Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Svelte and SvelteKit expert including components, stores, and routing
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
$:) for reactivity, e.g. bind:valueWhen reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
components/auth-form.svelte).This expert skill consolidates 1 individual skills:
$:) in new code — use Svelte 5 runesload functions for data fetching in SvelteKit$state and $derived runes+error.svelte error boundaries for every route group that can fail| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Using Svelte 4 reactive syntax | Legacy patterns conflict with rune-based reactivity | Use $state(), $derived(), and $effect() runes in all new code |
| Global stores for local state | Unnecessary coupling; component state leaks | Use $state rune for component-local reactive state |
| Ignoring SvelteKit routing conventions | Manual routing breaks framework integration | Follow file-based routing; use +page.svelte and +layout.svelte |
Missing +error.svelte handlers | Unhandled route errors produce blank pages | Add +error.svelte to every route group that can fail |
| Skipping accessibility attributes | Screen readers and keyboard users cannot use the UI | Always add ARIA labels and test keyboard navigation |
Before starting:
cat .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
After completing: Record any new patterns or exceptions discovered.
ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.