Plan, design, and implement A/B tests and experiments with statistical rigor. Covers hypothesis frameworks, sample sizing, metrics, and result analysis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Classify and triage security incidents through the full NIST SP 800-61 lifecycle: SEV1-4 severity scoring, false positive filtering, forensic evidence collection, and escalation routing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
실행 점수 미검증
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Full lifecycle incident response from initial triage through forensic collection, severity declaration, and escalation routing. This is NOT threat hunting (see threat-detection) or post-incident review (see incident-commander).
python3 scripts/incident_triage.py --input event.json --classify --false-positive-check --json
The triage tool classifies events into 14 incident types, scores severity, filters false positives, and determines escalation paths.
Exit codes: 0 = SEV3/4 (standard handling), 1 = SEV2 (1-hour bridge), 2 = SEV1 (immediate war room).
| Level | Criteria | Escalation Path |
|---|---|---|
| SEV1 | Confirmed ransomware; active PII exfil >10K records; domain controller breach; CloudTrail disabled | SOC Lead -> CISO -> CEO -> Board |
| SEV2 | Unauthorized access to sensitive systems; credential compromise with priv-esc; lateral movement confirmed | SOC Lead -> CISO |
| SEV3 | Suspected unauthorized access (unconfirmed); malware contained; single account compromise | SOC Lead -> Security Manager |
| SEV4 | Alert with no confirmed impact; policy violation with no data risk | L3 Analyst queue |
Auto-escalation triggers: ransomware note found, active exfiltration confirmed, CloudTrail/SIEM disabled, second system compromised, C-suite account accessed.
Five filters run before escalation: CI/CD agent activity, test environment tagging, scheduled job patterns, whitelisted service accounts, scanner activity. Recurring false positives should be tuned at the detection layer.
Follow DFRWS six-phase framework (Identification -> Preservation -> Collection -> Examination -> Analysis -> Presentation). Collect volatile evidence first (RAM, running processes, network connections) before any containment action.
Chain of custody: SHA-256 hash at acquisition, UTC timestamp, tool provenance, investigator identity, transfer log.
Regulatory notification deadlines (clock starts at incident declaration):
| Framework | Deadline |
|---|---|
| GDPR | 72 hours |
| PCI-DSS v4.0 | 24 hours to acquirer |
| HIPAA (>500 individuals) | 60 days |
| SEC Rule | 4 business days |
| NIS2 | 24-hour early warning; 72-hour notification |
Full deadline reference with penalties: references/regulatory-deadlines.md
→ Read references/playbooks-and-comms.md for the compromised-credentials playbook (GitHub, npm, cloud, app secrets), AI incident classes with their first actions, and the internal, stakeholder and external notification templates
# Classify with false positive filtering
python3 scripts/incident_triage.py --input event.json --classify --false-positive-check --json
# Force severity for tabletop exercises
python3 scripts/incident_triage.py --input event.json --severity sev1 --json
# Read from stdin
echo '{"event_type": "ransomware", "host": "prod-db-01"}' | \
python3 scripts/incident_triage.py --classify --json
Input schema: {"event_type": "...", "host": "...", "user": "...", "source_ip": "...", "timestamp": "...", "raw_payload": {}}
| Skill | Relationship |
|---|---|
| threat-detection | Confirmed hunting findings escalate here for triage |
| cloud-security | Cloud posture findings may trigger incident classification |
| red-team | Red team findings validate detection coverage |
| security-pen-testing | Exploited pen test vulnerabilities escalate for active incident handling |
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Plan, design, and implement A/B tests and experiments with statistical rigor. Covers hypothesis frameworks, sample sizing, metrics, and result analysis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Web/mobile accessibility decision guide: WCAG 2.2 AA, ARIA, keyboard nav, focus management, contrast, testing. Use for: a11y, accessibility, wcag, aria, screen reader, keyboard, contrast.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate, iterate, and scale ad creative for paid advertising across Google, Meta, LinkedIn, and X. Covers platform specs, creative frameworks, and quality validation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Musica interactiva para juegos: layering vertical, re-secuenciacion horizontal, stingers, reglas de transicion con sync points, y mapeo de estados de gameplay a musica. Usar para: musica adaptativa, sistema de musica dinamica, transiciones musicales, combat music.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design multi-agent systems, create agent architectures, define communication patterns, and build autonomous agent workflows with structured evaluation frameworks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Inter-agent communication protocol for C-suite agent teams. Defines invocation syntax, loop prevention, isolation rules, response formats, and quality loops.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.