본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

omh-image-cards

Prepare image card prompts from meeting notes, reports, pull requests, research, and releases. The skill organizes readable text and visual direction around the source and subject, while keeping prompt preparation separate from image generation, review, and delivery.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

[omh] Infographic card for meeting notes, a report, or PR: image prompt cards - turn meetings, reports, PRs, issues, research, and releases into domain-aware image prompt cards. Use when the user says: img-summary, img summary, visual prompt card, image card, image generation, image edit, edit this image, remove the background.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Prepare a vertical summary card from meeting notes
  • Plan a pull request summary card for reviewers
  • Prepare a release announcement image prompt
  • Define background removal instructions for a supplied image

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md13.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Img Summary

This is a Hermes-native img-summary workflow skill.

Why This Exists

img-summary exists so Hermes can turn common communication work into provider-neutral image-card prompts while adapting format, domain mood, background, texture, lighting, camera, and poster grammar, and keeping generation, QA, and delivery as observed-only evidence.

Do Not Use When

  • The user needs a deck, PDF, spreadsheet, HWP, Markdown package, or binary file export plan; use omh-materials-package.
  • The user wants a text-only report, leadership brief, or PPT-ready outline; use omh-report-package.
  • The user asks OMH to directly generate, inspect, upload, or post an image without a wrapper-supplied observed evidence path.

Examples

Good example:

  • Prompt: img-summary make a PR summary card for reviewers.
  • Expected behavior: Prepare visual_prompt_card/v1 with the PR review infographic format, copy mode, generation prompt, negative prompt, and not-evidence boundaries.
  • Why: The request asks for an image-card communication artifact, not a PDF/deck package or hidden image generation.

Bad example:

  • Prompt: img-summary prove this generated card was posted to Slack.
  • Expected behavior: Ask for visual_observation/v1 delivery evidence or report delivery as not_observed.
  • Why: A prompt card cannot prove generated image, QA, or delivery evidence.

Completion Checklist

  • The material source, target format, audience, structure, and QA expectation are named.
  • Binary export, rendering, formula recalculation, attachment, and delivery stay observed-only.
  • The next action identifies whether the package is planned, generated, QA-ready, or blocked.

Recovery Notes

  • If a renderer or file tool is missing, keep the package prepared and expose the generation handoff.
  • If render QA is unavailable, mark the artifact unverified and request the smallest visual/file check.

Workflow Lane

  • Current lane: Materials and visual summaries (show-reel, design-orchestration, apple-design, design-quality-gate, award-bar-score, frontend, accessibility-audit, visual-qa, +7 more) - web, accessibility, visual QA, files, and packages.
  • If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
  • Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md').

When to Use

Use when Hermes should prepare a source-specific visual or supplied-image edit prompt without claiming generation or transformation.

Strong routing signals: `img-summary`, `img summary`, `visual prompt card`, `image card`, `image generation`, `image edit`, `edit this image`, `remove the background`, `background removal`, `image generation features`, `image generation support`, `image tool support`, `image feature`, `image features`, `visual generation`, `visual generation support`, `visual card support`, `image summary card`, `summary image`, `summary card`, `explainer image`, `feature explainer image`, `feature explanation image`, `product explainer image`, `product explainer card`, `infographic`, `one-page infographic`, `workflow image`, `workflow card`, `shareable image`, `explain this as an image`, `make an image explaining`, `image explaining the cron feature`, `make an image explaining the cron feature`, `make a visual summary of this PR`, `visual summary`, `picture card`, `meeting notes picture card`, `vertical card`, `vertical summary image`, `vertical image card`, `meeting image`, `meeting summary image`, `conversation summary image`, `meeting notes image`, `pr card`, `pr summary card`, `pull request card`, `review card`, `issue card`, `bug triage card`, `feedback card`, `triage card`, `research card`, `report card`, `report summary card`, `report digest card`, `news briefing card`, `competitor-news briefing card`, `briefing card`, `release announcement image`, `release notes image`, `release notes thumbnail`, `announcement card`, `multilingual img-summary`, `이미지 편집`, `배경 제거`, `회의록 세로 요약 이미지`, `회의 요약 이미지`, `회의록을 보기 좋은 세로 이미지로 요약`, `회의록을 보기 좋은 세로 이미지로 요약해줘`, `세로 이미지로 요약`, `세로 이미지로 요약해줘`, `보기 좋은 세로 이미지`, `PR 요약 카드`, `PR 내용을 리뷰어에게 공유할 이미지 카드`, `PR 내용을 리뷰어에게 공유할 이미지 카드로 만들어줘`, `이슈 트리아지 카드`, `버그 트리아지 카드`, `피드백 카드`, `리포트 요약 카드`, `보고서 요약 카드`, `경쟁사 뉴스 브리핑 카드`, `리서치 브리핑 카드`, `릴리즈 노트 발표 이미지`, `릴리즈 노트 썸네일`, `업데이트 발표 이미지`, `세로 이미지 카드`, `이미지 카드`, `회의록 이미지 카드`, `회의록을 세로 이미지 카드`, `설명 이미지`, `설명하는 인포그래픽`, `기능 설명 이미지`, `기능 소개 이미지`, `인포그래픽`, `인포그래픽 만들어줘`, `이미지 요약 카드`, `요약 이미지`, `요약 카드`, `썸네일`, `썸네일 만들어줘`, `썸네일로 만들어줘`, `카드 이미지`, `이미지로 요약`, `이미지로 요약해줘`, `이미지 생성`, `이미지 생성해줘`, `이미지 만들어줘`, `크론 기능 설명 이미지`, `크론 기능 설명 사진`, `크론 기능 설명 사진 하나 만들어줘`, `사진 카드`, `사진처럼 만들어줘`, `PR 요약 사진`, `공유용 이미지`, `안내 이미지`, `워크플로우 이미지`, `이미지로 설명`, `이미지 하나 만들어줘`

Catalog Metadata

Category: materials Phase: visual-prompt-card Hermes role: operator Quality tier: visual-card-gated Reasoning demand: standard

Quality bar:

  • Pick one canonical source kind: meeting, github_pr, issue_feedback, research_briefing, report_summary, or release_announcement.
  • Use the source-specific format profile instead of forcing every visual into the same grid.
  • Expose the detected domain_key so wrappers and users can explain why a domain-specific scene and poster archetype were selected.
  • Adapt scene, texture, depth, lighting, camera, motifs, palette, and composition to domains such as security, commerce, sports, fashion, finance, developer work, or research.
  • Resolve a poster archetype such as Swiss grid, cinematic key-art, editorial magazine, constructivist photomontage, data infographic, product ad, technical brutalist, museum exhibition, sports event, or luxury lookbook.
  • Ask image tools to render the domain-specific environment first, then place readable card modules on top; reject flat vector clipart, plain gradients, generic glass cards, color-swapped templates, and low-detail wallpaper.
  • Preserve a stable OMH img-summary format contract: source badge, headline, source-kind subtitle, content modules, evidence footer, and small OMH generated mark.
  • Use long_scroll or extended rows when the card needs a document-style vertical canvas with more sections or denser text.
  • Keep visible card text readable and faithful to supplied source or structured sections; do not shrink paragraphs into tiny poster copy.
  • Separate prompt prepared, image generated, visual QA passed, and delivered states.
  • Bind an image result to the card digest, action, attempt, and content digest, then warn on route mismatch, unknown route, stale card, digest drift, and response reuse rather than resolving any of them.
  • For transformations, preserve requested identity, composition, text, and protected regions; verify the observed result against the edit brief before a PASS claim.
  • Prefer img-summary over materials-package only when the request asks for an image, visual card, or summary card.
  • Use materials/report workflows only after an observed generated file needs packaging.

Handoff policy:

Keep card copy shaping, source-kind selection, language mode, prompt assembly, and evidence narration in Hermes. Use wrapper-reported image generation only as an optional action; record generated image, visual QA, and delivery claims only from visual_observation/v1 evidence.

Required inputs:

  • source/image
  • create/edit
  • format
  • ratio
  • headline or source text
  • audience
  • language mode
  • card sections, source excerpts, or preserve/remove constraints

Expected outputs:

  • visual_prompt_card/v1
  • image_generation_setup/v1 when generator capability is missing
  • source-specific visual format
  • detected domain_key
  • domain-aware visual theme
  • poster_archetype/v1
  • poster archetype visual grammar
  • background, texture, camera, and lighting direction
  • image-safe card copy
  • generation prompt
  • image transformation brief when editing a supplied image
  • negative prompt
  • quality checks
  • visual evidence boundary
  • visual_generation_receipt/v1 when a producer reports an image attempt
  • requested route separate from observed route

Artifact expectations:

  • visual_prompt_card/v1 prompt card when prepared
  • image_generation_setup/v1 fallback when image_generation_capability/v1 is unknown or prompt_only
  • visual_observation/v1 only when a wrapper or user records generated image, visual QA, or delivery evidence
  • visual_generation_receipt/v1 only when a producer reports one image attempt, with unattested route fields left unknown

Safety rules:

  • Do not call image providers, LLMs, APIs, or network services from OMH core.
  • Do not claim image generation, visual QA, posting, sharing, attachment, or delivery from a prepared prompt card.
  • Require visual_observation/v1 before claiming generated image, visual QA, or delivery evidence.
  • Report requested route apart from observed route; leave provider, model, quality, operation, dimensions, and credential class unknown unless visual_generation_receipt/v1 attests them.
  • Do not infer an observed provider, model, or quality from configuration, capability state, or a returned file.
  • A failed or partial visual_generation_receipt/v1 keeps its failure stage and is not generated-image evidence.
  • Raw source text may become only an extractive draft; do not fabricate summaries, owners, decisions, test results, or conclusions.
  • Show generate_visual_image only when wrapper context reports image_generation_capability/v1 as connected, and still treat it as wrapper-owned action rather than evidence.
  • When image_generation_capability/v1 is unknown or prompt_only, ask which image tool to use and route to image_generation_setup/v1 instead of pretending generation can start.
  • For image edits, require a supplied image reference and state preserve, remove, replace, crop, and output constraints without claiming the source image was loaded.
  • On Hermes, report image_generation_capability/v1 as connected when image_generate is in your tool list or tool_search finds it, since Hermes offers that tool only while an image backend is configured, and as prompt_only otherwise; never infer it from a Hermes version, a provider key, or a model name.
  • A supplied-image edit goes through that tool only when its own description offers to edit an existing image; when it says text-to-image only, the edit stays a prompt card. A result with success: true names the file or URL in image and backs one visual_generation_receipt/v1 attempt, with every route field the result does not state left unknown; a generated-image claim still needs visual_observation/v1, and visual QA and delivery stay separate.

Runtime Evidence

Preferred harness for this skill: img-summary.

omh runtime record --skill img-summary --harness img-summary --status started

Record observed delegation results; otherwise return not_available or not_observed. Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.

  • Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes. Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion. Reply in the user's own words and the host's own voice: its SOUL.md persona owns reply language, tone, speech level, and sentence endings, progress updates included (where it sets no language, use the one the user wrote in), and OMH shapes structure and content only; OMH's record terms (surface, lane, wrapper, handoff, evidence boundary, not_observed) stay in records and tool calls, never in the sentence the user reads unless they ask about one; and when a stop condition or a decision the user owns ends the turn, offer the next action as a question rather than declaring what will not be done.

Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.

Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md'). Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

dag-ulw

무료

Coordinate a large job by splitting it into small tasks with explicit dependencies. Run ready tasks in parallel through Hermes, verify the combined result separately, and repair failures within defined limits before reporting completed work and remaining gaps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Delivering a feature across multiple modules
  • Coordinating a migration with ordered steps
  • Managing a broad cleanup across separate work areas
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6천2026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Guide the addition of a new model generation to oh-my-hermes. The workflow checks model recognition, official specifications, routing rules that select models for tasks, documented pricing, and live access, then validates changes with tests and comparative benchmarks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Add a new model generation to oh-my-hermes
  • Check API model IDs and dated snapshot recognition
  • Update model selection chains and related documentation
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6천2026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Prepare an accessibility audit for an interface using WCAG 2.2 AA, an accessibility standard. Organize evidence for keyboard use, screen readers, contrast, target size, and zoom behavior, then document findings, missing checks, and remediation handoffs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing checkout accessibility against WCAG 2.2 AA
  • Checking keyboard access and focus order
  • Organizing screen-reader labels and announcement evidence
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6천2026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Summarize earned badges, recent unlocks, achievement tiers, and progress using local files from the hermes-achievements plugin. Prepare a badge list or report section while making missing information and the limits of the recorded snapshot clear.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking earned badges
  • Reviewing recently unlocked achievements
  • Finding progress toward the next achievement tier
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6천2026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Examine a technical proposal through independent perspectives, challenge their findings, and resolve objections. The result is a structured set of constraints, decisions, risks, and open questions for a separate planning workflow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing a technical proposal before planning
  • Challenging assumptions behind a migration
  • Organizing risks and unresolved questions
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6천2026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Coordinate multiple Hermes agents or profiles through a shared task board. Organize assignments, handoffs, activity updates, blockers, and completion states, while distinguishing planned actions from work supported by observed results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Coordinate agent roles for a launch checklist
  • Track task handoffs and blockers
  • Prepare work for pickup across profiles or after a restart
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6천2026년 10월 22일 업데이트

rlaope의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고