본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

omh-context-budget-review

Plan how to preserve essential information during long agent tasks within limits on tokens, the units used to measure model input and output. Define budgets, summarization checkpoints, and recovery steps while keeping the full objective intact.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

[omh] Context window or token budget at risk: plan compact context, token/cost budgets, summarization checkpoints, and overflow recovery before long agent work. Use when the user says: context-budget-review, context budget review, context budget, token budget review, token budget, prompt budget, prompt caching, prompt cache.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Planning information retention for long research or coding tasks
  • Preparing essential context for a new session
  • Scheduling summaries and checking for lost information
  • Planning around token, cost, or latency constraints

포함된 파일(3)

  • SKILL.md9.0 KB
  • references/cache-placement.md1.8 KB
  • references/route-capacity.md4.9 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Context Budget Review

This is a Hermes-native context-budget-review workflow skill.

Why This Exists

context-budget-review ports ECC's context-budget and token-budget instincts into OMH as a compactness gate that protects long-running work without redefining success around a smaller task.

Do Not Use When

  • The user asks only what this Hermes session has used or cost so far; Hermes' /usage shows this session's tokens and context, /insights estimates cost across recent sessions, and the omh_run_summary tool relays this conversation's recorded tokens and cost.
  • The user asks to continue a loopable goal; use ulw-loop unless budget planning is the explicit blocker.
  • The task is a short one-step answer with no meaningful context risk.

Examples

Good example:

  • Prompt: context-budget-review 이 장기 PR 작업에서 어떤 맥락을 꼭 유지하고 언제 요약해야 하는지 잡아줘.
  • Expected behavior: Prepare context_budget_plan/v1, must_keep_context_pack/v1, checkpoint plan, risk register, and overflow recovery route.
  • Why: The request is about preserving context quality during long-running agent work.

Bad example:

  • Prompt: context-budget-review 토큰 아끼려고 원래 목표를 더 작은 목표로 바꿔줘.
  • Expected behavior: Reject goal shrinking and instead compact context while preserving the full objective and evidence gaps.
  • Why: Budget review optimizes context handling, not the user's requested end state.

Completion Checklist

  • The run or workflow scope, metric window, failure modes, and cost/latency boundary are named.
  • Local telemetry, provider truth, billing truth, and completion evidence are separate states.
  • Warnings name the next measurement or operator review action.

Recovery Notes

  • If provider metrics are unavailable, report only local metadata and mark provider truth not_observed.
  • If cost or latency looks risky, surface a warning plus the next measurement rather than a completion claim.

Workflow Lane

  • Current lane: Automation and status (achievements, workspace-audit, production-audit, live-incident-response, automation-blueprint, github-event-ops, github-issue-intake, buzz, +40 more) - schedules, status, health, and ops review.
  • If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
  • Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md').

When to Use

Use before long-running research, coding, review, or multi-agent work when context, token, cost, or summary drift could break quality.

Strong routing signals: `context-budget-review`, `context budget review`, `context budget`, `token budget review`, `token budget`, `prompt budget`, `prompt caching`, `prompt cache`, `cache hygiene`, `context compaction`, `compact context`, `too much context`, `context window`, `running out of context`, `hand off to a new session`, `summarization checkpoint`, `budget this task`, `컨텍스트 예산`, `토큰 예산`, `컨텍스트 압축`, `요약 체크포인트`

Catalog Metadata

Category: observability Phase: context-budget-review Hermes role: tracker Quality tier: context-budget-gated Reasoning demand: standard

Quality bar:

  • Name must-keep context before summarizing or delegating long work.
  • Separate durable requirements, volatile status, file refs, verification evidence, and open blockers.
  • Define checkpoint cadence, overflow recovery, and continuity verification.
  • Use bounded copy while preserving the full objective and evidence gaps.
  • Count the must-keep pack by item class, so a replaced pack reports which class lost entries instead of only that a digest moved; a pack that recorded no classes reports the comparison unavailable and never reports zero items.
  • Keep prompt-prefix placement cache-stable: fixed section order, volatile bytes never above the fold, mid-run changes as appended messages never system-prompt mutations — load references/cache-placement.md for the placement rules.
  • On Hermes, bind the summarization checkpoint to Hermes' own compaction: render the must-keep classes as one short focus topic and hand the person /compress <focus> to run when the checkpoint is due. OMH never compresses, and a compaction is observed only from Hermes' own reply to that command.
  • On Hermes, offer /compress --preview <focus> only in the classic CLI or on a messaging platform, never when the surface is unknown, and count it as a preview only when the reply says Preview — no changes made.: a modern TUI whose /compress does not parse the flag compresses for real with the flag in its focus. Context occupancy is the person's /usage reading when shared, otherwise an estimate.

Handoff policy:

Keep budget design and status narration in Hermes. Provider billing, exact token usage, runtime compaction, and executor cost evidence require observed wrapper, runtime, or provider data.

Route binding:

  • Bind the plan to the session's published context_budget_plan/v1 (agent/operator: omh context budget-plan prepare|rebind|status --session-ref <session>). Unpublished capacity holds as capacity_unknown_hold and inherits nothing; a hold or checkpoint action is a prepared obligation, not compaction, usage, or billing evidence. Rules: references/route-capacity.md.

Required inputs:

  • task or workflow scope
  • expected duration, artifacts, and handoff surfaces
  • available context sources and must-keep facts
  • token, cost, latency, or message-size constraints when known

Expected outputs:

  • context_budget_plan/v1
  • must_keep_context_pack/v1
  • must_keep_item_class_delta/v1 when a pack replaces an earlier one
  • summarization_checkpoint_plan/v1
  • budget_risk_register/v1
  • overflow_recovery_route/v1
  • not-evidence boundary

Artifact expectations:

  • context_budget_plan/v1 with scope, max visible context, source priority, discard rules, and checkpoint cadence
  • must_keep_context_pack/v1 with durable facts, file refs, decisions, PR/CI state, and blocked assumptions
  • must_keep_item_class_delta/v1 naming the item class that lost entries rather than reporting a digest difference, over the closed vocabulary prohibitions, decisions, open_questions, requirements, paths, pr_state, verification_gaps
  • summarization_checkpoint_plan/v1 with when to compact, what to preserve, and how to verify continuity
  • budget_risk_register/v1 separating estimated cost/token/latency risk from provider-observed truth

Safety rules:

  • Do not claim provider billing, exact token counts, or runtime compaction occurred without observed evidence.
  • Do not drop user requirements, file paths, PR state, verification gaps, or explicit constraints during compaction.
  • Keep estimated budget risk, observed usage, checkpoint summaries, and completion evidence separate.
  • Do not use budget pressure as a reason to shrink the user's requested end state.

Runtime Evidence

Preferred harness for this skill: context-budget-review.

omh runtime record --skill context-budget-review --harness context-budget-review --status started

Record observed delegation results; otherwise return not_available or not_observed. Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.

  • Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes. Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion. Reply in the user's own words and the host's own voice: its SOUL.md persona owns reply language, tone, speech level, and sentence endings, progress updates included (where it sets no language, use the one the user wrote in), and OMH shapes structure and content only; OMH's record terms (surface, lane, wrapper, handoff, evidence boundary, not_observed) stay in records and tool calls, never in the sentence the user reads unless they ask about one; and when a real unresolved user decision or a useful briefing discussion remains, offer one specific, content-linked question. Completed work needs no question; omit unrelated non-action footers and generic offers to continue.

Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.

Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md'). Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

dag-ulw

무료

Coordinate a large job by splitting it into small tasks with explicit dependencies. Run ready tasks in parallel through Hermes, verify the combined result separately, and repair failures within defined limits before reporting completed work and remaining gaps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Delivering a feature across multiple modules
  • Coordinating a migration with ordered steps
  • Managing a broad cleanup across separate work areas
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.7천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Guide the addition of a new model generation to oh-my-hermes. The workflow checks model recognition, official specifications, routing rules that select models for tasks, documented pricing, and live access, then validates changes with tests and comparative benchmarks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Add a new model generation to oh-my-hermes
  • Check API model IDs and dated snapshot recognition
  • Update model selection chains and related documentation
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.7천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Prepare an accessibility audit for an interface using WCAG 2.2 AA, an accessibility standard. Organize evidence for keyboard use, screen readers, contrast, target size, and zoom behavior, then document findings, missing checks, and remediation handoffs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing checkout accessibility against WCAG 2.2 AA
  • Checking keyboard access and focus order
  • Organizing screen-reader labels and announcement evidence
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.7천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Summarize earned badges, recent unlocks, achievement tiers, and progress using local files from the hermes-achievements plugin. Prepare a badge list or report section while making missing information and the limits of the recorded snapshot clear.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking earned badges
  • Reviewing recently unlocked achievements
  • Finding progress toward the next achievement tier
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.7천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Examine a technical proposal through independent perspectives, challenge their findings, and resolve objections. The result is a structured set of constraints, decisions, risks, and open questions for a separate planning workflow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing a technical proposal before planning
  • Challenging assumptions behind a migration
  • Organizing risks and unresolved questions
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.7천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

Coordinate multiple Hermes agents or profiles through a shared task board. Organize assignments, handoffs, activity updates, blockers, and completion states, while distinguishing planned actions from work supported by observed results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Coordinate agent roles for a launch checklist
  • Track task handoffs and blockers
  • Prepare work for pickup across profiles or after a restart
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.7천2026년 10월 25일 업데이트

rlaope의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고