본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

deal-qualification

Qualify a sales opportunity using the MEDDIC framework. Use when the user says "qualify this deal", "is this deal real", "MEDDIC qualification", "MEDDICC framework", "should I pursue this opportunity", "deal review", "how qualified is this prospect", "pipeline review prep", "forecast this deal", "sanity check on this opportunity", or wants to assess whether a sales opportunity is worth pursuing and at what pipeline stage.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md5.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Overview

Based on "MEDDICC" by Andy Whyte (and the original MEDDIC methodology from PTC). MEDDICC is the qualification framework used by the highest-performing enterprise sales teams globally. It maps every deal across seven dimensions: Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Criteria, Decision Process, Identify Pain, Champion, and Competition. Gaps in any dimension are gaps in your deal - not unknowns, risks.

Workflow

Step 1: Score each MEDDICC dimension

Run through every letter. For each one, write what you know and what you don't know. A blank answer is a red flag, not a neutral state.

DimensionKey question
M - MetricsWhat is the quantified business impact of solving this problem?
E - Economic BuyerWho has final budget authority? Have you spoken to them directly?
D - Decision CriteriaWhat does the prospect use to evaluate solutions? Do you know all criteria?
D - Decision ProcessWhat are the steps from now to signed contract? Who is involved at each step?
I - Identify PainWhat is the explicit, documented pain? Who feels it most acutely?
C - ChampionWho inside the account is actively selling for you when you're not in the room?
C - CompetitionWho else is being evaluated? What is your position vs. each competitor?

Step 2: Flag red zones

For each dimension scored blank or weak, mark it RED. A deal with 3+ red zones should not be in your forecast at any stage above "pipeline."

Common red zone patterns:

  • "I haven't met the Economic Buyer" = you are not in a real deal yet
  • "I don't know their evaluation criteria" = you are flying blind in a competitive situation
  • "I have a contact but no Champion" = your contact cannot close this internally without you

Step 3: Build the gap-closing plan

For every red zone, write one action to close the gap this week.

Format:

  • Gap: [dimension + what's missing]
  • Action: [specific outreach or meeting to close it]
  • Owner: [who on your team does this]
  • Deadline: [specific date]

Example:

  • Gap: Economic Buyer - never spoken to VP of Finance who owns budget
  • Action: Ask Champion to facilitate 20-min intro call with VP Finance
  • Owner: [AE name]
  • Deadline: This Friday

Step 4: Assign a deal stage based on MEDDICC completeness

StageMEDDICC requirement
PipelinePain confirmed, one internal contact
QualifiedM + E + I confirmed, Champion identified
CommitAll 7 dimensions known, Decision Process has a close date
ClosedContract signed

Do not let deals sit in Commit without all 7 dimensions covered.

Step 5: Prep the deal review narrative

Write a 5-sentence deal summary using this structure:

  1. What is the pain and who feels it? (I)
  2. What is the quantified impact of solving it? (M)
  3. Who is the Champion and what have they done to demonstrate that? (C)
  4. Who is the Economic Buyer and what is their posture? (E)
  5. What is the next step and when does it happen? (D - process)

This narrative is what you bring to pipeline review. If you can't write it, the deal is not qualified.

Anti-Patterns

1. Confusing a contact with a Champion Bad: "My Champion is [name] - she was really engaged on our last call." Good: A Champion has organizational credibility, access to the Economic Buyer, and has taken a personal risk for you (e.g., introduced you upward, shared internal budget info, advocated in a meeting you weren't in).

2. Accepting verbal budget confirmation as Economic Buyer access Bad: "They said budget isn't an issue." Good: "I have met the Economic Buyer, confirmed the budget line, and know who needs to sign the PO."

3. Leaving competition as "unknown" Bad: "We don't know who else they're evaluating." Good: Ask directly - "Are you evaluating other solutions alongside us?" Then position against each competitor.

4. Moving a deal to Commit on gut feel Bad: "They seem really interested, I'm 90% confident." Good: Every MEDDICC dimension is documented. The Decision Process has a signed-off timeline with specific dates.

Quality Checklist

  • All 7 MEDDICC dimensions answered - no blanks
  • Red zones identified and a gap-closing action written for each
  • Champion has demonstrated internal advocacy, not just enthusiasm
  • Economic Buyer has been spoken to directly, not just named
  • Metrics are quantified in the prospect's own terms (time, money, or risk)
  • Decision Process has a specific close date agreed upon with the prospect
  • Deal stage matches MEDDICC completeness, not the sales rep's optimism

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Rate any product, feature, or experience on the 11-star scale (Brian Chesky's Airbnb thought experiment). Use when user says "rate this experience", "11-star", "star rating", "experience audit", "how good is this", "experience rating", "product audit", "quality assessment", or wants to evaluate product quality and identify improvement paths. Also trigger when user wants to benchmark a feature, assess where a product stands, or map out what "great" looks like - even if they don't explicitly say "11-star".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Generate A/B copy variants grounded in Eugene Schwartz's awareness and market-sophistication stages and John Caples' tested-headline discipline. Every variant declares its angle, the awareness stage it targets, and a falsifiable hypothesis, and the skill recommends which pair to test first and what delta counts as signal. Use when the user says "A/B test this", "write variants", "give me options", "test different angles", "copy variants", "ab copy", "test this headline", "multiple versions", "which version is better", or wants to test copy before publishing. For reviewing copy that already exists, see copy-review. For sample size and stopping rules, see growth-experiment. For diagnosing a page rather than its words, see page-cro. For full paid ad sets by platform, see ad-campaign-writer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Design statistically rigorous experiments to test data science hypotheses. Use when the user says "design an A/B test", "run an experiment", "test this hypothesis", "is this difference significant", "how many samples do I need", "randomized controlled trial", "causal inference", "uplift test", "holdout group", "significance test", "power calculation", "avoid p-hacking", or needs to determine whether an observed effect is real before making a product or model decision. For lean build-measure-learn product experiments without the statistics, use experiment-design instead.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Write measurable acceptance criteria for requirements or user stories. Use when the user says "write acceptance criteria", "definition of done", "how do we test this", "fit criteria", "given when then", "Gherkin scenarios", "what does done look like", "testable conditions", "how will we know this works" - even if they don't explicitly say "acceptance criteria".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Build a strategic account plan for winning, retaining, or expanding a named account. Use when the user says "build an account plan", "strategic account planning", "how do I grow this account", "account expansion strategy", "whitespace analysis", "QBR prep", "key account review", "map the stakeholders in this account", "land and expand plan", "how do I break into [company]", or wants a structured strategy for a specific account.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Write paid ad copy for LinkedIn, Google, Meta, and YouTube. Produces multiple variants per platform, each targeting a different Eugene Schwartz awareness level and Cialdini persuasion principle. Use when the user asks for ad copy, ad variants, "write LinkedIn ads", Google ads, Meta ads, paid social copy, ad headlines, or wants creative for a paid campaign. Reads brand voice, ICP, and positioning from knowledge/. For organic social posts, see linkedin-post or social-calendar. For the landing page the ad points at, see landing-page-writer. For testing variants, see ab-copy-writer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

qa-aman의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고