본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

expansion-discovery

Identify expansion signals and structure upsell or cross-sell conversations using land-and-expand and Net Revenue Retention principles. Use when user says "upsell", "expansion", "cross-sell", "grow the account", "increase ARR", "find expansion opportunities", "NRR improvement", "upgrade conversation", "add-on", "renewal and expand", or "land and expand" - even if they don't say "expansion discovery" explicitly. Applies to CSMs managing account growth or CS teams building expansion playbooks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md8.2 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Overview

Based on "Farm Don't Hunt" by Guy Nirpaz and "The Customer Success Economy" by Mehta & Steinman, expansion is not a sales motion - it is a CS motion. Customers expand when they have achieved value in the current footprint and have a clear problem that an expanded product solves. Pushing expansion before value is established destroys trust. Waiting too long leaves revenue on the table.

The core insight: Net Revenue Retention (NRR) is the most important SaaS metric. An NRR above 110% means expansion is compounding growth - even with some churn, you're growing. A CSM who surfaces and advances expansion opportunities is directly contributing to company revenue.

Workflow

Step 1: Confirm readiness for an expansion conversation

Expansion should only be pursued when the current footprint is healthy. Check all three:

  • Health score is Green or Yellow-trending-Green
  • Customer has achieved at least one measurable outcome tied to their original goal
  • Champion is active and engaged (not gone dark, not at risk of leaving)

If any of these are false, fix the current footprint first. An expansion push on a shaky foundation accelerates churn, it doesn't prevent it.

Step 2: Identify expansion signals from usage and conversation data

Usage signals (pull from your product analytics):

  • Seats approaching the contracted limit (>80% of licensed seats active)
  • Power users creating workarounds for functionality in a higher tier
  • High adoption of features that have a premium-tier equivalent
  • Multiple departments using the product independently without a coordinated license

Relationship signals (look for these in call notes and emails):

  • Customer mentions a related problem they're solving with a different tool
  • Champion asks about a feature that exists in a higher tier
  • Customer references headcount growth, new teams, or org expansion
  • Customer asks how other companies in their space use the product
  • Executive mentions a new strategic initiative the product could support

Conversation signals (direct indicators of expansion readiness):

  • "We wish we could do X" - X exists in a higher tier or add-on
  • "We're using [competitor tool] for Y" - Y is something you can replace
  • "Our [other team] has been asking about this" - new department opportunity
  • "We're going to need more seats soon" - volume expansion signal

Document which signals are present for [customer name].

Step 3: Map signals to expansion type

SignalExpansion TypeConversation Approach
Approaching seat limitVolume expansionProactive - bring data, frame as planning ahead
Using competitor for adjacent use caseCross-sell / consolidationProblem-led - quantify the cost of fragmentation
New team or department interestedNew use case expansionReference-led - show how current team's results can replicate
Power users hitting tier limitsTier upgradeValue-led - show the ROI gap between tiers
New strategic initiativeNew use caseExecutive-led - align to the initiative, not the feature

Step 4: Prepare the expansion conversation

Do not bring a pricing sheet to an expansion conversation. Bring value data and a problem framing.

Structure for the expansion conversation:

  1. Recap current value: "Since you started with us, [specific outcome with data]. Your team is doing [specific usage behavior]."

  2. Bridge to the observed signal: "I noticed [specific signal]. I wanted to ask you about it directly."

  3. Explore the problem (use open questions):

    • "Tell me more about how you're handling [adjacent problem] today."
    • "What does that cost you in time / money / risk?"
    • "If you could solve that, what would it change for the team?"
  4. Connect to your solution (only after the problem is articulated): "Based on what you've described, [specific feature or tier] is designed exactly for this. Customers in similar situations used it to [specific outcome]."

  5. Next step, not a close: "I'd like to put together a proposal that shows the ROI. Can we get 30 minutes with [economic buyer] to walk through it?"

Never close expansion in the discovery call. The goal of this conversation is to earn a proposal meeting, not to get a verbal commit.

Step 5: Build the expansion brief for internal alignment

Before advancing the opportunity, align internally with sales (if separate) and your manager.

[Customer name] - Expansion Brief

Account ARR: [current ARR] Potential expansion ARR: [estimated value] Expansion type: Volume / Tier upgrade / Cross-sell / New department Signal(s) identified: [list] Customer contact: [champion name and title - no personal last names in template] Economic buyer: [who controls budget] Discovery call date: [date] Problem confirmed by customer: [1-2 sentence summary in customer's words] Proposed solution: [specific product tier, add-on, or seat increase] Comparable customer reference: [similar customer who expanded and got X outcome] Next step: [specific meeting or proposal with date]

Step 6: Calculate and present the expansion ROI

Expansion conversations stall when the customer cannot justify the incremental cost internally. Build the ROI case before the proposal meeting.

Framework:

  • Current value: [quantified outcome from existing footprint]
  • Expansion cost: [delta between current and proposed contract]
  • Expected incremental outcome: [specific measurable result from the expansion]
  • Payback period: [months to recover the incremental investment]

Example: "Your current investment is $X/year. Adding [module] is $Y/year incremental. Based on how similar customers have used it, you would expect [outcome] within [timeframe], which pays back the incremental cost in [N] months."

Anti-Patterns

1. Expansion before value established Bad: Pitching an upsell at month 2 of onboarding before the customer has hit their first milestone. Good: Wait for a measurable outcome. Expansion is earned, not scheduled.

2. Price-led conversations Bad: "We have a special pricing offer on our enterprise tier this quarter." Good: "You mentioned you're handling [problem] with a separate tool. I want to show you what it would look like to consolidate."

3. Surprise the customer with a proposal Bad: Sending a contract expansion proposal without a prior discovery conversation. Good: Discovery call first, always. The proposal follows confirmed problem understanding.

4. Expanding the wrong contact Bad: Running the expansion conversation with the champion but skipping the economic buyer. Good: Map the economic buyer early. The champion needs to be able to get budget approval. If they can't, get to the person who can before investing in the proposal.

5. Treating expansion as a sales handoff Bad: "This is a growth opportunity, I'll loop in sales." Good: CSM drives expansion discovery. Sales may assist on negotiation and legal. The relationship and the value case belong to CS.

Quality Checklist

  • Current footprint health confirmed (Green or trending Green) before starting
  • Specific signals documented - not "feels ready," but named indicators
  • Expansion type identified (volume, tier, cross-sell, new department)
  • Discovery conversation structured around problem-first, not product-first
  • Economic buyer identified - not just champion
  • Expansion brief prepared with ARR estimate and comparable reference customer
  • ROI case built before proposal meeting
  • Next step is a meeting with economic buyer, not a verbal close in discovery
  • No personal names, internal tool names, or company-specific references in template

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Rate any product, feature, or experience on the 11-star scale (Brian Chesky's Airbnb thought experiment). Use when user says "rate this experience", "11-star", "star rating", "experience audit", "how good is this", "experience rating", "product audit", "quality assessment", or wants to evaluate product quality and identify improvement paths. Also trigger when user wants to benchmark a feature, assess where a product stands, or map out what "great" looks like - even if they don't explicitly say "11-star".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Generate A/B copy variants grounded in Eugene Schwartz's awareness and market-sophistication stages and John Caples' tested-headline discipline. Every variant declares its angle, the awareness stage it targets, and a falsifiable hypothesis, and the skill recommends which pair to test first and what delta counts as signal. Use when the user says "A/B test this", "write variants", "give me options", "test different angles", "copy variants", "ab copy", "test this headline", "multiple versions", "which version is better", or wants to test copy before publishing. For reviewing copy that already exists, see copy-review. For sample size and stopping rules, see growth-experiment. For diagnosing a page rather than its words, see page-cro. For full paid ad sets by platform, see ad-campaign-writer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Design statistically rigorous experiments to test data science hypotheses. Use when the user says "design an A/B test", "run an experiment", "test this hypothesis", "is this difference significant", "how many samples do I need", "randomized controlled trial", "causal inference", "uplift test", "holdout group", "significance test", "power calculation", "avoid p-hacking", or needs to determine whether an observed effect is real before making a product or model decision. For lean build-measure-learn product experiments without the statistics, use experiment-design instead.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Write measurable acceptance criteria for requirements or user stories. Use when the user says "write acceptance criteria", "definition of done", "how do we test this", "fit criteria", "given when then", "Gherkin scenarios", "what does done look like", "testable conditions", "how will we know this works" - even if they don't explicitly say "acceptance criteria".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Build a strategic account plan for winning, retaining, or expanding a named account. Use when the user says "build an account plan", "strategic account planning", "how do I grow this account", "account expansion strategy", "whitespace analysis", "QBR prep", "key account review", "map the stakeholders in this account", "land and expand plan", "how do I break into [company]", or wants a structured strategy for a specific account.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Write paid ad copy for LinkedIn, Google, Meta, and YouTube. Produces multiple variants per platform, each targeting a different Eugene Schwartz awareness level and Cialdini persuasion principle. Use when the user asks for ad copy, ad variants, "write LinkedIn ads", Google ads, Meta ads, paid social copy, ad headlines, or wants creative for a paid campaign. Reads brand voice, ICP, and positioning from knowledge/. For organic social posts, see linkedin-post or social-calendar. For the landing page the ad points at, see landing-page-writer. For testing variants, see ab-copy-writer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

qa-aman의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고