본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

gaia-architecture-comparison

Compare ruflo and HAL systems for running the GAIA benchmark, an AI evaluation. Examine differences in code execution, browsing, file handling, memory, and model selection to prioritize improvements by expected impact and effort.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Side-by-side comparison of ruflo vs HAL vs other GAIA harnesses — capability gaps, design decisions, and improvement roadmap

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Plan the next round of GAIA improvements
  • Compare code execution and browser capabilities
  • Weigh improvement priorities against implementation effort
  • Introduce new contributors to the benchmark architecture

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md5.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

GAIA Architecture Comparison Skill

Compare ruflo's GAIA benchmark harness against the Princeton HAL reference implementation and other open-source harnesses to understand capability gaps and prioritize improvements.

When to use

  • Planning the next iteration of GAIA work
  • Evaluating which architectural change has the highest pass-rate ROI
  • Onboarding a new contributor to the benchmark codebase

Architecture overview

ruflo harness (current)

gaia-bench run
  └─ gaia-loader.ts      — HF dataset download + cache
  └─ gaia-agent.ts       — multi-turn Anthropic Messages loop
       └─ gaia-tools/    — web_search, file_read, web_browse,
                           image_describe, python_exec
  └─ gaia-voting.ts      — Track A self-consistency (N attempts → majority vote)
  └─ gaia-hardness/      — Track Q difficulty predictor (ADR-136)
  └─ gaia-judge.ts       — two-stage LLM-as-judge scorer

HAL reference (Princeton)

HAL uses a similar loop but with:

  • OpenAI function calling as the tool interface
  • BrowserBase / Playwright for real browser automation
  • Code interpreter sandbox (Jupyter kernel)
  • Larger token budget per turn (4096+)
  • Full 300-question evaluation set

Key differences

DimensionrufloHAL referenceGap
Question count53 (partial L1)300 (full L1)Use --limit 165 for full L1
Web searchDuckDuckGo / Google CSEBrowserBase liveAdd Playwright or Browserless
Code executionpython_exec stubReal Jupyter kernelImplement real sandbox
Image OCRimage_describe (Gemini)GPT-4V / GeminiFunctionally equivalent
File handlingfile_readFull PDF/XLSX/ZIP parserExpand file_read
Self-consistencyvoting.ts (Track A)Not in referenceruflo advantage
Hardness routingpredictor.ts (Track Q)Not in referenceruflo advantage
MemoryAgentDB HNSWNoneruflo advantage
Pass-rate L1~20.8% (iter 23)74.6% (HAL Sonnet 4.5)~54 pp gap

Gap analysis

Primary gaps (high impact)

  1. Real code execution — many L2/L3 questions require running Python to compute a numerical answer. The current python_exec tool is a stub. Implementing a real sandbox (E2B, Pyodide, or subprocess) is the single highest-ROI change.

  2. Full question set — running 53/300 L1 questions underestimates true pass-rate because the first 53 skew easier. Run --limit 165 (full L1) for a comparable HAL score.

  3. Real browser — web_browse currently fetches raw HTML. Replacing it with Playwright/Browserless for JavaScript-rendered pages would unlock many web navigation questions.

Secondary gaps (medium impact)

  1. Structured file parsing — PDF, XLSX, and ZIP attachments require dedicated parsers. file_read currently handles plain text and images only.

  2. Turn budget — 12 turns may be insufficient for complex multi-step questions. HAL uses up to 20 turns for L3.

  3. System prompt tuning — HAL's system prompt is more elaborate and explicitly instructs the model to use tools before answering.

ruflo advantages

  1. Self-consistency voting (Track A) — running N attempts per question and taking the majority answer reduces variance on borderline questions. HAL does not implement this.

  2. Hardness routing (Track Q) — routing each question to an appropriate model and turn budget based on predicted difficulty. This reduces cost on easy questions while providing more resources for hard ones.

  3. AgentDB memory — storing patterns across runs enables the agent to recall successful strategies for similar question types.

Improvement roadmap

PriorityChangeExpected LiftEffort
P0Real python_exec sandbox (E2B)+15-25 ppHigh
P0Full 165-Q L1 evaluationAccurate baselineLow
P1Playwright-based web_browse+5-10 ppMedium
P1PDF/XLSX file parser+3-8 ppMedium
P2Increase max-turns to 20 for L2/L3+2-5 ppLow
P2System prompt tuning (iter 30 research)+2-5 ppLow
P3Google Grounding via Gemini (iter 32)+3-7 ppMedium
P3Multi-provider routing (Gemini Flash for cheap Q's)Cost reductionMedium

Loading context from past research

npx @claude-flow/cli@latest memory search \
  --namespace gaia-patterns \
  --query "architecture comparison HAL benchmark"

Storing comparison findings

npx @claude-flow/cli@latest memory store \
  --namespace gaia-patterns \
  --key "architecture-comparison-$(date +%Y%m%d)" \
  --value "HAL gap: 54pp. Primary: python_exec stub. Secondary: browser, file parsing."

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Compare models available through the HuggingFace router with chat-ui configuration, research missing models, and write short English descriptions of their architecture and capabilities. Add entries to both production and development configuration files and commit the changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding newly available router models to chat-ui
  • Writing concise descriptions of model capabilities
  • Updating production and development model entries together
ruvnet/ruflo7.7만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Create an Architecture Decision Record, a document for recording important design choices, with the next sequential number. It generates a Markdown template, registers the record in AgentDB, and links related decisions found through search.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Record the reasoning behind adopting a technology
  • Start an ADR for an API or data model change
  • Document an infrastructure decision
ruvnet/ruflo7.7만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

adr-index

무료

Build a searchable index and relationship graph from ADRs, records of architectural decisions. Import two supported document formats, refresh existing metadata without duplicate relationships, and review summaries of statuses, missing references, and inconsistencies.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Index ADRs imported from another project
  • Refresh a graph that differs from files on disk
  • Set up ADR tracking in an existing codebase
ruvnet/ruflo7.7만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Rebuild the index of ADRs, records of architectural decisions, after files or relationship lines are deleted. It clears stored records and relationships, indexes the files still present, and checks that the final record count matches.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Rebuild the index after deleting an ADR file
  • Remove stale relationships after editing an ADR
  • Reconcile the ADR index on a schedule
ruvnet/ruflo7.7만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Review code changes against accepted Architecture Decision Records, documents that capture agreed design choices. Report violations, outdated references, compliant changes, and areas without ADR coverage, then suggest code fixes or a new decision record where appropriate.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Check a pull request before merging
  • Review major code changes against agreed design decisions
  • Find references to superseded ADRs
ruvnet/ruflo7.7만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Check saved architecture decision records (ADRs) for broken references, circular replacement relationships, and inconsistent statuses. Use the results to verify imported records or stop a CI check when selected integrity rules fail.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking ADR integrity after import
  • Blocking CI when ADR issues are found
  • Reviewing ADR data before a release
ruvnet/ruflo7.7만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

ruvnet의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고