Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Detect missing docs, undocumented files, project health issues, and coverage gaps on session start or on-demand. Scans for README gaps, TODO/FIXME counts, and test coverage holes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
This skill performs a structured health-check scan on session start (or on-demand) to surface:
Use this skill before beginning any significant work in an unfamiliar codebase, or as a recurring quality gate.
NO HEALTH REPORT WITHOUT EVIDENCE — EVERY FINDING MUST CITE FILE AND LINE
Never report a gap without a concrete file path and (when applicable) line number. Vague summaries are not actionable.
Command:
# Find source files without a README at their directory level
find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.cjs" -o -name "*.mjs" -o -name "*.py" \) \
! -path "*/node_modules/*" ! -path "*/.git/*" ! -path "*/dist/*" ! -path "*/build/*" \
-print | while read f; do
dir=$(dirname "$f")
if [ ! -f "$dir/README.md" ] && [ ! -f "$dir/index.md" ]; then
echo "NO_README: $f"
fi
done | sort -u
Expected output: Lines of form NO_README: ./src/utils/helper.ts
Verify: Exit code 0; non-empty output means gaps exist.
Command:
# Find source files that have no matching test file
find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.cjs" \) \
! -path "*/node_modules/*" ! -path "*/.git/*" ! -path "*/dist/*" \
! -path "*/tests/*" ! -path "*/__tests__/*" ! -path "*.test.*" ! -path "*.spec.*" \
-print | while read src; do
base=$(basename "$src" | sed 's/\.[^.]*$//')
dir=$(dirname "$src")
if ! find . -path "*/tests/*" -name "${base}.test.*" 2>/dev/null | grep -q .; then
if ! find . -name "${base}.test.*" 2>/dev/null | grep -q .; then
echo "NO_TEST: $src"
fi
fi
done
Expected output: Lines of form NO_TEST: ./src/auth/jwt.ts
Verify: Exit code 0; any NO_TEST lines are coverage gaps.
Command:
grep -rn --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" --include="*.cjs" --include="*.mjs" --include="*.py" \
-E "(TODO|FIXME|HACK|XXX):" \
--exclude-dir=node_modules --exclude-dir=.git --exclude-dir=dist \
. 2>/dev/null | sort
Expected output: ./src/auth/jwt.ts:42: // TODO: add token rotation
Verify: Total count printed via | wc -l appended to output.
Command:
# Find exported functions/classes without JSDoc or inline comment above them
grep -rn --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" -E "^export (function|class|const|async function)" \
--exclude-dir=node_modules --exclude-dir=dist --exclude-dir=.git \
. 2>/dev/null | while IFS=: read file line content; do
prevline=$((line - 1))
comment=$(sed -n "${prevline}p" "$file" 2>/dev/null | grep -E "(/\*|\*/|//)" || true)
if [ -z "$comment" ]; then
echo "NO_DOC: $file:$line $content"
fi
done
Expected output: NO_DOC: ./src/api/router.ts:15 export function handleRequest
Verify: Exit code 0.
After running Steps 1–4, produce a structured report with:
src/auth/, add tests for jwt.ts")Report format:
## Gap Detection Report — {{date}}
| Category | Count |
| ---------- | ----- |
| NO_README | {{n}} |
| NO_TEST | {{n}} |
| TODO/FIXME | {{n}} |
| NO_DOC | {{n}} |
### Priority Gaps
1. {{file:line}} — {{reason}}
...
### Recommended Actions
- [ ] {{action}}
...
Verify: Report written to .claude/context/tmp/gap-detection-report-{{date}}.md.
Input validated against schemas/input.schema.json before execution.
Output contract defined in schemas/output.schema.json.
Before starting:
Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md for prior gap scans and known chronic issues.
After completing:
.claude/context/memory/learnings.md with date and repo path.claude/context/memory/issues.mdnode_modules/, dist/, .git/ directoriesproactive-audit — broader audit including hook syntax and agent consistencytdd — use after gap-detection to address test coverage gapsdebugging — follow-up for runtime gaps identified during scancontext-compressor — compress large gap reports before handing offdeveloper (primary — runs on feature work)qa (primary — runs before test strategy)architect (supporting — runs before architecture reviews)planner (supporting — runs before planning sessions)아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.