본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

omh-commit-pr-authoring

[omh] Commit message or pull-request body to write for a change: draft it in the repository's own convention, with `Tested:` listing only commands observed to run and everything prepared but not run under `Not-tested:`. Use when the user says: commit-pr-authoring, commit message, commit messages, write the commit message, draft the commit message, commit body, squash message, pr body.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md8.9 KB
  • references/commit-and-pr-conventions.md4.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Commit Pr Authoring

This is a Hermes-native commit-pr-authoring workflow skill.

Why This Exists

commit-pr-authoring exists because nothing in the catalog authored the commit or the PR body. code-review reads a commit message as a thing to review and github-event-ops routes PR events, so the text an engineer writes several times a day had no owner, and nothing applied the observed-versus-prepared split to it.

First Steps

  • Read the PR template and the recent log, and record the convention before drafting.
  • Build the evidence ledger: each command, observed with its exit status or not_observed.

Do Not Use When

  • The request is to find defects in the diff or judge whether the change is ready; use omh-code-review.
  • The request routes an incoming pull-request, issue, or CI webhook event; use omh-github-event-ops.
  • The request turns a chat report into a GitHub issue; use omh-github-issue-intake.
  • The request is release notes or product copy for readers outside the repository; use omh-content-operator.

Examples

Good example:

  • Prompt: write the commit message for this change, the unit tests ran but I did not run the e2e suite
  • Expected behavior: Read the log's subject shape and trailers, record the unit test command as observed and the e2e suite as not_observed, and draft the message with the unit tests under Tested: and the e2e suite under Not-tested:.
  • Why: The ledger decides which line each command lands on, not the wording of the request.

Bad example:

  • Prompt: say the integration tests pass, they will once CI runs
  • Expected behavior: Keep the integration tests under Not-tested: until an observed run exists, and say CI has not been observed.
  • Why: A prediction worded as a result is exactly what Tested: must not carry.

Completion Checklist

  • The convention read names the template and log sample it drew from.
  • Every Tested: entry maps to an observed ledger row with its exit status.
  • Every prepared, skipped, or unobserved command is under Not-tested: with its reason.
  • The draft lists the paths to stage, and any state-claiming subject prefix maps to an observed ledger row.
  • Nothing was committed, pushed, or opened by OMH.

Recovery Notes

  • If no run records exist, draft with an empty Tested: and every command under Not-tested:, and ask for the observed output.
  • If the repository has no template or visible convention, say so and use a plain subject and body rather than importing one.

Workflow Lane

  • Current lane: Coding handoff (idea-to-deploy, llm-app-dev, cto-loop, deploy-and-monitor, code-review, build-failure-triage, verification-gate, security-safety-review, +28 more) - coding owners, handoffs, review, CI, and merge evidence.
  • If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
  • Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md').

When to Use

Use when a change is ready to record and the user wants its commit message or pull-request body written: the repository's template and recent log read first, the subject and body in that convention, the trailers the repo requires, and a Tested: line that lists only commands observed to run, with everything prepared but not run under Not-tested:. OMH prepares the text; the commit, the push, and the PR are the user's or the executor's.

Strong routing signals: `commit-pr-authoring`, `commit message`, `commit messages`, `write the commit message`, `draft the commit message`, `commit body`, `squash message`, `pr body`, `pr description`, `pull request body`, `pull request description`, `draft the pr`, `write the pr`, `pr template`, `tested trailer`, `not-tested trailer`, `lore trailers`

Catalog Metadata

Category: verification Phase: commit-pr-authoring Hermes role: reviewer Quality tier: evidence-ledger-gated Reasoning demand: standard

Quality bar:

  • Read the template and at least the last few commits before writing a word, and record what was found.
  • Build the evidence ledger first; the Tested: and validation sections are projections of it, not prose.
  • Write the subject in the repository's shape and the body as why the change exists, not a restated diff.
  • Load references/commit-and-pr-conventions.md for trailer, sign-off, and template-section mapping instead of improvising them.
  • Put Closes #N on its own line only when every success criterion of that issue is met.

Handoff policy:

Keep the convention read, the drafted text, and the evidence ledger in Hermes. The commit, the push, and opening the PR are executor or user actions; OMH never performs them, and a command reaches Tested: only from an observed run record.

Required inputs:

  • the change: the diff, the staged files, or the branch compared with its base
  • the repository's PR template and a sample of its recent commit log
  • the commands that ran for this change, each with its observed exit status
  • the commands that were prepared, planned, or skipped, and why
  • the issue or goal the change closes, when there is one

Expected outputs:

  • repo_convention_read/v1
  • evidence_ledger/v1
  • commit_message_draft/v1
  • pr_body_draft/v1 when a PR is being opened

Artifact expectations:

  • repo_convention_read/v1 names the template path, the subject shape and trailers seen in the recent log, and the sign-off rule, or says which of them was not found
  • evidence_ledger/v1 lists every command with observed or not_observed; observed carries the exit status and where it was seen
  • commit_message_draft/v1 and pr_body_draft/v1 take Tested: and the validation section only from observed ledger rows
  • commit_message_draft/v1 lists the paths the commit covers, so whoever records it stages those paths and nothing else

Safety rules:

  • List a command under Tested: only when the evidence ledger records it as observed; a command that was prepared, planned, or described as passing without a run record goes under Not-tested:, whatever the wording says.
  • Never commit, amend, push, or open the PR; OMH prepares the text and the user or the executor records it.
  • Name the paths a commit covers and have them staged by path; never write or recommend git add -A or git add ., which sweeps unrelated dirty files into the commit.
  • A subject prefix that claims a state, such as [verified], [reviewed], or [tested], is a projection of the evidence ledger: write it only when the repository's log uses that prefix and the ledger holds the observed row it claims, never as a default.
  • Read the repository's own template and recent log before drafting; impose no convention the repository does not use.
  • Do not claim CI, review, or merge state in the text unless it was observed, and name what was not.
  • Never put credentials, tokens, private URLs, or raw transcripts into a commit message or PR body.

Runtime Evidence

Record observed delegation results; otherwise return not_available or not_observed. Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.

  • Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes. Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion. Reply in the user's own words and the host's own voice: its SOUL.md persona owns reply language, tone, speech level, and sentence endings, progress updates included (where it sets no language, use the one the user wrote in), and OMH shapes structure and content only; OMH's record terms (surface, lane, wrapper, handoff, evidence boundary, not_observed) stay in records and tool calls, never in the sentence the user reads unless they ask about one; and when a stop condition or a decision the user owns ends the turn, offer the next action as a question rather than declaring what will not be done.

Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.

Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md'). Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Onboard a new model generation or sibling into oh-my-hermes: probe router recognition, research the official contract, write trait-to-counter calibration, place routing in both lanes, price from documented list only, gate machine config on a served route, prove with the gates, close with a benchmark pair. Use when a model family ships a new generation (for example "Fable 5.1 is out", "GLM 5.4 shipped", "onboard new model", "add model to chains").

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.4천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

[omh] Screen-reader or keyboard accessibility gaps: prepare WCAG, keyboard, focus, screen-reader, target-size, and reflow evidence gates for UI surfaces. Use when the user says: accessibility-audit, accessibility audit, a11y audit, a11y architect, wcag audit, wcag 2.2, wcag 2.2 aa, accessibility pass.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.4천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

[omh] Hermes badges unlocked and achievement progress: achievements observation: summarize hermes-achievements badges, tiers, recent unlocks, and progress from local plugin artifacts. Use when the user says: achievements, achievement, badges, badge, my badges, show achievements, achievement summary, unlocked badges.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.4천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

[omh] Technical proposal facing adversarial scrutiny: independent perspectives attack a proposal, then distill into a bundle a separate planner consumes. Use when the user says: adversarial-consensus, adversarial planning, adversarial plan review, red team this plan, red-team this plan, red team the proposal, multi-perspective review, multiple perspectives.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.4천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

[omh] Coordinating several agents or profiles: coordinate multiple Hermes profiles or agents with task, handoff, heartbeat, blocker, and completion states. Use when the user says: agent-board, agent board, kanban, multi-agent, multi agent, multi agent board, multiple hermes agents, multiple hermes profiles.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.4천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

[omh] Agent is stuck, looping, or drifting: capture a stuck, looping, drifting, or repeatedly failing agent run, diagnose the likely failure pattern, and prepare the smallest safe recovery action. Use when the user says: agent-debug, agent debug, agent debugging, agent introspection, agent self-debug, self-debug, self debugging, looping agent.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.4천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

rlaope의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고