${variable}"
consumers: ["{list of places this appears}"]
emotional_state:
entry: "{How user feels entering step}"
exit: "{How user feels after step}"
integration_checkpoint: |
{What must be validated before proceeding}
failure_modes:
- "{What can go wrong at this step — used by DISTILL for error scenario generation}"
- "{Another failure scenario}"
gherkin: |
Scenario: {Step description}
Given {precondition}
When {action}
Then {observable outcome}
And shared artifact "${variable}" matches source
integration_validation:
shared_artifact_consistency:
- artifact: "{name}"
must_match_across: [1, 2, 3]
failure_message: "{Integration error description}"
changelog:
- date: "{YYYY-MM-DD}"
feature: "{feature-id}"
change: "{What changed in this update}"
Start: Anxious/Uncertain | Middle: Focused/Engaged | End: Confident/Satisfied Use when: Complex multi-step operations
Start: Curious | Middle: Exploring | End: Delighted Use when: Learning new features
Start: Frustrated | Middle: Hopeful | End: Relieved Use when: Fixing issues or debugging
tool [noun] [verb] or tool [verb] [noun]crafter agent create or crafter create agentResponsive: print something in <100ms | Progress: show for long operations | Transparent: show what is happening | Recoverable: clear errors with suggested fixes
Implement --help on every command | Make help discoverable | Provide contextual suggestions
Three artifact types produced:
journey-{name}-visual.md): ASCII flow diagram with emotional annotations and TUI mockups per stepjourney-{name}.yaml): Machine-readable journey definition following schema abovejourney-{name}.feature): Testable acceptance scenarios from each journey stepAll artifacts go to docs/feature/{feature-id}/discuss/.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Architectural style selection decision matrices, trade-off analysis, structural enforcement rules, and combination patterns. Load when choosing or evaluating architecture styles.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.