본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

triage

Triage review findings interactively — approve, skip, or prioritize each issue. Use after /phx:review to filter findings before fixing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md3.6 KB
  • references/triage-patterns.md2.7 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Triage — Interactive Review Resolution

Walk through review findings one by one for human decision before committing to fixes.

Usage

/phx:triage .claude/plans/user-auth/reviews/user-auth-review.md
/phx:triage                  # Uses most recent review

Why Triage

After /phx:review produces findings, you have three options:

  1. Fix everything — /phx:plan .claude/plans/{slug}/reviews/...
  2. Triage first — /phx:triage (filter, then fix what matters)
  3. Handle manually — Read review, pick what to fix yourself

Best when review has 5+ findings and you want to prioritize.

Workflow

Step 1: Load Review

Read the review file. Parse all findings with severity.

Iron Law violations first: list findings that match an Iron Law at the top, recommended as "Fix it". The user still makes the call (Iron Law 6).

Step 2: Present ALL Findings for Batch Selection

Use AskUserQuestion with multiSelect: true. Start with severity shortcuts, then list individual findings:

AskUserQuestion:
  question: "Which findings do you want to fix? (Iron Law violations auto-included)"
  header: "Triage"
  multiSelect: true
  options:
    - label: "All BLOCKERs ({count})"
      description: "Fix all critical issues"
    - label: "All WARNINGs ({count})"
      description: "Fix all should-fix issues"
    - label: "[BLOCKER] {title 1}"
      description: "{file}:{line} — {brief description}"
    - label: "[WARNING] {title 2}"
      description: "{file}:{line} — {brief description}"

If >4 options, batch into groups of 4 with severity shortcuts in the first batch. Severity shortcuts select all findings of that level — user can mix shortcuts with individual picks.

AskUserQuestion discipline: decisions only — never use it to narrate progress. Every option carries {file}:{line} + counts so the user decides without opening the review file.

Step 3: Gather Context on Selected Items

For selected items, ask ONE batch follow-up: "Any specific approach for any of these?" If they say "just fix them", proceed.

Step 4: Generate Triage Summary

Write to .claude/plans/{slug}/reviews/{slug}-triage.md with Fix Queue (approved items with checkboxes), Skipped, and Deferred sections.

Step 5: Present Next Steps

Triage complete: {n} to fix, {n} skipped, {n} deferred.

1. Plan fixes — /phx:plan .claude/plans/{slug}/reviews/{slug}-triage.md
2. Fix directly — /phx:work (for simple fixes)
3. Review deferred items later
4. Capture solutions — /phx:compound (if patterns were solved)

Iron Laws

  1. Batch selection over one-by-one — Use multiSelect for efficiency
  2. User decides, not the agent — Present facts, don't push
  3. BLOCKERs cannot be skipped silently — Warn if user tries
  4. Capture user context — Every "fix it" should include any user guidance for better fixes
  5. Suggest compound after triage — If triage reveals solved patterns (root cause identified, fix known), mention /phx:compound
  6. NEVER auto-decide severity or auto-dismiss findings — the human assigns final priority; present the agent's severity as a recommendation, not a verdict

Integration with Workflow

/phx:review
       |
/phx:triage  ← YOU ARE HERE (interactive filtering)
       |
/phx:plan (with triage file) → /phx:work → /phx:compound

References

  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/triage-patterns.md — Common triage decisions

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

analyze

무료

Analyze a legacy app in any language before rewriting it in Elixir: inventory, features as goals, why each mechanism exists, runtime topology, external contracts. Use to start or refresh a rewrite.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix5672026년 10월 20일 업데이트

architect

무료

Design the idiomatic Elixir architecture for a rewrite: set the compatibility bar (ADR-000), consult phx specialists on open questions, then build contexts, ledger and ADRs. Use after /rewrite:analyze.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix5672026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Ash Framework — resources, actions, policies, aggregates, calculations, AshPhoenix.Form, LiveView, migrations. Use when generating resources via mix ash.codegen, editing changes, checks, types, validations, or domain code interfaces.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix5672026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Ash Framework — resources, actions, policies, aggregates; Use when generating resources via mix ash.codegen, editing…

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix5672026년 10월 20일 업데이트

assigns

무료

Compatibility alias for the Elixir/Phoenix plugin's LiveView assigns audit. Invoke explicitly with /lv:assigns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix5672026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Inspect LiveView socket assigns for memory bloat — missing temporary_assigns, unused assigns, unbounded lists needing streams, memory estimates. Use when LiveView memory grows or you need to add temporary_assigns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix5672026년 10월 20일 업데이트

oliver-kriska의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고