본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

discovery-call

Structure and prepare for a sales discovery call. Use when the user says "prep for discovery call", "discovery call questions", "how to structure my discovery call", "first call with a prospect", "what to ask on a discovery call", "sales call prep", "plan my discovery call", "initial call framework", or wants to prepare for or debrief a first sales conversation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md5.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Overview

Based on "SPIN Selling" by Neil Rackham. Rackham's 12-year, 35,000-call research study found that top performers don't pitch - they ask questions in a specific sequence that leads prospects to articulate their own pain and desired outcomes. The SPIN framework (Situation, Problem, Implication, Need-Payoff) structures discovery to surface explicit needs before any solution discussion.

Workflow

Step 1: Set call objectives before dialing

Define three things before the call starts:

  • Minimum outcome: the one thing you must leave with (e.g., a confirmed pain point, a next meeting)
  • Ideal outcome: what a perfect call ends with (e.g., confirmed budget, sponsor identified, demo scheduled)
  • Opening statement: one sentence on why this call is worth their 30 minutes

Write these down. Do not improvise the opening.

Step 2: Run Situation questions - establish context (5-8 min)

Gather facts about the prospect's current state. Keep this section short - prospects find these questions low-value. Limit to 3-4 questions.

Examples:

  • "How does your team currently handle [relevant process]?"
  • "How many people are involved in [relevant workflow]?"
  • "What tools are you using today for [relevant area]?"

Do not ask questions whose answers are on their website or LinkedIn. That signals you didn't prepare.

Step 3: Run Problem questions - surface dissatisfaction (8-12 min)

Shift to asking about difficulties, frustrations, and gaps. This is where top performers spend the most time.

Examples:

  • "Where does that process break down for you?"
  • "What's the biggest friction point when [relevant scenario] happens?"
  • "How often does that cause issues downstream?"
  • "What happens when it doesn't work the way you need it to?"

Listen for language that signals explicit pain. Write it down verbatim - you'll use their words back in your proposal.

Step 4: Run Implication questions - expand the problem (5-8 min)

Make the prospect feel the cost of inaction. Connect the problem to business impact: revenue lost, time wasted, team morale, customer churn, competitive risk.

Examples:

  • "When that breaks down, what's the downstream effect on [team/metric/customer]?"
  • "How much time does your team spend working around that?"
  • "What does that mean for your [quarterly target / renewal rate / customer satisfaction]?"
  • "If this isn't solved in the next six months, what happens?"

You are not inventing urgency - you are helping them calculate the cost of the status quo.

Step 5: Run Need-Payoff questions - let them sell themselves (5 min)

Ask questions that get the prospect to articulate the value of solving the problem. Do not pitch. Let them describe the benefit.

Examples:

  • "If you could eliminate that friction, what would that unlock for your team?"
  • "How valuable would it be to get that time back?"
  • "What would it mean for your roadmap if this was no longer a bottleneck?"

The prospect describing the solution in their own words is worth more than any demo slide.

Step 6: Confirm, summarize, and advance

Before ending the call:

  1. Summarize what you heard: "So the core issue is [X], and if left unaddressed it impacts [Y]. Is that right?"
  2. Confirm explicit interest: "Does solving this feel like a priority right now?"
  3. Propose a specific next step with a date: "I'd like to put together a recommendation and walk through it with your team on [date]. Does that work?"

Never leave a call with "I'll follow up." Leave with a confirmed next step.

Anti-Patterns

1. Pitching too early Bad: "Great, sounds like you have [problem] - we actually solve that. Let me show you how..." Good: Ask an Implication question to expand the problem before saying anything about your product.

2. Asking Situation questions you could have researched Bad: "How many employees does your company have?" Good: "Your team grew 40% last year - how has that affected your [relevant process]?"

3. Treating a surface-level pain as a green light Bad: Moving to demo scheduling the moment a prospect says "yeah, that's a challenge for us." Good: Follow up with an Implication question to understand scope and severity before advancing.

4. Vague next steps Bad: "I'll send over some materials and we can reconnect." Good: "Can we put 45 minutes on the calendar for Thursday at 2pm? I'll bring [specific deliverable]."

Quality Checklist

  • Wrote down minimum outcome and ideal outcome before the call
  • Asked fewer than 5 Situation questions - did not over-research on the call
  • Asked at least 2 Implication questions that tied the problem to business impact
  • Asked at least 1 Need-Payoff question and let the prospect answer fully
  • Captured the prospect's exact words for their pain and desired outcome
  • Left the call with a specific next step confirmed (not "I'll follow up")
  • Did not pitch the product before the prospect articulated an explicit need

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Rate any product, feature, or experience on the 11-star scale (Brian Chesky's Airbnb thought experiment). Use when user says "rate this experience", "11-star", "star rating", "experience audit", "how good is this", "experience rating", "product audit", "quality assessment", or wants to evaluate product quality and identify improvement paths. Also trigger when user wants to benchmark a feature, assess where a product stands, or map out what "great" looks like - even if they don't explicitly say "11-star".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Generate A/B copy variants grounded in Eugene Schwartz's awareness and market-sophistication stages and John Caples' tested-headline discipline. Every variant declares its angle, the awareness stage it targets, and a falsifiable hypothesis, and the skill recommends which pair to test first and what delta counts as signal. Use when the user says "A/B test this", "write variants", "give me options", "test different angles", "copy variants", "ab copy", "test this headline", "multiple versions", "which version is better", or wants to test copy before publishing. For reviewing copy that already exists, see copy-review. For sample size and stopping rules, see growth-experiment. For diagnosing a page rather than its words, see page-cro. For full paid ad sets by platform, see ad-campaign-writer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Design statistically rigorous experiments to test data science hypotheses. Use when the user says "design an A/B test", "run an experiment", "test this hypothesis", "is this difference significant", "how many samples do I need", "randomized controlled trial", "causal inference", "uplift test", "holdout group", "significance test", "power calculation", "avoid p-hacking", or needs to determine whether an observed effect is real before making a product or model decision. For lean build-measure-learn product experiments without the statistics, use experiment-design instead.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Write measurable acceptance criteria for requirements or user stories. Use when the user says "write acceptance criteria", "definition of done", "how do we test this", "fit criteria", "given when then", "Gherkin scenarios", "what does done look like", "testable conditions", "how will we know this works" - even if they don't explicitly say "acceptance criteria".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Build a strategic account plan for winning, retaining, or expanding a named account. Use when the user says "build an account plan", "strategic account planning", "how do I grow this account", "account expansion strategy", "whitespace analysis", "QBR prep", "key account review", "map the stakeholders in this account", "land and expand plan", "how do I break into [company]", or wants a structured strategy for a specific account.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Write paid ad copy for LinkedIn, Google, Meta, and YouTube. Produces multiple variants per platform, each targeting a different Eugene Schwartz awareness level and Cialdini persuasion principle. Use when the user asks for ad copy, ad variants, "write LinkedIn ads", Google ads, Meta ads, paid social copy, ad headlines, or wants creative for a paid campaign. Reads brand voice, ICP, and positioning from knowledge/. For organic social posts, see linkedin-post or social-calendar. For the landing page the ad points at, see landing-page-writer. For testing variants, see ab-copy-writer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

qa-aman의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고