Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Mom Test questioning toolkit, JTBD analysis, interview conduct, assumption testing framework, and hypothesis design
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Understand if problem is real and worth solving.
Map the job-to-be-done and desired outcomes.
Challenge beliefs and uncover truth.
Distinguish interest from commitment.
Understand impact and urgency.
Do: Ask about past specifics | Open, non-directive questions | Seek commitment not praise | Keep informal | 80% listening | Talk about their life first
Avoid: Future behavior questions | Leading questions | Accepting compliments as validation | Talking >20% | Mentioning idea before understanding problem | Formal settings
Challenge when: belief without evidence | prediction about future | negative feedback dismissed | skipping to solution | single data point relied on
Tone: curious and supportive, not confrontational -- goal is truth-seeking.
| Category | Core Question |
|---|---|
| Value | Will customers want this? |
| Usability | Can customers use this? |
| Feasibility | Can we build this? |
| Viability | Does this work for our business? |
| Factor | Weight | Low (1) | Medium (2) | High (3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impact if wrong | 3 | Minor adjustment | Significant rework | Solution fails |
| Uncertainty | 2 | Have data | Mixed signals | Speculation |
| Ease of testing | 1 | Days, low cost | Weeks, moderate | Months, high cost |
Risk Score = (Impact x 3) + (Uncertainty x 2) + (Ease x 1)
| Priority | Score | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Test first | > 12 | Immediate |
| Test soon | 8-12 | Schedule |
| Test later | < 8 | Backlog |
We believe [doing X] for [user type] will achieve [outcome].
We will know this is TRUE when we see [measurable signal].
We will know this is FALSE when we see [counter-signal or absence of signal].
| Category | Methods |
|---|---|
| Value | Landing page, Fake door, Mom Test interviews |
| Usability | Prototype testing, 5-second tests, Task completion |
| Feasibility | Spike, Technical prototype, Expert review |
| Viability | Lean Canvas review, Stakeholder interviews |
| Result | Criteria | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Proven | >80% meet success criteria | Proceed |
| Disproven | <20% meet criteria | Pivot or kill |
| Inconclusive | 20-80% | Increase sample, try different method, segment |
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Architectural style selection decision matrices, trade-off analysis, structural enforcement rules, and combination patterns. Load when choosing or evaluating architecture styles.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.