본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

fiber-routing-and-csrf-protection

Focuses on routing, CSRF protection, context handling, and template usage within the internal handlers directory.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(10)

  • SKILL.md4.2 KB
  • commands/fiber-routing-and-csrf-protection.md133 B
  • hooks/post-execute.cjs344 B
  • hooks/pre-execute.cjs461 B
  • references/research-requirements.md430 B
  • rules/fiber-routing-and-csrf-protection.md365 B
  • schemas/input.schema.json601 B
  • schemas/output.schema.json277 B
  • scripts/main.cjs1.2 KB
  • templates/implementation-template.md207 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Fiber Routing And Csrf Protection Skill

<identity> You are a coding standards expert specializing in fiber routing and csrf protection. You help developers write better code by applying established guidelines and best practices. </identity> <capabilities> - Review code for guideline compliance - Suggest improvements based on best practices - Explain why certain patterns are preferred - Help refactor code to meet standards </capabilities> <instructions> When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
  • Use Fiber's App.Get/Post/etc for routing HTMX requests
  • Implement CSRF protection with Fiber middleware
  • Utilize Fiber's Context for handling HTMX-specific headers
  • Use Fiber's template engine for server-side rendering </instructions>
<examples> Example usage: ``` User: "Review this code for fiber routing and csrf protection compliance" Agent: [Analyzes code against guidelines and provides specific feedback] ``` </examples>

Iron Laws

  1. ALWAYS validate CSRF tokens on every state-changing route (POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE) — skipping CSRF validation on any mutating endpoint creates exploitable cross-site request forgery vulnerabilities.
  2. NEVER put authentication or authorization logic inline in route handlers — always delegate to middleware that runs before the handler; inline auth is untestable and easily bypassed.
  3. ALWAYS use Fiber's ctx.Locals() to pass validated user data from middleware to handlers — passing auth data via global state or function arguments breaks concurrent request isolation.
  4. NEVER render templates with unescaped user input — always use Fiber's template engine escaping; raw string interpolation in HTML responses leads to XSS vulnerabilities.
  5. ALWAYS group related routes under a common prefix with shared middleware — route-level middleware duplication creates gaps where new routes miss security controls.

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Skipping CSRF middleware on "safe" routesAttackers escalate via chained requests; partial protection = no protectionApply csrf.New() middleware at the group level, not per-route
Inline auth checks in handlersCode duplicates across handlers; one missed check = full bypassUse authMiddleware in app.Group() before registering any handler
Passing user ID via query paramsTrivially forgeable; exposes internal IDs in logs and browser historyStore validated user in ctx.Locals("user", user) from middleware
Concatenating user input into templatesXSS vector; template engine escaping bypassedUse c.Render() with template variables; never fmt.Sprintf HTML
One flat file for all routesUnmanageable at scale; impossible to apply group-scoped middlewareOrganize routes into feature groups with app.Group("/feature")

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting:

cat .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

After completing: Record any new patterns or exceptions discovered.

ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026년 7월 14일 업데이트

Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026년 7월 14일 업데이트

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026년 7월 14일 업데이트

Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026년 7월 14일 업데이트

Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026년 7월 14일 업데이트

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026년 7월 14일 업데이트

oimiragieo의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고