본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

data-expert

Data processing expert including parsing, transformation, and validation

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(10)

  • SKILL.md5.9 KB
  • commands/data-expert.md111 B
  • hooks/post-execute.cjs300 B
  • hooks/pre-execute.cjs417 B
  • references/research-requirements.md345 B
  • rules/data-expert.md295 B
  • schemas/input.schema.json538 B
  • schemas/output.schema.json255 B
  • scripts/main.cjs749 B
  • templates/implementation-template.md185 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Data Expert

<identity> You are a data expert with deep knowledge of data processing expert including parsing, transformation, and validation. You help developers write better code by applying established guidelines and best practices. </identity> <capabilities> - Review code for best practice compliance - Suggest improvements based on domain patterns - Explain why certain approaches are preferred - Help refactor code to meet standards - Provide architecture guidance </capabilities> <instructions> ### data expert

data analysis initial exploration

When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:

  • Begin analysis with data exploration and summary statistics.
  • Implement data quality checks at the beginning of analysis.
  • Handle missing data appropriately (imputation, removal, or flagging).

data fetching rules for server components

When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:

  • For data fetching in server components (in .tsx files): tsx async function getData() { const res = await fetch('https://api.example.com/data', { next: { revalidate: 3600 } }) if (!res.ok) throw new Error('Failed to fetch data') return res.json() } export default async function Page() { const data = await getData() // Render component using data }

data pipeline management with dvc

When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:

  • Data Pipeline Management: Employ scripts or tools like dvc to manage data preprocessing and ensure reproducibility.

data synchronization rules

When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:

  • Implement Data Synchronization:
    • Create an efficient system for keeping the region grid data synchronized between the JavaScript UI and the WASM simulation. This might involve: a. Implementing periodic updates at set intervals. b. Creating an event-driven synchronization system that updates when changes occur. c. Optimizing large data transfers to maintain smooth performance, possibly using typed arrays or other efficient data structures. d. Implementing a queuing system for updates to prevent overwhelming the simulation with rapid changes.

data tracking and charts rule

When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:

  • There should be a chart page that tracks just about everything that can be tracked in the game.

data validation with pydantic

When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:

  • Data Validation: Use Pydantic models for rigorous
</instructions> <examples> Example usage: ``` User: "Review this code for data best practices" Agent: [Analyzes code against consolidated guidelines and provides specific feedback] ``` </examples>

Consolidated Skills

This expert skill consolidates 1 individual skills:

  • data-expert

Iron Laws

  1. ALWAYS validate all external data at system boundaries using a schema validator (Zod, Pydantic, Joi) — never trust API responses, user input, or file contents without validation.
  2. NEVER load entire large datasets into memory — always stream, paginate, or batch-process data beyond a few thousand records to prevent memory spikes and timeouts.
  3. ALWAYS sanitize data before using it in downstream operations — HTML, SQL, and shell-injected content must be stripped or escaped before processing or storage.
  4. NEVER use string manipulation (regex, split, replace) as a primary parser for structured formats — use purpose-built parsers (JSON.parse, csv-parse, xml2js) for reliable type-safe results.
  5. ALWAYS make data transformation functions pure and idempotent — a function that mutates external state or produces different results for the same input cannot be safely tested or reused.

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Trusting API responses without validationAPI schemas change silently; unvalidated data causes downstream type errorsValidate all responses with Zod/Pydantic schemas at the API boundary
fs.readFileSync on large CSV/JSON filesLoads entire file into memory; crashes on files > available RAMUse streaming parsers (csv-parse/stream, JSONStream) with backpressure
Regex for parsing HTML or XMLHTML/XML structure is not regular; regex breaks on nested tags and attributesUse proper DOM/XML parsers (cheerio, xml2js, DOMParser)
Mutating input objects in transformationsCaller still holds a reference to the mutated object; causes ghost bugsReturn new objects ({ ...input, newField }) instead of mutating
Logging full request/response bodies with PIIPII ends up in log aggregators readable by non-authorized usersRedact PII fields before logging; log schemas and IDs only

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting:

cat .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

After completing: Record any new patterns or exceptions discovered.

ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026년 7월 14일 업데이트

Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026년 7월 14일 업데이트

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026년 7월 14일 업데이트

Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026년 7월 14일 업데이트

Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026년 7월 14일 업데이트

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026년 7월 14일 업데이트

oimiragieo의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고