Break down full ARR (ACL Rolling Review) reviewer responses into structured rebuttal units. Use when input contains ARR reviewer fields (Paper Summary, Strengths, Weaknesses, Comments/Suggestions) and numeric scores (Confidence, Soundness, Excitement, Overall Assessment, Reproducibility). Splits weaknesses and comments/suggestions into granular response items while preserving original wording for quoted issues.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Apply the shared template first:
skills/stage1/template/SKILL.mdThen apply only the ARR-specific overrides below.
Extract exactly these five keys (numbers only, decimals allowed):
confidence <- ARR Confidencesoundness <- ARR Soundnessexcitement <- ARR Excitementassessment <- ARR Overall Assessment (number before = sign)reproducibility <- ARR Reproducibility (number before = sign)summary <- Paper Summarystrength <- Summary Of StrengthsSummary Of WeaknessesComments Suggestions And Typos (label as suggestion)# Stage1 ARR Breakdown## Scores must contain exactly the five keys above.2.5, 3.5). Extract only the numeric part before any = or description text.Ethical Concerns, Datasets, Software, Knowledge Of Paper, and certification fields are irrelevant — ignore them.Comments Suggestions And Typos to the suggestion section and split it into atomic issues just as weaknesses are split.아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Verification guide for citations added during rebuttal writing. Use when Stage 2 responses introduce new references, when the Area Chair asks about a cited paper, or when any citation in the rebuttal might have been AI-generated. Prevents the serious credibility damage of fabricated references in reviewer-facing documents.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Summarize extracted paper text into concise Markdown memory for later Stage 2 and Stage 4 background use, with fixed section headings and no fabricated claims.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic quality check for a completed rebuttal document before submission. Use after Stage 3 document compilation or after Stage 5 final remarks writing to verify completeness, tone, factual accuracy, and structural integrity. Catches common rebuttal errors before they reach reviewers.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic review response strategy guide for RebuttalStudio. Use when developing response strategies for reviewer comments, deciding how to classify concerns, or choosing between Accept/Defend/Clarify/Experiment approaches at any stage of the rebuttal pipeline.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Multi-stage rebuttal analysis skill for RebuttalStudio. Use when organizing reviewer comments into stage-specific conference workflows, including stage1 breakdown, stage2 refinement, stage4 multi-round follow-up, and stage5 final remarks generation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Base template for Stage1 reviewer-comment breakdown. Use when creating or extending conference-specific Stage1 skills (for example ICLR, ICML, NeurIPS, ACL) so shared extraction, splitting, and response-mapping logic stays consistent.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.