본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

review-skill-format

Review a SKILL.md file for compliance with the agentskills.io standard. Checks YAML frontmatter fields, required sections, line count limits, procedure step format, and registry synchronization. Use when a new skill needs format validation before merge, an existing skill has been modified and requires re-validation, performing a batch audit of all skills in a domain, or reviewing a contributor's skill submission in a pull request.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md12.7 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Review Skill Format

Validate a SKILL.md file against the agentskills.io open standard. This skill checks YAML frontmatter completeness, required section presence, procedure step format (Expected/On failure blocks), line count limits, and registry synchronization. Use this before merging any new or modified skill.

When to Use

  • A new skill has been authored and needs format validation before merge
  • An existing skill has been modified and needs re-validation
  • Performing a batch audit of all skills in a domain
  • Verifying a skill created by the create-skill meta-skill
  • Reviewing a contributor's skill submission in a pull request

Inputs

  • Required: Path to the SKILL.md file (e.g., skills/setup-vault/SKILL.md)
  • Optional: Strictness level (lenient or strict, default: strict)
  • Optional: Whether to check registry sync (default: yes)

Procedure

Step 1: Verify File Exists and Read Content

Confirm the SKILL.md file exists at the expected path and read its full content.

# Verify file exists
test -f skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md && echo "EXISTS" || echo "MISSING"

# Count lines
wc -l < skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md

Expected: File exists and content is readable. Line count is displayed.

On failure: If the file does not exist, check the path for typos. Verify the skill directory exists with ls skills/<skill-name>/. If the directory is missing, the skill has not been created yet — use create-skill first.

Step 2: Check YAML Frontmatter Fields

Parse the YAML frontmatter block (between --- delimiters) and verify all required and recommended fields are present.

Required fields:

  • name — matches directory name (kebab-case)
  • description — under 1024 characters, starts with a verb
  • license — typically MIT
  • allowed-tools — comma-separated or space-separated tool list

Recommended metadata fields:

  • metadata.author — author name
  • metadata.version — semantic version string
  • metadata.domain — one of the domains listed in skills/_registry.yml
  • metadata.complexity — one of: basic, intermediate, advanced
  • metadata.language — primary language or multi
  • metadata.tags — comma-separated, 3-6 tags, includes domain name
# Check required frontmatter fields exist
head -30 skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md | grep -q '^name:' && echo "name: OK" || echo "name: MISSING"
head -30 skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md | grep -q '^description:' && echo "description: OK" || echo "description: MISSING"
head -30 skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md | grep -q '^license:' && echo "license: OK" || echo "license: MISSING"
head -30 skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md | grep -q '^allowed-tools:' && echo "allowed-tools: OK" || echo "allowed-tools: MISSING"

Expected: All four required fields present. All six metadata fields present. name matches directory name. description is under 1024 characters.

On failure: Report each missing field as BLOCKING. If name does not match directory name, report as BLOCKING with the expected value. If description exceeds 1024 characters, report as SUGGEST with current length.

Step 3: Locale-Specific Validation (Translations Only)

If the frontmatter contains a locale field, the file is a translated SKILL.md. Perform these additional checks. If no locale field is present, skip this step.

  1. Translation frontmatter fields — Verify these five fields are present:

    • locale — target locale code (e.g., de, ja, zh-CN, es)
    • source_locale — origin locale (typically en)
    • source_commit — commit hash of the English source used for translation
    • translator — who or what produced the translation
    • translation_date — ISO 8601 date of translation
  2. Prose language scan — Sample 3-5 body paragraphs (outside code blocks, frontmatter, and headings). Verify the prose is written in the target locale, not English. Ignore: code blocks, inline code, tool names, field names, file paths, and English terms that have no standard translation in the target language.

  3. Code block identity check — Compare code blocks in the translated file against the English source at skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md. Code blocks must be identical (code is never translated). Flag any code block whose content differs from the English source.

# Check translation frontmatter fields
for field in "locale:" "source_locale:" "source_commit:" "translator:" "translation_date:"; do
  grep -q "^${field}\|^  ${field}" i18n/<locale>/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md \
    && echo "$field OK" || echo "$field MISSING"
done

Expected: All five translation fields present. Body paragraphs are in the target locale. Code blocks match the English source exactly.

On failure: Report missing translation fields as BLOCKING. If body paragraphs are in English despite a non-English locale, report as BLOCKING — the file has untranslated prose. If code blocks differ from the English source, report as BLOCKING — code must not be translated or modified.

Step 4: Check Required Sections

Verify all six required sections are present in the skill body (after frontmatter).

Required sections:

  1. ## When to Use
  2. ## Inputs
  3. ## Procedure (with ### Step N: sub-sections)
  4. ## Validation (may also appear as ## Validation Checklist)
  5. ## Common Pitfalls
  6. ## Related Skills
# Check each required section
for section in "## When to Use" "## Inputs" "## Procedure" "## Common Pitfalls" "## Related Skills"; do
  grep -q "$section" skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md && echo "$section: OK" || echo "$section: MISSING"
done

# Validation section may use either heading
grep -qE "## Validation( Checklist)?" skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md && echo "Validation: OK" || echo "Validation: MISSING"

# Report pitfall count (create-skill cap: 3-6; evolve-skill evicts instead of appending past 6).
# Counts dash and numbered items; `|| true` guards grep's exit-1-on-zero under `set -e`.
pitfall_count=$(sed -n '/^## Common Pitfalls/,/^## [^#]/p' skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md | grep -cE '^(- |[0-9]+\. )' || true)
echo "Common Pitfalls: $pitfall_count items (cap 3-6)"

Expected: All six sections present. Procedure section contains at least one ### Step sub-heading. Pitfall count is reported; 3-6 is within cap.

On failure: Report each missing section as BLOCKING. A skill without all six sections is non-compliant with the agentskills.io standard. Provide the section template from the create-skill meta-skill. A pitfall count above 6 is SUGGEST, not BLOCKING — the count check is advisory by design: it cannot distinguish a grandfathered over-cap skill from fresh over-cap authoring, so enforcement of the 3-6 cap for new skills lives in create-skill at authoring time; recommend evicting the lowest-rediscovery-cost pitfall per evolve-skill. A count of 0 with the section present means a non-list format (e.g. a table) — count manually.

Step 5: Check Procedure Step Format

Verify each procedure step follows the required pattern: numbered step title, context, code block(s), and Expected:/On failure: blocks.

For each ### Step N: sub-section, check:

  1. The step has a descriptive title (not just "Step N")
  2. At least one code block or concrete instruction exists
  3. An **Expected:** block is present
  4. An **On failure:** block is present

Expected: Every procedure step has both Expected: and On failure: blocks. Steps contain concrete code or instructions, not vague descriptions.

On failure: Report each step missing Expected/On failure as BLOCKING. If steps contain only vague instructions ("configure the system appropriately"), report as SUGGEST with a note to add concrete commands.

Step 6: Verify Line Count

Check that the SKILL.md is within the 500-line limit.

lines=$(wc -l < skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md)
[ "$lines" -le 500 ] && echo "OK ($lines lines)" || echo "OVER LIMIT ($lines lines > 500)"

Expected: Line count is 500 or fewer.

On failure: If over 500 lines, report as BLOCKING. Recommend using the refactor-skill-structure skill to extract code blocks >15 lines to references/EXAMPLES.md. Typical reduction: 20-40% by extracting extended examples.

Step 7: Check Registry Synchronization

Verify the skill is listed in skills/_registry.yml under the correct domain with matching metadata.

Check:

  1. Skill id exists under the correct domain section
  2. path matches <skill-name>/SKILL.md
  3. complexity matches frontmatter
  4. description is present (may be abbreviated)
  5. total_skills count at the top of the registry matches actual skill count
# Check if skill is in registry
grep -q "id: <skill-name>" skills/_registry.yml && echo "Registry: FOUND" || echo "Registry: NOT FOUND"

# Check path
grep -A1 "id: <skill-name>" skills/_registry.yml | grep -q "path: <skill-name>/SKILL.md" && echo "Path: OK" || echo "Path: MISMATCH"

Expected: Skill is listed in the registry under the correct domain with matching path and metadata. Total count is accurate.

On failure: If not found in registry, report as BLOCKING. Provide the registry entry template:

- id: skill-name
  path: skill-name/SKILL.md
  complexity: intermediate
  language: multi
  description: One-line description

Validation

  • SKILL.md file exists at the expected path
  • YAML frontmatter parses without errors
  • All four required frontmatter fields present (name, description, license, allowed-tools)
  • All six metadata fields present (author, version, domain, complexity, language, tags)
  • name field matches directory name
  • description is under 1024 characters
  • All six required sections present (When to Use, Inputs, Procedure, Validation, Common Pitfalls, Related Skills)
  • Pitfall count reported (3-6 within cap; above-cap or 0-with-section-present noted as SUGGEST)
  • Every procedure step has Expected: and On failure: blocks
  • Line count is 500 or fewer
  • Skill is listed in _registry.yml with correct domain, path, and metadata
  • total_skills count in registry is accurate
  • (Translations only) All five translation frontmatter fields present (locale, source_locale, source_commit, translator, translation_date)
  • (Translations only) Body paragraphs are in the target locale, not English
  • (Translations only) Code blocks are identical to the English source

Common Pitfalls

  • Checking frontmatter with regex only: YAML parsing can be subtle. A description: > multiline block looks different from description: "inline". Check both patterns when searching for fields.
  • Missing the Validation section variant: Some skills use ## Validation Checklist instead of ## Validation. Both are acceptable; check for either heading.
  • Forgetting registry total count: After adding a skill to the registry, the total_skills number at the top must also be incremented. This is a common miss in PRs.
  • Name vs. title confusion: The name field must be kebab-case matching the directory name. The # Title heading is human-readable and can differ (e.g., name: review-skill-format, title: # Review Skill Format).
  • Lenient mode skipping blockers: Even in lenient mode, missing required sections and frontmatter fields should still be flagged. Lenient mode only relaxes style and metadata recommendations.
  • Translated skills with English prose: A file with non-English frontmatter, non-English headings, and English body paragraphs passes all structural checks. Always verify body text language for translated skills — the locale field in frontmatter signals that prose must be in the target language, not English.

Related Skills

  • create-skill — The canonical format specification; use as the authoritative reference for what a valid SKILL.md looks like
  • update-skill-content — After format validation passes, use this to improve content quality
  • refactor-skill-structure — When a skill fails the line count check, use this to extract and reorganize
  • review-pull-request — When reviewing a PR that adds or modifies skills, combine PR review with format validation

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Execute structural metamorphosis using strangler fig migration, chrysalis phases, and interface preservation. Covers transformation planning, parallel running, progressive cutover, rollback design, and post-metamorphosis stabilization for system architecture evolution. Use when assess-form has classified the system as READY for transformation, when migrating from monolith to microservices, when replacing a core subsystem while dependents continue operating, or when any architectural change must be gradual rather than big-bang.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

pjt222/agent-almanac422026년 10월 21일 업데이트

adaptic

무료

Master skill composing the 5-step synoptic cycle for panoramic synthesis across multiple domains. Orchestrates meditate, expand-awareness, observe, awareness, integrate-gestalt, and express-insight into a coherent process that produces unified understanding rather than sequential compromise. Use when a problem genuinely spans 3+ domains and the interactions between domains matter more than depth in any one, when sequential analysis feels like compromise rather than integration, or before major architectural decisions affecting multiple stakeholders.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

pjt222/agent-almanac422026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Scaffold a new puzzle type across all 10+ pipeline integration points in jigsawR. Creates the core puzzle module, wires it into the unified pipeline (generation, positioning, rendering, adjacency), adds ggpuzzle geom/stat layers, updates DESCRIPTION and config.yml, extends the Shiny app, and creates a comprehensive test suite. Use when adding a completely new puzzle type to the package or following the 10-point integration checklist to ensure nothing is missed end-to-end.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

pjt222/agent-almanac422026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Add Rcpp or RcppArmadillo integration to an R package for high-performance C++ code. Covers setup, writing C++ functions, RcppExports generation, testing compiled code, and debugging. Use when an R function is too slow and profiling confirms a bottleneck, when you need to interface with existing C/C++ libraries, or when implementing algorithms (loops, recursion, linear algebra) that benefit from compiled code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

pjt222/agent-almanac422026년 10월 21일 업데이트

aikido

무료

Practice aikido as a defensive martial art emphasizing harmony, redirection, and controlled resolution. Covers centering and grounding, ukemi (safe falling and rolling), core techniques (irimi-nage, shiho-nage, kote-gaeshi, ikkyo), blending and tai sabaki (body movement), randori (multiple attacker practice), weapons awareness, and applying principles off the mat. Use when learning a defensive martial art that prioritizes de-escalation, developing the ability to redirect aggression without causing unnecessary harm, building safe falling skills, or cultivating calm centeredness under physical pressure.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

pjt222/agent-almanac422026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Analyze an arbitrary codebase to identify functions, APIs, and data sources suitable for exposure as MCP tools, producing a tool specification document. Use when planning an MCP server for an existing project, auditing a codebase before wrapping it as an AI-accessible tool surface, comparing what a codebase can do versus what is already exposed via MCP, or generating a tool spec to hand off to scaffold-mcp-server.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

pjt222/agent-almanac422026년 10월 21일 업데이트

pjt222의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고