본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

memory-vault-architect

Use when a research note system needs architecture, when MOCs, frontmatter standards, and retrieval patterns must be designed for years of work, or when an existing vault has outgrown its structure and must migrate without breaking years of links.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md3.8 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Memory Vault Architect

When to use

Use this skill when the user needs an academic memory system that can survive multiple projects, long time horizons, bilingual notes, and repeated AI-assisted work. The source records it designs are maintained day to day through source-passport-ledger, and research-ritual-hooks automates the rituals that keep the vault alive. It is not for auditing whether sensitive participant data has been adequately anonymized before entering the vault, that is sensitive-data-anonymization-gate.

Inputs

  • Research domains.
  • Active projects.
  • Source types.
  • Preferred note tool, if any.
  • Required languages.
  • Collaboration and privacy constraints.
  • Retrieval goals.

Workflow

  1. Identify the vault's purpose, such as literature review, manuscript pipeline, clinical training, teaching, or grant work.
  2. Separate durable knowledge, active projects, source records, daily work, and archived material.
  3. Design MOCs for domains, projects, methods, people, institutions, and outputs.
  4. Define frontmatter fields for source passports, project notes, meeting notes, and synthesis notes.
  5. Specify retrieval patterns, including tags, aliases, backlinks, saved searches, and index notes.
  6. Define rules for AI-generated notes, human-reviewed notes, and uncertain claims.
  7. Provide a migration plan that avoids reorganizing everything at once.

Output

Return:

  • Vault objective.
  • Folder architecture.
  • MOC map.
  • Frontmatter schemas.
  • Source passport template.
  • Retrieval pattern.
  • Migration steps.
  • Maintenance ritual.
  • What to record at session end: the folder map decided, any MOC or frontmatter schemas created, and a handoff note naming the sensitive data lanes that need sensitive-data-anonymization-gate before population.

Verification

  • The architecture separates sources from interpretations.
  • The system works without relying on a single proprietary tool.
  • AI-generated content is visibly marked until reviewed.
  • Sensitive clinical or participant material has a protected lane.
  • The migration plan is small enough to execute.
  • Before closing: the source passport template is ready to hand to source-passport-ledger for day-to-day record keeping, and any protected lane is documented so sensitive material cannot be accidentally placed in an open folder.

Safety

Do not ask for private vault paths, credentials, raw clinical data, or participant identifiers. Use placeholder paths and anonymized examples unless the user explicitly provides safe local paths.

Example prompt

"Design a bilingual research vault for AI and mental health papers, manuscript drafts, Zotero notes, and reviewer response materials."

Expected smoke output:

  • Folder map.
  • MOC list.
  • Source passport frontmatter.
  • Retrieval rules for sources, claims, and manuscript outputs.

Türkçe kullanım notu

Bu beceri, yıllarca yaşayacak bir araştırma arşivinin mimarisini kurar. Kalıcı bilgi, aktif projeler, kaynak kayıtları ve günlük çalışma birbirinden ayrılır, MOC haritaları ve frontmatter şemaları geri çağırmayı tek aramaya indirir. Günlük işleyiş source-passport-ledger ve research-ritual-hooks becerileriyle yürür. Taşınma planı küçük adımlarla ilerler, her şeyi bir günde yeniden düzenlemeyi girişimde bulunulmaz. Hassas katmanlar arşive girmeden önce sensitive-data-anonymization-gate üzerinden geçirilir. Yapay zekâ tarafından üretilen notlar, insan incelemesinden geçene dek kasıtlı biçimde işaretlenir — arşiv içinde yapay zekâ katkısının görünür kalması bu etiketlemeye dayanır.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Use when a complete research workflow — its instructions, skills, data boundaries, and tool connections — must be assessed for portability across AI agents or environments, so each component is explicitly mapped before migration rather than assumed to transfer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026년 9월 6일 업데이트

Use when a Claude Code session loops, drifts from scope, claims a fix that CI rejects, hits context, PATH, or permission walls, or fails in a way another retry will not solve and a root cause diagnosis is needed instead.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026년 9월 6일 업데이트

Use when AI contribution metadata must match the actual workflow, when model alias and dated identifiers need auditing, when verified and fabricated citation counts feed a release decision, or when a venue's AI disclosure statement needs evidence behind it.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026년 9월 6일 업데이트

Use when a draft in Turkish, English, or both reads as AI-generated and needs revision that removes machine writing patterns and translation calques while preserving meaning, citations, statistics, and the author's voice.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026년 9월 6일 업데이트

Use when a reference list needs APA 7 cleanup, when DOIs must be confirmed real against Crossref or PubMed, when the user asks whether AI-suggested citations actually exist, or when a manuscript needs a citation hygiene pass before submission or defense.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026년 9월 6일 업데이트

Use when authorship order, CRediT contribution roles, or AI-assistance attribution must be recorded transparently for a manuscript, when an author dispute needs an evidence trail, or before a contributorship statement is required at submission; this skill maintains the human-attribution ledger of who contributed what and in which role (authorship order, CRediT taxonomy, revision responsibilities), which is distinct from the disclosure-metadata audit owned by ai-disclosure-auditor.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026년 9월 6일 업데이트

OnourImpram의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고