본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

r-cran-status

Look up an R package's live status on cran.r-project.org - submission/review state (queue, human review, waiting, archived, past version's fate) or R CMD check results (OK/NOTE/WARN/ERROR per platform). Use for "what's the CRAN status of X", "did X get accepted/rejected", "is X passing CRAN checks", "when was version Y archived", "did win-builder get my package", "is win-builder processing my submission".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md9.5 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

CRAN Package Status

Check a package's submission/review state, a specific historical version's fate (e.g. {package} {version}, as in btw v1.4.0), or its current R CMD check results across CRAN's test platforms.

"CRAN status" is ambiguous between two questions:

  • Submission status: is/was this package (or version) in review, published, archived, or rejected? See "Submission Status".
  • Check results: is the published version passing R CMD check on all platforms, or does it have WARN/ERROR/NOTE flags risking removal? See "Check Results".

CRAN's servers are a shared, unpaid resource. Never issue requests in parallel or in a tight loop — pause briefly (e.g. sleep 1) between requests, stop looping as soon as a match is found, and avoid re-fetching a page you've already checked in this session.

Workflow

  1. Ask for the package name if not provided. A version may also be given (e.g. btw v1.4.0 or btw 1.4.0); strip any leading v.
  2. Decide which question is being asked:
    • Version given, or request mentions submission, review, the queue, or rejection/archival → Submission Status.
    • Request mentions checks, R CMD check, WARN/ERROR/NOTE, or platforms/flavors → Check Results.
    • Request mentions win-builder, check_win_devel(), or whether a submission arrived → Win-Builder.
    • If genuinely ambiguous (e.g. just "check the CRAN status of x"), ask which is meant, or check both and report both.
  3. Follow the relevant section below and report the result.

Submission Status

  1. Check the currently published version first (see below).
  2. If no version was requested, or it matches the current version: report it as the current, published release. Skip to step 5 unless it's absent from PACKAGES, in which case continue to step 3.
  3. If a prior check this conversation already located the package in a stage or reviewer folder, check that folder first, then forward from it in the pipeline order (see "CRAN Review Stages") — don't re-sweep from the start. Otherwise, sweep all stage and reviewer folders.
  4. Search the incoming/ stage folders (see below).
  5. Search the reviewer-assigned folders (see below).
  6. If a specific version was requested and doesn't match the current published version (or the package isn't published at all), check the CRAN Archive for that version (see below).
  7. Report the result (see "Reporting Submission Status Results").

CRAN Review Stages

Listed in typical pipeline order — a package usually moves top to bottom, though not every package passes through every stage:

  • inspect / newbies: awaiting initial manual inspection (newbies is for first-time submitters)
  • pending: awaiting closer review
  • human/<initials>: assigned to a CRAN reviewer
  • pretest: automated checks (re)running
  • waiting: CRAN is waiting for a maintainer response (loops back to pretest once the maintainer responds)
  • recheck: reverse-dependency checks
  • publish: approved and awaiting publication
  • archive: rejected

Checking Incoming Stage Folders

Replace {package} with the actual package name. Start at the last-known stage if one exists (see Submission Status step 3), else at inspect:

for stage in inspect newbies pending pretest waiting recheck publish archive; do
  curl -Ls "https://cran.r-project.org/incoming/$stage/" |
    grep -Eio '[^"]*{package}[^"]*' &&
    echo "Stage: $stage" && break
  sleep 1
done

Checking Reviewer-Assigned Folders

Reviewer-initials folders (e.g. human/KH) change as CRAN's team changes, so discover them from the incoming/ listing instead of a fixed set: any folder there that isn't one of the stage names above is a reviewer folder.

reviewer_folders=$(
  curl -Ls "https://cran.r-project.org/incoming/" |
    grep -Eio '<a href="[^"]+/">' |
    sed -E 's/<a href="([^"]+)\/">/\1/' |
    grep -Ev '^(inspect|newbies|pending|pretest|publish|recheck|archive|waiting|special)$'
)

for stage in $reviewer_folders; do
  curl -Ls "https://cran.r-project.org/incoming/$stage/" |
    grep -Eio '[^"]*{package}[^"]*' &&
    echo "Stage: human/$stage" && break
  sleep 1
done

Checking Whether the Package Is Already Published

curl -Ls https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/PACKAGES |
  awk -v pkg="{package}" '
    $0 == "Package: " pkg { found=1 }
    found && /^Version:/ { print; exit }
  '

A printed Version: line is the current CRAN version. Remember it — needed later to say whether a requested older version was "superseded by" it.

Checking a Specific Version in the CRAN Archive

Superseded versions move out of src/contrib/ into a per-package archive folder. This Archive is unrelated to the archive incoming/ stage above (that means "rejected"; this means "an older version, since superseded").

curl -Ls "https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/{package}/" |
  grep -Eio '[^"]*{package}_{version}\.tar\.gz[^"]*'

A matching .tar.gz filename means that exact version was published and has since been superseded.

Reporting Submission Status Results

  • No version requested:
    • Present in PACKAGES: report as published, with current version.
    • Else found in an incoming/ or reviewer folder: report the folder name and meaning from the stage list above.
    • Else: report it wasn't found in CRAN's submission queue or index.
  • Specific version requested:
    • Matches current version in PACKAGES: report as the current release.
    • Else found in the CRAN Archive: report it was published and has been superseded by the current version (from PACKAGES), e.g. "available in the archive, superseded by v1.5.0".
    • Else the package (any version) is found in an incoming/ or reviewer folder: report that stage, noting the requested version wasn't a past release.
    • Else: report the requested version wasn't found (current, archived, or in-review).

Check Results

CRAN publishes per-platform R CMD check results for every published package at https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_{package}.html. WARN or ERROR results persisting more than ~2-4 weeks risk archival by CRAN.

Fetch and simplify the results table:

curl -Ls "https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_{package}.html" |
  grep '<tr> <td>' |
  sed -E 's/<[^>]+>/ /g' |
  awk '{print $1": "$NF}'

Prints one flavor: STATUS line per row, e.g.:

r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang: OK
r-oldrel-windows-x86_64: ERROR

Status is OK, NOTE, WARN, or ERROR. For any non-OK flavor, full failure output is further down the same page under "Check Details" — fetch again without stripping tags and read the <pre>-formatted section after the failing flavor's Version: / Check: / Result: lines.

A 404 means no CRAN check history — likely not currently published. Check submission status instead.

Reporting Check Results

  • Every flavor OK: report the package passes checks on all platforms.
  • Any flavor NOTE/WARN/ERROR: list affected flavors and status, summarize failure reason(s) from "Check Details", and note that persistent WARN/ERROR can lead to archival.
  • Page 404s: report no check results exist; check/report submission status instead.

Win-Builder

Win-builder (win-builder.r-project.org) runs R CMD check on Windows for packages submitted via devtools::check_win_devel() (or check_win_release() / check_win_oldrelease()): the tarball is uploaded by anonymous FTP to ftp://win-builder.r-project.org/<flavor>/ (R-devel, R-release, or R-oldrelease), and results are emailed to the maintainer address in DESCRIPTION, usually within 15-30 minutes. A local success message only means the upload command finished — verify receipt on the server.

  1. Upload receipt (authoritative). The tarball should be listed in the flavor's FTP folder:

    curl ftp://win-builder.r-project.org/R-devel/
    

    Listed = uploaded and queued. Server timestamps are European time (CEST/CET) — offset them when comparing to local submission time.

  2. Progress. Once win-builder picks the file up, it appears in the pretest listing:

    curl -Ls https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ |
      grep -i {package}
    

    Entries look like {package}_{version}_{yyyymmdd}_{hhmmss} and appear only once checking starts; logs live inside each entry (e.g. 00check.log). Entries linger for months — match version and date, not just the package name.

Gotchas:

  • A missing incoming_pretest entry ≠ failed upload — entries lag behind the FTP listing, which is the authoritative arrival check; queues can jam for hours, and the listing's backlog shows it.
  • Don't advise resubmitting while the tarball is still listed — it's queued, and a duplicate won't speed it up.
  • Tarball gone but no email? The run likely finished; check the maintainer's spam folder and incoming_pretest/ for a recent entry matching the version. Nothing after several hours → ask R-package-devel rather than resubmit.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

alt-text

무료

Generate and improve accessible alt text for data visualizations and images in R packages and Quarto documents. Use when the user wants to add, improve, or audit alt text for figures in a pkgdown site or .qmd files. Activate for requests that mention fig-alt, fig.alt, figure descriptions, or alt text in the context of an R package or Quarto document.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

posit-dev/skills5432026년 10월 16일 업데이트

brand-yml

무료

Create and use brand.yml files for consistent branding across Shiny apps and Quarto documents. Covers: (1) Creating new _brand.yml files, (2) Applying to Shiny (R and Python), (3) Using in Quarto, (4) Modifying existing files, and (5) Troubleshooting. Includes complete specifications and integration guides.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

posit-dev/skills5432026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Create a release checklist and GitHub issue for an R package. Use when the user asks to "create a release checklist" or "start a release" for an R package.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

posit-dev/skills5432026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Rigorously review code or pull requests for correctness, security, accessibility, maintainability, tests, and edge cases. Use when users request a critical code review, want a guided walkthrough of findings, need implementer-facing feedback, or want to prepare, create, or submit a GitHub pull request review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

posit-dev/skills5432026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Deploy or publish Python and R content to a Posit Connect server using rsconnect-python or the R rsconnect package. Handles interactive apps and dashboards, web APIs, rendered documents, and prepared bundles/manifests. Use whenever the user asks to deploy, publish, or redeploy content to Posit Connect, or mentions rsconnect. Consult this skill instead of guessing flags or commands.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

posit-dev/skills5432026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Research a codebase and create architectural documentation describing how features or systems work. Use when the user asks to: (1) Document how a feature works, (2) Create an architecture overview, (3) Explain code structure for onboarding or knowledge transfer, (4) Research and describe a system's design. Produces markdown documents with Mermaid diagrams and stable code references suitable for humans and AI agents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

posit-dev/skills5432026년 10월 16일 업데이트

posit-dev의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고