Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Load and synthesize framework architecture context for reflection and planning tasks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Provide a consistent, source-anchored model of this framework so agents can reason about system-level behavior without guessing.
memory, agents, workflows, hooks, or all) — loading all sources for a narrow task wastes tokens and buries relevant signals.missing source: <path> rather than silently omitting a section — silent omissions cause downstream agents to make decisions on incomplete context.| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Skipping context load before reflection | Reflection uses stale or hallucinated routing/memory assumptions | Always invoke framework-context first; never reflect from memory alone |
Loading full all scope for a narrow task | Token budget consumed by irrelevant sections; key signal buried | Pass --scope memory or --scope agents to limit output to what's needed |
| Inferring file paths from naming conventions | Paths change; inferred paths break agent pipelines | Always read canonical sources and report actual paths found |
| Writing to framework files inside this skill | Bypasses creator workflow and post-creation integration steps | Use appropriate creator/updater skill for any write operations |
| Silently omitting sections when source is missing | Consumer assumes context is complete; makes decisions on gaps | Report missing source: <path> explicitly for every unresolvable section |
scope argument: memory | agents | workflows | hooks | allallRead only what is required by scope:
.claude/docs/MEMORY_SYSTEM.md.claude/context/agent-registry.json, .claude/lib/routing/routing-table.cjs.claude/hooks/reflection/reflection-queue-processor.cjs, .claude/hooks/reflection/reflection-step0-guard.cjs.claude/docs/@ENTERPRISE_WORKFLOWS.md.claude/CLAUDE.mdOutput sections in this exact order:
Each section must include:
scope != all, return only relevant section(s)missing source: <path>Return markdown only; do not write framework files from this skill.
</execution_process> </instructions>
<examples> <usage_example> **Example Invocations**:// Full framework model
Skill({ skill: 'framework-context' });
// Memory-only context for reflection prep
Skill({ skill: 'framework-context', args: '--scope memory' });
// Workflow/hook-only context for integration analysis
Skill({ skill: 'framework-context', args: '--scope workflows' });
</usage_example> </examples>
Before starting:
Get-Content .claude/context/memory/learnings.md -TotalCount 120
After completing:
.claude/context/memory/learnings.md.claude/context/memory/issues.md.claude/context/memory/decisions.mdASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.