Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
360 feedback register: reviewer, subject, review cycle, visibility, due date and score, as CSV, SQL, JSON Schema or Notion on request. Use for 360 reviews or peer feedback cycles.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
What it is: Records one feedback response per row, with the field list built only from what the user confirms.
Works out the smallest useful 360° feedback setup for the business in front of it, then builds it only when asked. The default output is a short recommendation, not a spreadsheet. CSV, SQL DDL, JSON Schema and the Notion mapping are derived from the one Field Reference below, so they cannot drift apart.
Three conceptual models are kept separate, because merging them is what forces fields to be invented:
Artifacts are empty templates by default. The single illustrative row is a shape placeholder
carrying Example / -EXAMPLE- values, never business data.
Layer: Layer 4: Manage. Fits: Growth stage. Table code: n/a.
Also use it when the user says "holistic feedback", or describes the same process happening in a spreadsheet, a document or someone's inbox.
Not for payroll, tax, legal, or employment-decision work. This skill does not automate those.
Follow the shared execution contract. The module-specific rules below define only domain fields, decisions, calculations, and safety constraints.
The rules below stand on their own. If the upstream shared execution contract (not bundled here) is unavailable, follow this file directly; a missing reference never blocks basic execution.
Read the request and pick one intent before asking anything. This is the canonical set, used here and in the context block with the same spelling:
| Intent | Trigger | Go to |
|---|---|---|
advice | "how do I ...", "what should we" | Answer, offer the build only if it helps |
review | "is this right", "review", "audit" | Check what they share |
build | "set up", "build", "create" | Step 2 |
convert | "move it from our sheet/forms" | Capture their process, then Step 2 |
export | "give me the CSV / SQL / JSON / Notion" for confirmed rules | Step 5 |
Prefer one concise question for a material ambiguity; bundle related missing facts when the user prefers it. Never ask a question whose answer would not change the recommendation or the requested artifact.
Decline only the specific high-risk action that is out of scope, and continue with the rest of the request. Example: for a request that mixes feedback capture with payroll, decline the payroll calculation and proceed with the feedback setup.
Skip anything already answered in any earlier message. Ask the rest one at a time, and stop as soon as the remaining answers would not change the output.
Decide fields from the answers, not from habit. The only fields that need no confirmation are the ones in the minimum core below. Each optional field needs a confirmed requirement behind it:
| Candidate field | Only add when the user confirms |
|---|---|
Score | A scoring mode on a defined scale |
| Additional score fields | Named competency areas, one per confirmed area |
Due Date | Deadlines are part of their process |
Reviewer | Responses are identified or confidential, not anonymous |
Review Cycle | Feedback runs in more than one cycle |
Submitted Date | Submission is timestamped in their process |
Question ID | The question set changes between cycles |
Feedback Subject | A subject is recorded at all |
Feedback Subject stays a generic label. The subject may be a person, a project, a customer or
a team, so take the type from the user rather than assuming an employee.
Never invent an answer. Record it as unknown and carry on. Unknown is a real value meaning not
yet supplied. Never turn Unknown into zero, and never turn a blank into a zero. Never re-ask an
unknown already recorded.
Answers like yes, no, maybe, same, okay or fine are not an answer to a
multiple-choice question. Re-ask as an explicit choice:
Q: Which do you mean: identified or anonymous feedback?
A: maybe
Keep only the answered part of a partial answer, and leave the rest Unknown.
Hold the answers in this shape. It stays internal, is not shown unless asked, and never carries a value the user did not give.
module: 360-feedback-system
intent: null # advice | review | build | convert | export
scale: null # only when the answer changes the recommendation
areas:
"Subject": null
"Relations
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Automate 2chat tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Usar al iniciar o mejorar un proyecto de IA: diagnostica código y restricciones, propone skills existentes y redacta tareas y un plan de implementación en español.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Usar para crear o mejorar una skill de Andru.ia: define entradas y resultados, redacta SKILL.md con ejemplos y límites, valida la estructura y prepara una PR.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Usar tras definir el sector de un proyecto: prepara un dossier en español con contexto, normas aplicables, patrones UX y riesgos, distinguiendo fuentes verificadas de hipótesis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AI-powered presentation generation via the 2slides API — create slides from text, match a reference image style, summarize documents into decks, add AI voice narration, and export pages/audio. Use f
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.