본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

omh-security-event-response

Organize responses to dependency vulnerabilities, leaked credentials, and dependency license concerns in existing code. Assess whether vulnerable code can be reached, order containment steps, and define the evidence needed before closing the event.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

[omh] Security event on the code already shipped -- a CVE in a dependency, a secret committed to the repo, a license question, an advisory: triage reachability and severity, contain in order, and never close a leaked secret before its rotation is observed. Use when the user says: security-event-response, security event response, cve, triage this cve, cve in our dependency, cve in a dependency, security advisory, dependabot alert.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Assessing a dependency CVE or Dependabot security alert
  • Planning a response to an API key committed to Git
  • Reviewing a dependency license against product distribution
  • Checking evidence before closing a security event

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md9.8 KB
  • references/event-containment-order.md3.9 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Security Event Response

This is a Hermes-native security-event-response workflow skill.

Why This Exists

security-event-response exists because an event had no owner: security-safety-review and application-threat-model review a design before it ships, and a CVE, a committed secret, or a license question was answered by onboarding, review, or an achievements lane with no containment order at all.

First Steps

  • Classify the event and state its exposure window before proposing any step.
  • For a leaked secret, order the rotation and its observed rejection before any history rewrite.

Do Not Use When

  • Nothing has happened yet and the ask is a review of prompts, tools, or permissions before execution; use omh-security-safety-review, which also owns a planned rotation with no exposure.
  • The subject is a design's assets, trust boundaries, and attack scenarios; use omh-application-threat-model.
  • A dependency moves to a new version as routine maintenance with no advisory or leak attached, such as a dependabot bump; use omh-refactor-plan.
  • The question is a contract, a privacy obligation, or legal advice beyond a dependency's declared terms; use omh-legal-compliance-review.
  • Production is down or degraded right now and the ask is command of the incident; use omh-live-incident-response.

Examples

Good example:

  • Prompt: we committed a secret, what now
  • Expected behavior: Record the credential type, scope, and exposure window, then prepare containment_plan/v1: revoke and replace, observe the old credential rejected, audit its use in the window, and only then rewrite history; the closure verdict stays open until the rotation is observed.
  • Why: A rewritten history does not revoke a secret that was already cloned or scraped.

Bad example:

  • Prompt: just force-push the history without the key and we are done
  • Expected behavior: Refuse to close: rotate first, observe the old key rejected, then rewrite, and name what is still unobserved.
  • Why: Rewriting history first leaves a live credential in every clone and cache made before the push.

Completion Checklist

  • The event kind, source, and exposure window are stated.
  • Every severity call cites the reachable path or its observed absence.
  • A leaked secret's rotation precedes any history rewrite in the plan.
  • The closure verdict is closed only when the rotation or fixed version is observed.
  • No secret value appears anywhere, and OMH scanned, contacted, or rotated nothing.

Recovery Notes

  • If the exposure window is unknown, treat the secret as exposed from its first push and say so.
  • If no reachability evidence is available, keep the advisory's own severity and mark the adjustment unverified.

Workflow Lane

  • Current lane: Coding handoff (idea-to-deploy, llm-app-dev, cto-loop, deploy-and-monitor, code-review, build-failure-triage, verification-gate, security-safety-review, +28 more) - coding owners, handoffs, review, CI, and merge evidence.
  • If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
  • Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md').

When to Use

Use when a security event has already happened to code that exists: a CVE or advisory in a dependency, a secret or credential committed or pushed, a dependency whose license may not fit the product, or an advisory that forces a major version. The output is reachability, a severity call, containment steps in order, and what must be observed before the event closes; OMH never scans, never contacts a registry, and rotates nothing.

Strong routing signals: `security-event-response`, `security event response`, `cve`, `triage this cve`, `cve in our dependency`, `cve in a dependency`, `security advisory`, `dependabot alert`, `dependabot security`, `vulnerable dependency`, `vulnerability in our dependency`, `reachability analysis`, `npm audit`, `committed a secret`, `committed an api key`, `leaked secret`, `leaked a secret`, `leaked credential`, `leaked api key`, `leaked an api key`, `leaked aws key`, `leaked an aws key`, `secret in git history`, `secret in the history`, `dependency license`, `dependency's license`, `license ok`, `license compatibility`, `license compatible`, `gpl dependency`, `agpl dependency`

Catalog Metadata

Category: review Phase: security-event-response Hermes role: reviewer Quality tier: event-closure-gated Reasoning demand: standard

Quality bar:

  • Classify the event first; each kind has its own containment order.
  • Load references/event-containment-order.md for the per-event containment order, the severity adjustment, and the license obligation table instead of recalling them.
  • Adjust severity by reachability: a critical advisory on a function nothing calls is not the same event as one on the request path.
  • Keep prepared, observed, and closed as separate states for every containment step.
  • Hand a fix that needs a planned version jump to its own upgrade plan, and keep this event open until that fix is observed.

Handoff policy:

Keep the event record, the reachability call, the ordered containment plan, and the closure verdict in Hermes. Scanner output, advisory text, registry metadata, rotations, revocations, and history rewrites are recorded only from executor, operator, or wrapper observed output; OMH never scans, contacts a registry, or rotates a credential.

Required inputs:

  • the event kind: CVE or advisory, leaked secret, license question, or an advisory that forces a major version
  • for a CVE: the advisory id, the affected package and version range, and the installed version from the lockfile
  • for a leaked secret: the credential type and scope, where it was pushed, whether the repository is public, and when
  • for a license: the package, its declared license, and how the product is distributed
  • observed evidence for any containment or closure claim

Expected outputs:

  • security_event_record/v1
  • reachability_analysis/v1 when a vulnerable dependency is involved
  • containment_plan/v1
  • license_fit_verdict/v1 when a license is asked
  • event_closure_verdict/v1

Artifact expectations:

  • security_event_record/v1 names the event kind, the source, the affected package or credential class, and the exposure window, separately from the suspected impact
  • reachability_analysis/v1 names the vulnerable function or path, the repository call sites that reach it or the observed absence of any, and a severity call from the advisory score adjusted by that reachability
  • containment_plan/v1 orders every step; for a leaked secret the rotation and the observed rejection of the old credential come before any history rewrite, because a rewrite does not un-publish a secret already cloned
  • license_fit_verdict/v1 gives the SPDX id, the obligation it triggers for this distribution model, and fits, conflicts, or needs counsel
  • event_closure_verdict/v1 reads closed only when the rotation or the fixed version is recorded observed; a prepared step keeps the event open and is named

Safety rules:

  • A leaked-secret event cannot close while its rotation is prepared rather than observed; event_closure_verdict/v1 names the missing observation instead.
  • Order rotation before history rewriting: revoke and replace the credential, observe the old one rejected, then rewrite history if at all.
  • Never print the secret value, and never paste it into the plan, the handoff, or a search.
  • OMH never runs a scanner, contacts a registry, or rotates a credential; reachability and license facts come from observed output or are marked unverified.
  • Do not call a dependency safe from a version number alone: cite the reachable path or its observed absence.

Runtime Evidence

Record observed delegation results; otherwise return not_available or not_observed. Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.

  • Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes. Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion. Reply in the user's own words and the host's own voice: its SOUL.md persona owns reply language, tone, speech level, and sentence endings, progress updates included (where it sets no language, use the one the user wrote in), and OMH shapes structure and content only; OMH's record terms (surface, lane, wrapper, handoff, evidence boundary, not_observed) stay in records and tool calls, never in the sentence the user reads unless they ask about one; and when a stop condition or a decision the user owns ends the turn, offer the next action as a question rather than declaring what will not be done.

Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.

Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md'). Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

dag-ulw

무료

Coordinate a large job by splitting it into small tasks with explicit dependencies. Run ready tasks in parallel through Hermes, verify the combined result separately, and repair failures within defined limits before reporting completed work and remaining gaps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Delivering a feature across multiple modules
  • Coordinating a migration with ordered steps
  • Managing a broad cleanup across separate work areas
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6천2026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Guide the addition of a new model generation to oh-my-hermes. The workflow checks model recognition, official specifications, routing rules that select models for tasks, documented pricing, and live access, then validates changes with tests and comparative benchmarks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Add a new model generation to oh-my-hermes
  • Check API model IDs and dated snapshot recognition
  • Update model selection chains and related documentation
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6천2026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Prepare an accessibility audit for an interface using WCAG 2.2 AA, an accessibility standard. Organize evidence for keyboard use, screen readers, contrast, target size, and zoom behavior, then document findings, missing checks, and remediation handoffs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing checkout accessibility against WCAG 2.2 AA
  • Checking keyboard access and focus order
  • Organizing screen-reader labels and announcement evidence
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6천2026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Summarize earned badges, recent unlocks, achievement tiers, and progress using local files from the hermes-achievements plugin. Prepare a badge list or report section while making missing information and the limits of the recorded snapshot clear.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking earned badges
  • Reviewing recently unlocked achievements
  • Finding progress toward the next achievement tier
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6천2026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Examine a technical proposal through independent perspectives, challenge their findings, and resolve objections. The result is a structured set of constraints, decisions, risks, and open questions for a separate planning workflow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing a technical proposal before planning
  • Challenging assumptions behind a migration
  • Organizing risks and unresolved questions
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6천2026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Coordinate multiple Hermes agents or profiles through a shared task board. Organize assignments, handoffs, activity updates, blockers, and completion states, while distinguishing planned actions from work supported by observed results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Coordinate agent roles for a launch checklist
  • Track task handoffs and blockers
  • Prepare work for pickup across profiles or after a restart
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6천2026년 10월 22일 업데이트

rlaope의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고