Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when you need semantic retrieval from perpetual memory at query time. Parses query intent, searches vector store, ranks by relevance and recency, and injects context. Complements memory-search.cjs with the perpetual_memory LanceDB table.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Semantic retrieval from the perpetual memory vector store at query time. Parses
query intent, searches the perpetual_memory LanceDB table, ranks results by
relevance and recency, and returns structured context for injection into agent
prompts.
Core principle: Every agent should be able to recall any past interaction instantly by meaning, not by filename or keyword. Auto-recall is the read side of the perpetual memory architecture.
Do NOT use for:
pnpm search:code instead)memory-search.cjs for that)perpetual-memory skill for writes)| Tool | Searches | Use For |
|---|---|---|
pnpm search:code | Code files (BM25+semantic) | Finding code patterns |
memory-search.cjs | Markdown memory files | Searching learnings/decisions/issues |
| auto-recall | perpetual_memory table | Recalling past interactions |
Auto-recall is complementary -- it searches a different index (the perpetual memory vector store) that contains auto-captured interaction summaries rather than manually-written markdown entries.
Before searching, classify the query intent:
| Intent Type | Query Pattern | Search Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Decision | "Why did we choose X", "What was decided" | Filter: category=decision |
| Issue | "Have we seen this error before" | Filter: category=issue |
| Pattern | "How do we usually handle X" | Filter: category=pattern |
| Learning | "What did we learn about X" | Filter: category=learning |
| General | Any other query | No category filter |
# Basic semantic search
node .claude/tools/cli/auto-embed.cjs --query "how does the routing guard handle Write operations" --limit 10
# Or via the skill script
node .claude/skills/auto-recall/scripts/main.cjs --query "JWT refresh token pattern" --limit 5
Results are ranked by cosine similarity from LanceDB. For time-sensitive queries, apply a recency boost:
final_score = similarity * 0.7 + recency_score * 0.3
where recency_score = max(0, 1 - (days_since_creation / 30))
This ensures recent interactions are slightly preferred when similarity is close.
Format retrieved memories for agent prompt injection:
## Recalled Context (from perpetual memory)
1. [decision] (sim=0.87, 2d ago, agent=architect)
Chose JWT RS256 over HS256 for key rotation support. ADR-045.
2. [learning] (sim=0.82, 5d ago, agent=developer)
Token refresh requires httpOnly cookies to prevent XSS.
3. [issue] (sim=0.74, 1d ago, agent=qa)
JWT expiry not propagated to frontend. Workaround in auth.middleware.ts:47.
# Semantic query
node .claude/skills/auto-recall/scripts/main.cjs --query "routing guard behavior"
# Query with category filter
node .claude/skills/auto-recall/scripts/main.cjs --query "auth decision" --category decision
# Query with limit
node .claude/skills/auto-recall/scripts/main.cjs --query "memory system" --limit 5
# Query with recency boost
node .claude/skills/auto-recall/scripts/main.cjs --query "recent changes" --recency-boost
# Output as JSON
node .claude/skills/auto-recall/scripts/main.cjs --query "search" --json
Agents should invoke auto-recall at the start of significant tasks:
// At task start, recall relevant context
Skill({ skill: 'auto-recall' });
// Then query for task-relevant history
// node .claude/skills/auto-recall/scripts/main.cjs --query "<task description>" --limit 5
This provides agents with historical context about similar past work, preventing repeated mistakes and leveraging prior decisions.
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Using auto-recall for code search | Wrong index; code is in BM25/semantic code index | Use pnpm search:code for code discovery |
| Injecting all results into context | Low-similarity results pollute the prompt | Filter to similarity > 0.5 before injecting |
| Blocking task on recall failure | Perpetual memory is a bonus, not a dependency | Gracefully degrade: proceed without recall |
| Recalling without specifying limit | Unbounded results consume too many tokens | Always set --limit (default: 10) |
| Trusting recall over fresh code analysis | Past context may be outdated | Use recall as starting context, verify current |
Before starting:
Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
After completing:
.claude/context/memory/learnings.md.claude/context/memory/issues.md.claude/context/memory/decisions.mdASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.