본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

convex-advisor

Review 72 hours of Convex deployment health events and trace read limits or conflicting writes to the responsible code. Receive prioritized performance, cost, and reliability findings with runtime evidence, source locations, and concrete fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Read the Convex deployment's 72h insights (read limits, OCC contention), root-cause each event in code, report evidence-backed perf/cost findings with fixes.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Investigating read limits and large table scans
  • Tracing conflicting writes to shared records
  • Reviewing deployment performance and cost issues
  • Prioritizing fixes using runtime evidence

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

<!-- GENERATED from convex-agents content/capabilities/convex-advisor.json — do not edit by hand. -->

Live-deployment advisor

Static review guesses; the deployment KNOWS. The official Convex MCP ships an insights tool with typed 72h health events per function — documentsReadLimit / bytesReadLimit (hard limit hits), documentsReadThreshold / bytesReadThreshold (approaching), occFailedPermanently / occRetried (write contention) — each carrying evidence (table_name, bytes_read, documents_read, occ document id + retry count). The advisor turns each event into a root-caused finding by reading the flagged function's actual code, and emits findings on the findings bus (specs/finding.schema.json) so fixers can be dispatched and launch-readiness can score.

Workflow

  1. GUARD: run deploy-guard step 0-1 — identify + announce the deployment being read. Reading insights/logs on prod is allowed read-only; never enable mutating prod access for an advisory pass.
  2. GATHER (deterministic, via the official Convex MCP): status → deployment selector; insights → the typed 72h events; tables → schema + row counts; functionSpec → the public/internal surface. The insights tool is only available on cloud dev/prod deployments when logged in as a user (not on previews or deploy-key-scoped contexts) and needs ~72h of traffic; if it returns nothing or is unavailable, say so and fall back to offering convex-reviewer — do NOT invent findings.
  3. ROOT-CAUSE each insight event by reading the flagged function's code:
    • bytesReadThreshold/Limit or documentsReadThreshold/Limit → look for .collect() / unindexed .filter() / missing pagination on the named table; the fix is an index + .withIndex, .take(n), or .paginate (convex-expert patterns), or an aggregate component for counting shapes.
    • occRetried / occFailedPermanently → look for read-modify-write hotspots on the named document (shared counters, status toggles); the fix is @convex-dev/sharded-counter, narrowing the read set, or moving contention to a workpool.
    • repeated failures in logs (status: failure) → classify: crash loop in a cron, validator rejections, unhandled error shapes.
  4. EMIT findings per specs/finding.schema.json: class perf/correctness/cost, severity from the insight kind (limit hits = high, thresholds = med, retried = med, permanent OCC failure = high), locus {kind: deployment, functionId, tableName}, evidence {kind: insight-event, detail: the raw event}, confidence: confirmed (the event happened — it is not a hypothesis), fixCapability + autofixable where the repair is mechanical.
  5. REPORT: findings ranked by severity, each with (a) the runtime evidence in one line ('messages:list read 4.2MB from messages 31× yesterday'), (b) the code-level root cause with file:line, (c) the concrete fix and which capability applies it. Offer to apply fixes; apply only on confirmation, then re-run insights after traffic to verify the trend, or re-run the static check immediately.
  6. Scope discipline: this is a health/perf/cost pass. Route authz findings to convex-authz, code-idiom findings to convex-reviewer, error triage to sentinel — emit a pointer finding rather than duplicating their work.

Rules

  • Evidence-not-vibes: every finding cites a real insight event, log line, or table stat — if the deployment has no evidence, the advisor has no findings (offer convex-reviewer instead).
  • Read-only by construction: an advisory pass never mutates any deployment and never enables prod mutation flags (deploy-guard discipline applies).
  • Root-cause in the code before reporting: an insight event names the symptom; the finding must name the line and the mechanism.
  • Emit on the findings bus (specs/finding.schema.json), confidence: confirmed — runtime events are facts, not hypotheses.
  • Severity from the event kind: limit-hit / permanent-OCC-failure = high; threshold / retried = med.
  • Stay in lane: perf/cost/health only — hand authz to convex-authz, style to convex-reviewer, error triage to sentinel.
  • Prefer component fixes over hand-rolls when they match (sharded-counter for OCC on counters, aggregate for count scans) — same bias as suggest.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Review code using shared OpenClaw instructions and a Python helper, while also following the target repository’s review requirements. This skill points to a common installation that supplies the actual review procedure.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing code with shared OpenClaw instructions
  • Applying repository-specific review requirements
  • Keeping shared review instructions up to date
openclaw/clawhub9.5천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Create and manage Axiom alert rules and notification destinations through its API. Connect alerts to email, Slack, or webhooks, check monitor history, and adjust thresholds and evaluation schedules to address excessive or missing alerts.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Set up error alerts and notification destinations
  • Tune monitors that send too many alerts
  • Investigate monitors that never trigger
openclaw/clawhub9.5천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

axiom-sre

무료

Investigate production incidents and bugs using logs, metrics, and code evidence. The skill guides hypothesis testing, root cause analysis, fix validation, and reusable investigation notes, with access to configured observability tools such as Axiom.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Investigate production outages and rising error rates
  • Trace causes using logs, metrics, and code
  • Reproduce bugs and validate minimal fixes
openclaw/clawhub9.5천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Design and build Axiom dashboards from logs or metrics, the numerical measurements of system behavior. Create charts, filters, and layouts for monitoring and reporting, or migrate existing Splunk and Grafana panels while validating queries against available data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Build a service health monitoring dashboard
  • Create interactive filters for investigating logs
  • Migrate dashboards from Splunk or Grafana
openclaw/clawhub9.5천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Drafts, previews, sends, and records emails for existing ClawHub content rights cases. It supports publisher removal notices and requester updates, requires approval of the final draft, and preserves the exact correspondence in the case record.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Preparing a skill removal notice for a publisher
  • Sending a requester a progress update or closure note
  • Preserving sent correspondence in an existing rights case
openclaw/clawhub9.5천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Apply ClawHub-specific rules when developing with Convex, including deployment targeting, runtime checks, data migrations, search performance, and skill statistics. It also directs specialized work to the appropriate companion skills.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Changing Convex functions or schemas
  • Planning production data migrations
  • Reviewing search query performance
openclaw/clawhub9.5천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

openclaw의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고