본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

gpt-5-4-prompting

Compose compact, structured prompts for coding, debugging, review, and research with Codex or GPT-5.4. This internal skill defines task scope, completion criteria, output format, verification steps, and evidence requirements using consistent XML tags.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Internal guidance for composing Codex and GPT-5.4 prompts for coding, review, diagnosis, and research tasks inside the Codex Claude Code plugin

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Define implementation scope and completion criteria
  • Include verification steps in debugging requests
  • Specify evidence requirements for code reviews
  • Set citation rules for research requests

포함된 파일(4)

  • SKILL.md3.6 KB
  • references/codex-prompt-antipatterns.md1.5 KB
  • references/codex-prompt-recipes.md4.1 KB
  • references/prompt-blocks.md4.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

GPT-5.4 Prompting

Use this skill when codex:codex-rescue needs to ask Codex or another GPT-5.4-based workflow for help.

Prompt Codex like an operator, not a collaborator. Keep prompts compact and block-structured with XML tags. State the task, the output contract, the follow-through defaults, and the small set of extra constraints that matter.

Core rules:

  • Prefer one clear task per Codex run. Split unrelated asks into separate runs.
  • Tell Codex what done looks like. Do not assume it will infer the desired end state.
  • Add explicit grounding and verification rules for any task where unsupported guesses would hurt quality.
  • Prefer better prompt contracts over raising reasoning or adding long natural-language explanations.
  • Use XML tags consistently so the prompt has stable internal structure.

Default prompt recipe:

  • <task>: the concrete job and the relevant repository or failure context.
  • <structured_output_contract> or <compact_output_contract>: exact shape, ordering, and brevity requirements.
  • <default_follow_through_policy>: what Codex should do by default instead of asking routine questions.
  • <verification_loop> or <completeness_contract>: required for debugging, implementation, or risky fixes.
  • <grounding_rules> or <citation_rules>: required for review, research, or anything that could drift into unsupported claims.

When to add blocks:

  • Coding or debugging: add completeness_contract, verification_loop, and missing_context_gating.
  • Review or adversarial review: add grounding_rules, structured_output_contract, and dig_deeper_nudge.
  • Research or recommendation tasks: add research_mode and citation_rules.
  • Write-capable tasks: add action_safety so Codex stays narrow and avoids unrelated refactors.

How to choose prompt shape:

  • Use built-in review or adversarial-review commands when the job is reviewing local git changes. Those prompts already carry the review contract.
  • Use task when the task is diagnosis, planning, research, or implementation and you need to control the prompt more directly.
  • Use task --resume-last for follow-up instructions on the same Codex thread. Send only the delta instruction instead of restating the whole prompt unless the direction changed materially.

Working rules:

  • Prefer explicit prompt contracts over vague nudges.
  • Use stable XML tag names that match the block names from the reference file.
  • Do not raise reasoning or complexity first. Tighten the prompt and verification rules before escalating.
  • Ask Codex for brief, outcome-based progress updates only when the task is long-running or tool-heavy.
  • Keep claims anchored to observed evidence. If something is a hypothesis, say so.

Prompt assembly checklist:

  1. Define the exact task and scope in <task>.
  2. Choose the smallest output contract that still makes the answer easy to use.
  3. Decide whether Codex should keep going by default or stop for missing high-risk details.
  4. Add verification, grounding, and safety tags only where the task needs them.
  5. Remove redundant instructions before sending the prompt.

Reusable blocks live in references/prompt-blocks.md. Concrete end-to-end templates live in references/codex-prompt-recipes.md. Common failure modes to avoid live in references/codex-prompt-antipatterns.md.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Forward tasks from Claude Code's rescue subagent to Codex through a helper script. This internal skill handles model and effort options, fresh or resumed runs, and write access, then returns the helper's output unchanged.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Hand off diagnosis or implementation work to Codex
  • Resume a previous Codex request
  • Start a fresh Codex run
openai/codex-plugin-cc3.4만2026년 7월 8일 업데이트

Present results returned by a Codex helper while preserving findings, severity, file references, and uncertainty. This internal guidance also covers reporting edited files, failed runs, and setup requirements, with user confirmation before fixing review findings.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Present review findings in order of severity
  • Keep observed evidence separate from inferences
  • Report files changed by Codex
openai/codex-plugin-cc3.4만2026년 7월 8일 업데이트

openai의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고