본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

financial-statement-review

Analyze and interpret financial statements to surface performance signals, quality concerns, and red flags. Use when an accountant says "review these financials", "analyze the income statement", "look at the balance sheet", "what does the cash flow statement tell us", "check the financial health", "ratio analysis", "are the earnings real", "working capital review", "does this company have liquidity issues", or needs to interpret any of the three core financial statements - even if they don't explicitly say "financial statement review". Also trigger when someone shares P&L, balance sheet, or cash flow data and asks what it means.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md7.3 KB
  • references/industry-benchmarks.md6.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Reference Files

  • references/industry-benchmarks.md - Ratio benchmarks by industry (SaaS, manufacturing, retail, professional services, healthcare). Read this in Step 4 when calculating ratios and when you need industry-specific thresholds to compare against.

Overview

Based on "Financial Intelligence" by Karen Berman & Joe Knight and "The Interpretation of Financial Statements" by Benjamin Graham. Financial statements are not just numbers - they are a compressed story of business decisions. The goal of a review is not to recite figures but to answer three questions: Is this business profitable in a way that will last? Is it financially stable? Is the reported profit converting to real cash?

Graham's core principle: always read all three statements together. The income statement shows profit; the balance sheet shows what was built with it; the cash flow statement shows whether the profit is real.

Workflow

Step 1: Read the Income Statement for quality of earnings

Start with the income statement and look beyond the headline net income number.

Revenue: [amount] - Is it growing? At what rate? Is growth organic or acquisition-driven?
Gross Margin: [%] - Is it stable, expanding, or compressing? Why?
Operating Income (EBIT): [amount] - Is operating leverage positive (margins growing faster than revenue)?
Net Income: [amount] - What is the effective tax rate? Are one-time items inflating it?

Flag immediately:

  • Revenue growing but gross margin compressing (pricing power loss or cost problem)
  • Net income higher than operating income (non-operating gains masking operations)
  • Large "other income" or restructuring charges that recur every year (not truly one-time)

Step 2: Read the Balance Sheet for financial stability

Assess the quality and composition of assets, and whether the capital structure is sustainable.

Current Ratio: Current Assets / Current Liabilities - below 1.0 is a liquidity warning
Quick Ratio: (Cash + AR) / Current Liabilities - strips out inventory; below 0.8 is a stress signal
Debt-to-Equity: Total Debt / Total Equity - above 2.0 warrants scrutiny in most industries
AR Days (DSO): (AR / Revenue) x 365 - rising DSO means slower collections or revenue recognition issues
Inventory Days: (Inventory / COGS) x 365 - rising inventory days can signal demand weakness
Goodwill as % of Total Assets - high goodwill (>30%) reflects acquisition risk

Look for the balance sheet to tell a different story than the income statement. If AR is growing much faster than revenue, earnings quality is declining - customers are not paying.

Step 3: Read the Cash Flow Statement to verify earnings quality

The cash flow statement is where accounting choices cannot hide. Real businesses convert profit to cash.

Operating Cash Flow (OCF): [amount]
Net Income: [amount]
OCF / Net Income ratio: [calculate] - below 0.8 consistently is a red flag
Capital Expenditures: [amount] - how much is maintenance vs. growth capex?
Free Cash Flow: OCF - Capex = [amount] - the real measure of financial health

Key patterns to flag:

  • Net income positive but OCF negative (profit not converting to cash)
  • Large swings in working capital driving OCF (AR, inventory, AP changes)
  • Capex declining while depreciation rises (underinvestment in the business)

Step 4: Calculate the core ratio set

Run these ratios and compare against prior periods and industry benchmarks:

Profitability

  • Gross margin %: Gross Profit / Revenue
  • EBITDA margin %: EBITDA / Revenue
  • Return on Assets (ROA): Net Income / Total Assets
  • Return on Equity (ROE): Net Income / Total Equity

Liquidity

  • Current ratio, Quick ratio (calculated in Step 2)
  • Cash conversion cycle: DSO + Inventory Days - AP Days

Leverage

  • Debt-to-EBITDA: Total Debt / EBITDA (above 4x is high leverage)
  • Interest coverage: EBIT / Interest Expense (below 2x is distress territory)

Efficiency

  • Asset turnover: Revenue / Total Assets
  • Revenue per employee (if headcount is available)

Step 5: Write the findings summary

Structure the output as a short, opinionated memo - not a list of numbers:

FINANCIAL REVIEW: [Company / Period]

HEADLINE: [One sentence on overall financial health]

STRENGTHS
- [Specific strength with supporting metric]
- [Specific strength with supporting metric]

CONCERNS
- [Specific concern, what it means, what to watch]
- [Specific concern, what it means, what to watch]

EARNINGS QUALITY
OCF/Net Income: [ratio] - [interpretation]
[1-2 sentence verdict on whether reported earnings are backed by cash]

KEY RATIOS SUMMARY
[table of 6-8 ratios with current period vs. prior period vs. benchmark]

RECOMMENDED NEXT STEPS
- [Specific action or investigation]
- [Specific action or investigation]

Anti-Patterns

1. Reporting numbers without interpretation Bad: "Revenue was $10M, up from $8M last year." Good: "Revenue grew 25% but gross margin compressed from 42% to 37%, suggesting the growth was bought through pricing concessions or higher input costs - not through operating leverage."

2. Treating net income as the primary signal Bad: Leading with "the company is profitable" because net income is positive. Good: Cross-check OCF against net income. Positive net income with negative OCF means profit is not converting to cash - a red flag for earnings manipulation or structural problems.

3. Looking at ratios without trend or benchmark Bad: "The current ratio is 1.4." Good: "The current ratio is 1.4, down from 2.1 two years ago and below the industry median of 1.8. Liquidity is deteriorating."

4. Missing the cash flow statement Bad: Reviewing only the income statement and balance sheet. Good: The cash flow statement is the most manipulation-resistant of the three. Always read it last to validate what the other two are saying.

5. Ignoring footnotes Bad: Treating the face of the statements as complete. Good: Revenue recognition policy, lease commitments, contingent liabilities, and related-party transactions live in the footnotes. Material issues are often disclosed there and nowhere else.

Quality Checklist

  • All three statements reviewed (income statement, balance sheet, cash flow)
  • Earnings quality checked: OCF vs. net income ratio calculated
  • DSO and inventory days calculated and trended
  • At least one liquidity ratio and one leverage ratio computed
  • Findings framed as interpretation, not raw numbers
  • Red flags called out explicitly with supporting evidence
  • Summary memo written in plain language a non-accountant can act on
  • Prior period comparison included (at minimum one prior period)
  • No placeholder ratios - every ratio has a calculated value or is flagged as unavailable

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Rate any product, feature, or experience on the 11-star scale (Brian Chesky's Airbnb thought experiment). Use when user says "rate this experience", "11-star", "star rating", "experience audit", "how good is this", "experience rating", "product audit", "quality assessment", or wants to evaluate product quality and identify improvement paths. Also trigger when user wants to benchmark a feature, assess where a product stands, or map out what "great" looks like - even if they don't explicitly say "11-star".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Generate A/B copy variants grounded in Eugene Schwartz's awareness and market-sophistication stages and John Caples' tested-headline discipline. Every variant declares its angle, the awareness stage it targets, and a falsifiable hypothesis, and the skill recommends which pair to test first and what delta counts as signal. Use when the user says "A/B test this", "write variants", "give me options", "test different angles", "copy variants", "ab copy", "test this headline", "multiple versions", "which version is better", or wants to test copy before publishing. For reviewing copy that already exists, see copy-review. For sample size and stopping rules, see growth-experiment. For diagnosing a page rather than its words, see page-cro. For full paid ad sets by platform, see ad-campaign-writer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Design statistically rigorous experiments to test data science hypotheses. Use when the user says "design an A/B test", "run an experiment", "test this hypothesis", "is this difference significant", "how many samples do I need", "randomized controlled trial", "causal inference", "uplift test", "holdout group", "significance test", "power calculation", "avoid p-hacking", or needs to determine whether an observed effect is real before making a product or model decision. For lean build-measure-learn product experiments without the statistics, use experiment-design instead.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Write measurable acceptance criteria for requirements or user stories. Use when the user says "write acceptance criteria", "definition of done", "how do we test this", "fit criteria", "given when then", "Gherkin scenarios", "what does done look like", "testable conditions", "how will we know this works" - even if they don't explicitly say "acceptance criteria".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Build a strategic account plan for winning, retaining, or expanding a named account. Use when the user says "build an account plan", "strategic account planning", "how do I grow this account", "account expansion strategy", "whitespace analysis", "QBR prep", "key account review", "map the stakeholders in this account", "land and expand plan", "how do I break into [company]", or wants a structured strategy for a specific account.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Write paid ad copy for LinkedIn, Google, Meta, and YouTube. Produces multiple variants per platform, each targeting a different Eugene Schwartz awareness level and Cialdini persuasion principle. Use when the user asks for ad copy, ad variants, "write LinkedIn ads", Google ads, Meta ads, paid social copy, ad headlines, or wants creative for a paid campaign. Reads brand voice, ICP, and positioning from knowledge/. For organic social posts, see linkedin-post or social-calendar. For the landing page the ad points at, see landing-page-writer. For testing variants, see ab-copy-writer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

qa-aman/claude-skills212026년 10월 19일 업데이트

qa-aman의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고