본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

nw-persona-jtbd-analysis

Structured persona creation and JTBD analysis methodology - persona templates, ODI job step tables, pain point mapping, success metric quantification, and multi-persona segmentation

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.9 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Persona and JTBD Analysis

Use during Phase 1 (GATHER) when the user lacks clear personas or the "Who" section needs rigorous definition. Provides structured alternative to ad-hoc persona descriptions.

Persona Template

For each user type, build a complete persona:

## Persona: {Name}

**Who**: {Role description -- one sentence capturing relationship to product}
**Demographics**:
- {Characteristic 1: e.g., technical proficiency level}
- {Characteristic 2: e.g., frequency of interaction}
- {Characteristic 3: e.g., environment/context of use}
- {Characteristic 4: e.g., primary motivation}

**Jobs-to-be-Done**: (see Job Step Table below)

**Pain Points**:
- {Pain 1} -- maps to Job Step: {step name}
- {Pain 2} -- maps to Job Step: {step name}

**Success Metrics**:
- {Quantified outcome 1: e.g., "Task completed in < 2 minutes"}
- {Quantified outcome 2: e.g., "Zero manual configuration steps"}

Job Step Table

Each persona has job steps describing what they accomplish. Steps follow ODI format.

Job StepGoalDesired Outcome
{Verb}{What the user wants to achieve}Minimize {metric} of {undesirable state}

Rules for Job Steps

  • Job Steps are always verbs: Discover, Validate, Install, Configure, Monitor, Recover
  • Goals describe what the user wants, not what the system does
  • Desired Outcomes use ODI format: "Minimize [time/effort/risk/likelihood] of [undesirable state]"
  • Each step maps to a workflow point where value is created or destroyed

Example Job Step Table

Job StepGoalDesired Outcome
DiscoverFind the right tool for the taskMinimize time to evaluate fit
InstallGet the tool running locallyMinimize steps to working state
ConfigureAdapt to local environmentMinimize likelihood of misconfiguration
VerifyConfirm correct installationMinimize uncertainty about readiness
StartBegin productive workMinimize time from install to first output

Pain Point Mapping

Every pain point maps to a specific job step. Pain points without a corresponding step indicate either a missing step or irrelevant pain point.

Pain Point: "I don't know if the tool supports my OS"
  -> Job Step: Discover
  -> Desired Outcome: Minimize uncertainty about compatibility

Pain Point: "Installation fails silently with no error message"
  -> Job Step: Install
  -> Desired Outcome: Minimize time to diagnose installation failures

Prioritize: pain points on high-frequency job steps deserve attention first.

Success Metric Quantification

Every success metric needs a number or threshold. Qualitative metrics ("easy to use") are not actionable.

QualitativeQuantified
"Easy to install""Install completed in < 2 minutes with zero manual steps"
"Fast startup""First productive output within 30 seconds of launch"
"Reliable""Zero silent failures; all errors produce actionable messages"
"Intuitive""New user completes core task without reading documentation"

Multi-Persona Segmentation

Different users have fundamentally different jobs even when using the same product. Segment by relationship to the product.

Common axes: Frequency (first-time vs returning vs power user) | Role (end user vs admin vs developer) | Context (individual vs team vs CI/CD) | Motivation (exploration vs production vs evaluation)

Example: Same Product, Different Jobs

PersonaPrimary JobKey Difference
ExplorerEvaluate the tool quicklyNeeds fast time-to-value, minimal commitment
ReturnerResume work after absenceNeeds state preservation, quick re-orientation
DeployerInstall for a teamNeeds configuration management, multi-user setup
AutomatorIntegrate into CI/CD pipelineNeeds scriptability, headless operation, exit codes

Each persona gets their own Job Step table because workflows differ. Do not merge personas -- JTBD analysis value comes from surfacing differences.

Integration with Story Crafting

After completing persona analysis, feed results into LeanUX user story template:

  1. Persona Who -> populated from persona template
  2. Persona Pain Points -> inform story Problem section
  3. Job Step Desired Outcomes -> inform AC (ODI outcomes translate to testable criteria)
  4. Success Metrics -> inform NFR requirements in handoff package

Cross-reference: use bdd-requirements skill for Example Mapping once personas established. Use jtbd-workflow-selection skill to determine workflow for resulting stories.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nWave-ai/nWave6222026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nWave-ai/nWave6222026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nWave-ai/nWave6222026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nWave-ai/nWave6222026년 9월 16일 업데이트

5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nWave-ai/nWave6222026년 9월 16일 업데이트

Architectural style selection decision matrices, trade-off analysis, structural enforcement rules, and combination patterns. Load when choosing or evaluating architecture styles.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nWave-ai/nWave6222026년 9월 16일 업데이트

nWave-ai의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고