Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Sequential thinking and structured problem solving. Break down complex problems into steps with revision and branching capabilities. Use for multi-step analysis, planning, and hypothesis verification.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Optional standalone executor: The skill can run .claude/tools/optimization/sequential-thinking/executor.py. Requirements:
winget install Python.Python.3.12 (Windows), brew install python@3.12 (macOS).pip install mcpFull functionality: The Python script .claude/tools/optimization/sequential-thinking/executor.py must exist for standalone executor runs. Run node .claude/tools/cli/doctor.mjs to verify; doctor warns if the executor is missing.
Frameworks: Polya: (1) Understand the problem (2) Devise a plan (3) Carry out the plan (4) Look back. IDEAL: Identify → Define context → Explore strategies → Act on best → Look back and learn.
Process: Be systematic: preview outcomes, sustain effort, examine from multiple angles, pace and self-monitor. Use diagrams, tables, patterns; break into subgoals; work backwards when useful.
Hacks: Number thoughts (thoughtNumber, totalThoughts); allow revision and branching. Start with an initial step count and refine. Use the MCP sequential-thinking tool for multi-step analysis and hypothesis verification when the full scope is unclear.
No cert. Problem-solving frameworks: Polya (Understand → Plan → Execute → Look back), IDEAL (Identify → Define → Explore → Act → Look back). Skill data: Systematic steps; preview outcomes; sustain effort; revise and branch; use diagrams/tables/patterns.
Suggested hooks: Optional: pre-plan or pre-complex-task hook to suggest sequential-thinking for multi-step tasks. Use with planner (primary) for planning and master-orchestrator when decomposing work.
Workflows: Use with planner (primary). Flow: complex task → load sequential-thinking → emit thoughts (MCP or executor) → revise → act. See core/router-decision for when router assigns planner.
This skill provides structured problem-solving through a flexible thinking process that can adapt and evolve. Each thought can build on, question, or revise previous insights.
Context Savings: ~97% reduction
Use the MCP sequential thinking tool directly:
// Via MCP tool
mcp__sequential -
thinking__sequentialthinking({
thought: 'First, let me analyze the problem...',
thoughtNumber: 1,
totalThoughts: 5,
nextThoughtNeeded: true,
});
A detailed tool for dynamic and reflective problem-solving through thoughts.
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
thought | string | Your current thinking step |
thoughtNumber | integer | Current thought number (1, 2, 3...) |
totalThoughts | integer | Estimated total thoughts needed |
nextThoughtNeeded | boolean | Whether another thought step is needed |
isRevision | boolean | If this thought revises previous thinking |
revisesThought | integer | Which thought number is being reconsidered |
branchFromThought | integer | Branching point thought number |
branchId | string | Identifier for current branch |
needsMoreThoughts | boolean | If more thoughts needed at the "end" |
totalThoughts up or down as you progressnextThoughtNeeded: false only when truly doneThe sequential thinking tool is available via MCP. Use it directly in your responses:
// Execute a thinking step
mcp__sequential -
thinking__sequentialthinking({
thought: 'Your analysis here...',
thoughtNumber: 1,
totalThoughts: 5,
nextThoughtNeeded: true,
});
MCP server configuration stored in config.json:
npx -y @modelcontextprotocol/server-sequential-thinking@modelcontextprotocol/server-sequential-thinking.claude/skills/mcp-converter/nextThoughtNeeded: false before the solution hypothesis has been verifiedtotalThoughts dynamically as problem complexity becomes clearisRevision: true and revisesThought: N| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed thought count | Thinking stops at an arbitrary estimate regardless of solution confidence | Set needsMoreThoughts: true and increase totalThoughts when complexity grows |
| No branching | Commits to the first approach without considering alternatives | Use branchFromThought to explore multiple solution paths before choosing |
| Skipping revisions | Incorrect assumptions propagate uncorrected through downstream thoughts | Mark all corrections with isRevision: true and revisesThought: N |
| Premature termination | Unverified hypothesis leads to incorrect or incomplete solutions | Verify the hypothesis explicitly before setting nextThoughtNeeded: false |
| No uncertainty markers | Overconfident conclusions mislead execution agents | Mark tentative thoughts explicitly; distinguish confident vs uncertain reasoning |
Before starting:
Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
After completing:
.claude/context/memory/learnings.md.claude/context/memory/issues.md.claude/context/memory/decisions.mdASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.