본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

sparc-refine

Review implemented features against their requirements, add missing tests, and check performance constraints. Produce documentation, a table linking requirements to code and tests, and evidence showing whether the feature is ready for deployment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Run the SPARC Refinement and Completion phases — review code, improve test coverage, validate against specification, and generate documentation

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Review an implementation against its specification
  • Add tests for uncovered requirements
  • Link requirements to code and passing tests
  • Prepare documentation and verify deployment readiness

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md8.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

SPARC Refinement + Completion

Run Phases 4 and 5 of the SPARC methodology: iteratively improve through code review and testing, then finalize with validation, documentation, and deployment readiness.

When to use

After the Architecture phase is complete and its gate has been passed. This skill covers the final two phases that bring a feature from implemented to production-ready.

Steps

Phase 4 — Refinement

  1. Retrieve all prior artifacts — call mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_search with namespace sparc-phases and query for the feature slug. Load spec (acceptance criteria), pseudocode, and architecture.

  2. Retrieve phase state — call mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_retrieve with namespace sparc-state and exact key current-phase-{feature-slug} to confirm we are in Phase 4 (or Phase 5 when resuming completion). If status === "complete", report the existing completion and do not write again; stop on missing/malformed state.

  3. Code review — review the implementation against: a. Specification compliance: does every acceptance criterion have a corresponding code path? b. Architecture adherence: do modules follow the defined boundaries and dependency rules? c. Pseudocode fidelity: does the implementation match the designed algorithms? d. Code quality: naming conventions, single responsibility, error handling, no dead code e. Document findings as review comments

  4. Test coverage analysis: a. Run existing tests and measure coverage b. Identify uncovered acceptance criteria c. Write missing tests:

    • Unit tests for each public function
    • Integration tests for cross-module interactions
    • Edge case tests for each identified edge case from the spec d. Target coverage >= 80% on new code
  5. Performance validation — if the spec includes performance constraints: a. Profile critical paths identified in the pseudocode b. Compare measured performance against constraint thresholds c. Optimize if thresholds are not met

  6. Iterate — repeat steps 3-5 until:

    • All acceptance criteria have passing tests
    • Code review has no critical or high-severity issues
    • Coverage meets the threshold
    • Performance constraints are satisfied
  7. Store refinement artifact — call mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_store with namespace sparc-phases, key refine-{feature-slug}, value: { status: "complete", reviewFindings: [...], coveragePercent: N, performanceResults: {...}, iterations: N }

    Before moving to Phase 5, evaluate the Phase 4 gate (passing acceptance tests, approved review, coverage >= 80%) and store its evidence in sparc-gates. On failure preserve phase, increment gateAttempts, refresh updatedAt with the current ISO timestamp at the exact current-phase key, report blockers and stop. On pass preserve existing state fields, set phase 5, phaseName "Completion", status "active", and updatedAt to the current ISO timestamp at the same key in sparc-state. When resuming Phase 5, do not repeat the Phase 4 transition.

  8. Record trajectory step — call mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__hooks_intelligence_trajectory-step with refinement summary

Phase 5 — Completion

  1. Full regression — run the complete test suite to verify no regressions from refinement changes

  2. Traceability matrix — build a matrix mapping every acceptance criterion to:

    • The test(s) that verify it
    • The code file(s) that implement it
    • The current pass/fail status
  3. Documentation: a. Generate API documentation from code comments and type definitions b. Write usage examples for key public interfaces c. Update any existing documentation affected by the changes

  4. Deployment readiness checklist:

    • All tests passing
    • Documentation complete
    • Database migrations prepared (if applicable)
    • Configuration changes documented
    • Feature flags configured (if applicable)
    • Rollback plan defined
    • Security review complete (no secrets, inputs validated)
  5. Evaluate the final Phase 5 gate — completion is allowed only when final gate evidence for every criterion passes: full regression actually ran and passed, documentation is complete, deployment checklist is verified, and traceability links every acceptance criterion to passing tests. Store the actual pass/fail evidence at gate-5-{feature-slug}-{timestamp} in sparc-gates. If evidence is missing, failed, interrupted, or unrun, preserve state and phase, increment gateAttempts, refresh updatedAt to the current ISO timestamp at the exact current-phase key, report blockers and stop. Do not store a complete artifact or complete the state, set completedAt, or train a successful cycle on failure.

    After the final gate passes, store completion artifact — call mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_store with namespace sparc-phases, key complete-{feature-slug}, value: { status: "complete", traceabilityMatrix: [...], documentationFiles: [...], deploymentChecklist: {...}, regressionResult: "pass" }

    Close the workflow — retrieve current-phase-{feature-slug} exactly from sparc-state again and decode it as state. If status === "complete", do not write again or change its timestamps. Otherwise require phase 5 and the successful final gate evidence above; stop on missing/malformed or changed state. Preserve all existing state fields and set now = new Date().toISOString(). Call mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_store with namespace sparc-state and exact key current-phase-{feature-slug}, value { ...state, phase: 5, phaseName: "Completion", status: "complete", completedAt: now, updatedAt: now } once. Keep phase 5, never increment to 6. Report completion only after this write succeeds. A completion artifact alone does not close state; this read/write sequence is not an atomic concurrency guarantee.

  6. End trajectory — call mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__hooks_intelligence_trajectory-end with the full SPARC cycle summary

  7. Train neural patterns — call mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__neural_train with the successful SPARC cycle data to improve future predictions

  8. Store learned pattern — call mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_store with namespace patterns, key sparc-{feature-slug}, value summarizing what worked, phase durations, and common blockers encountered

  9. Present completion report — display the traceability matrix, deployment checklist, and final status. After the final gate and state write succeed, suggest /ruflo-sparc:ruflo-sparc report for the full methodology report. Otherwise show active status and blockers, never a completion claim.

Output format

Success example only: use actual evidence and show completion only after the final gate and state write succeed.

# Refinement: {Feature Name}

## Code Review Summary
- Critical issues: {N} (must be 0 to pass gate)
- High issues: {N}
- Medium issues: {N}
- Resolved: {N}/{total}

## Test Coverage
- Overall: {N}%
- New code: {N}%
- Acceptance criteria covered: {N}/{total}

## Performance
| Constraint | Target | Measured | Status |
|-----------|--------|----------|--------|
| Response time | <200ms | 145ms | Pass |

---

# Completion: {Feature Name}

## Traceability Matrix
| AC | Test | Code | Status |
|----|------|------|--------|
| AC-1 | test_xxx | service.ts:42 | Pass |
| AC-2 | test_yyy | controller.ts:18 | Pass |
| AC-3 | test_zzz | repository.ts:31 | Pass |

## Deployment Checklist
- [x] All tests passing
- [x] Documentation complete
- [x] Migrations prepared
- [x] Config documented
- [x] Rollback plan defined
- [x] Security reviewed

---
SPARC workflow complete. Run `/ruflo-sparc:ruflo-sparc report` for the full methodology report.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Compare models available through the HuggingFace router with chat-ui configuration, research missing models, and write short English descriptions of their architecture and capabilities. Add entries to both production and development configuration files and commit the changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Adding newly available router models to chat-ui
  • Writing concise descriptions of model capabilities
  • Updating production and development model entries together
ruvnet/ruflo7.7만2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Create an Architecture Decision Record, a document for recording important design choices, with the next sequential number. It generates a Markdown template, registers the record in AgentDB, and links related decisions found through search.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Record the reasoning behind adopting a technology
  • Start an ADR for an API or data model change
  • Document an infrastructure decision
ruvnet/ruflo7.7만2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

adr-index

무료

Build a searchable index and relationship graph from ADRs, records of architectural decisions. Import two supported document formats, refresh existing metadata without duplicate relationships, and review summaries of statuses, missing references, and inconsistencies.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Index ADRs imported from another project
  • Refresh a graph that differs from files on disk
  • Set up ADR tracking in an existing codebase
ruvnet/ruflo7.7만2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Rebuild the index of ADRs, records of architectural decisions, after files or relationship lines are deleted. It clears stored records and relationships, indexes the files still present, and checks that the final record count matches.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Rebuild the index after deleting an ADR file
  • Remove stale relationships after editing an ADR
  • Reconcile the ADR index on a schedule
ruvnet/ruflo7.7만2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Review code changes against accepted Architecture Decision Records, documents that capture agreed design choices. Report violations, outdated references, compliant changes, and areas without ADR coverage, then suggest code fixes or a new decision record where appropriate.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Check a pull request before merging
  • Review major code changes against agreed design decisions
  • Find references to superseded ADRs
ruvnet/ruflo7.7만2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Check saved architecture decision records (ADRs) for broken references, circular replacement relationships, and inconsistent statuses. Use the results to verify imported records or stop a CI check when selected integrity rules fail.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking ADR integrity after import
  • Blocking CI when ADR issues are found
  • Reviewing ADR data before a release
ruvnet/ruflo7.7만2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

ruvnet의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고