Use when designing or reviewing a public API, exported function signature, module boundary, exported type/interface, or any contract other code depends on
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when gathering or interpreting requirements, estimating effort, or communicating with stakeholders/customers about what to build
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Restate requests in different words and test reactions, separate estimates from targets from commitments, and start from yes when a request lands. Human-to-human collaboration material (pairing, rotation) lives in principles.md for attribution only.
Invoke when you're about to:
before-you-refactor)clean-code, security-and-trust-boundaries, etc.) handle code reviewRun the relevant items. If a request crosses areas (a UX call with an estimate attached), run each.
| Thought | Reality |
|---|---|
| "The user said they want X — I'll just build X." | What users say and what they do diverge. Restate in different words and ask one question that distinguishes interpretations. (97/97) |
| "I'll restate the requirement word-for-word so they know I heard them." | Verbatim restatement confirms the words, not the meaning. Restate in different words to surface the gap. (97/97) |
| "I know how a user will use this — I designed it." | You are not the user. Walk the non-power-user path before shipping the affordance; place help at the point of action, not the sidebar. (97/3) |
| "Two weeks is fine — I'll just commit to it." | A target accepted under pressure is not an estimate. Name what's being asked for: estimate, target, or commitment. (97/50) |
| "I'll give a precise number so it sounds credible." | Spurious precision (4.2 days) signals a target dressed as an estimate. Give a range from data, or say you do not have data yet. (97/50) |
| "The request is dumb — I'll push back and explain why." | Start from yes. Ask why first. The reason often reveals a real constraint, and sometimes the objection collapses. (97/77) |
| "I'll just escalate — someone will know." | Without what-you-tried, what-you-expected, and a reproducer, you are asking for magic. Deliver context with the question. (97/36) |
| # | Principle | Author |
|---|---|---|
| 97/3 | You Are Not the User | Giles Colborne |
| 97/36 | The Guru Myth | Ryan Brush |
| 97/50 | Learn to Estimate | Giovanni Asproni |
| 97/77 | Start from Yes | Alex Miller |
| 97/97 | Your Customers Do Not Mean What They Say | Nate Jackson |
See principles.md for the long-form distillations, citations, and source links.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Use when designing or reviewing a public API, exported function signature, module boundary, exported type/interface, or any contract other code depends on
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when considering, evaluating, or performing a refactor, restructure, cross-file rename, or cleanup
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when writing, reviewing, or changing build scripts, CI workflows, deploy pipelines, repo setup, or evaluating a new tool/dependency
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when writing or reviewing functions, classes, naming, or non-trivial logic (≥3 lines)
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when writing or reviewing error handling, floating-point math, concurrent code, remote calls, singletons/globals, hot-path data structures, or high-volume log statements
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when introducing, reviewing, or renaming a top-level type, table, or domain concept; or choosing where state lives (in-memory vs persistent)
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.