Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Angular framework expert including components, services, RxJS, templates, and testing
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
@Input() values are read-only from the child's perspective; communicate back to the parent via @Output() events or shared services.takeUntilDestroyed(), the async pipe, or DestroyRef; uncleaned subscriptions are the #1 Angular memory leak vector.OnPush change detection for non-trivial components — default change detection triggers on every event everywhere in the tree; OnPush triggers only on input reference changes.any type assertions to bypass TypeScript — type-unsafe code causes runtime errors that strict mode would catch at compile time; use proper types or generics instead.| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Using NgModule for new components | Legacy pattern deprecated since Angular 17 | Use standalone components |
| Direct DOM manipulation with ElementRef | Breaks SSR and web worker compatibility | Use Angular renderer or signals |
| Not unsubscribing from Observables | Memory leaks accumulate across component lifecycle | Use async pipe or takeUntilDestroyed() |
| Default change detection on data-heavy components | Unnecessary full-tree checks on every event | Use OnPush change detection strategy |
| Deeply nested imperative subscriptions | Hard to test, lifecycle leak risk | Prefer async pipe in template |
Using any type to bypass compiler | Runtime errors that TypeScript would prevent | Use proper types or unknown with type guards |
This expert skill consolidates 1 individual skills:
Before starting:
cat .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
After completing: Record any new patterns or exceptions discovered.
ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.