본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

idea-validation

Help users de-risk new product bets by testing core assumptions, building low-fidelity prototypes, and gathering high-signal evidence before investing heavy engineering resources.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(3)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB
  • references/artifacts.md43.3 KB
  • references/guest-insights.md34.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Idea Validation

Stop building things people don't want by moving from opinion to evidence-based development.

Help the user with idea validation using insights from 31 guests and posts across Lenny's Podcast and Newsletter.

How to Help

  1. Clarify the Core Hypothesis - Help the user define the specific problem, target audience, and the most 'risky' assumptions using the Founding Hypothesis Scorecard.
  2. Select a Validation Path - Guide the user through choosing between the 'Listening Path', 'Manual Path', or 'Self-Serve Path' based on their proximity to the problem.
  3. Design Low-Fidelity Experiments - Recommend specific 'Wizard of Oz' or 'Fake Door' tests to simulate the solution without building a backend.
  4. Evaluate Signal Quality - Help users distinguish between polite interest and real market pull by looking for financial commitment or high-effort usage.

Core Principles

First-Principles De-risking

Bangaly Kaba: "Someone says, 'Hey, you know what? This would be great to build.' And you go pull data to go justify why that would be great to build. Call that identify, justify, execute. First you have to really understand from first principles what is actually going on."

True de-risking starts with understanding the core problem from first principles before looking for data to justify a specific solution.

Maintaining Prototype Momentum

Grant Lee: "We would have an idea in the morning, come up with some sort of functional prototype, recruit a bunch of people that are legitimately good prospective users, but have zero skin in the game, ship fast so people can start playing with it. In the afternoon, we're already running pretty full scale experiment."

Build functional prototypes within hours of conceiving an idea to maintain speed and identify usability flaws before wasting development cycles.

Direct User Feedback Loops

Gustaf Alstromer: "If I drill down what makes companies fail, it's quite simple. It's just like they don't talk to users, which means they don't find product market fit. And if they don't find product market fit, nothing else really matters."

Achieve product-market fit by talking to customers directly and immediately to learn if you are building something people actually want.

Workflow Compression

Oji Udezue: "So the zone of benefit works as a framework because people will not pay for things that don't either really shrink the workflow that they're doing or doesn't give them superpower. So the same amount of time, but twice as much output. But the most important thing is that it has to be noticeable."

A problem is only worth building for if your solution offers a visible and massive compression of the existing customer workflow.

Templates & Frameworks

  • Four B2B Idea Validation Paths (How to validate your B2B startup idea) - A framework for choosing which validation strategy to use based on your context as a founder. Each path represents a different level of up-front investment and
  • B2B Idea Validation Interview Process (How to validate your B2B startup idea) - A synthesized process for conducting validation interviews based on patterns across multiple successful B2B founders
  • Four Signs Your B2B Idea Has Real Pull (How to validate your B2B startup idea) - A checklist of signals that indicate genuine market demand vs. polite but hollow interest
  • Vanta's Manual Validation Process (How to validate your B2B startup idea) - How Christina Cacioppo validated Vanta's idea by manually creating SOC 2 compliance reports before writing any code
  • Founding Hypothesis Scorecard (Introducing the Foundation Sprint: From the creators of the Design Sprint) - A scorecard with testable questions for each element of the Founding Hypothesis, used to systematically validate or invalidate your product strategy
  • Pre-Product Invoice Test (How to know if you've got product-market fit) - A pre-product PMF validation technique where you literally try to get potential customers to pay you before the product exists.
  • Ugly Baby Validation (1,000,000) - A framework for getting early validation on a new creative project by finding the right motivators
  • DoorDash's paloaltodelivery.com MVP (How the biggest consumer apps got their first 1,000 users) - How DoorDash validated demand with a simple website with PDF menus and printed flyers at Stanford

See references/artifacts.md for the full list with details.

Questions to Help Users

  • "What is the single most risky assumption that must be true for this idea to succeed?"
  • "Are you getting feedback from cold prospects or just people in your network who want to be nice?"
  • "How many steps does your solution remove from the user's current manual workflow?"
  • "If you had to launch a 'fake door' experiment tomorrow with zero backend, what would it look like?"
  • "Has a potential customer offered to pay for this before you have even built it?"
  • "What is the 'must-have' feature that, if missing, would cause the user to walk away immediately?"

Common Mistakes to Flag

  • Confusing Politeness with Validation - Mistaking 'this looks cool' for 'I will pay for this' leads to building products that lack real market pull.
  • Building Before Testing - Investing heavy engineering resources into a full backend before validating the front-end value proposition wastes months of time.
  • Relying on Warm Leads - Feedback from friends or family is biased and rarely provides the 'pure' signal needed to judge an idea's merit.
  • Averaging User Feedback - Failing to segment feedback between skeptics and early adopters can lead to a watered-down product that serves nobody well.

Deep Dive

For all 33 sourced insights from 31 guests, see references/guest-insights.md

Related Skills

  • Customer Interviews
  • Continuous Discovery
  • Product Experiments
  • Defining Icp

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Help users identify unique distribution advantages and master the lifecycle of acquisition channels to build a sustainable engine for growth and retention.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

RefoundAI/lenny-skills1.4천2026년 7월 17일 업데이트

Help users build functional product prototypes from natural language or visual mocks using AI coding tools. This skill enables product leaders to bypass engineering bottlenecks and validate ideas through hands-on building.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

RefoundAI/lenny-skills1.4천2026년 7월 17일 업데이트

ai-evals

무료

Help users build robust infrastructure for measuring, monitoring, and iterating on AI product performance using human, code-based, and LLM-as-a-judge methodologies.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

RefoundAI/lenny-skills1.4천2026년 7월 17일 업데이트

Help users interact with probabilistic models by designing interfaces that manage fluidity, intent, and agency while maintaining trust and control.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

RefoundAI/lenny-skills1.4천2026년 7월 17일 업데이트

Help users decide where to apply AI effectively, manage the transition from deterministic to probabilistic software, and build long-term defensibility through verticalization and proprietary data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

RefoundAI/lenny-skills1.4천2026년 7월 17일 업데이트

Help users convert massive volumes of qualitative and quantitative feedback into high-confidence product decisions through rigorous synthesis and internal immersion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

RefoundAI/lenny-skills1.4천2026년 7월 17일 업데이트

RefoundAI의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고