Analyze test coverage and identify gaps with actionable recommendations
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Unified entry point for creating or updating OpenCode tools (skills, agents, commands) with dependency awareness. Orchestrates the creation of multiple related artifacts in a single session. Use when user says "create opencode tool", "new opencode tool", "oc-tool-dev", or wants to create/update an OpenCode artifact and may need supporting artifacts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
You are initiating the unified OpenCode tool development workflow. This process triages what the user needs, detects dependencies between artifacts, builds an execution plan, and delegates to the existing type-specific skills — reusing their interview flows and generation logic.
IMPORTANT: You MUST use the AskUserQuestion tool for ALL questions to the user. Never ask questions through regular text output.
Text output should only be used for summaries, explanations, and presenting information.
This skill delegates to existing oc-create-* and oc-update-* skills. When executing a tool creation/update:
Read the OpenCode platform overview for general context:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/platform-overview.mdType-specific guides (skill-guide.md, agent-guide.md, command-guide.md) are loaded later by the delegated skill — do not load them here.
Gather high-level requirements through 3 questions using AskUserQuestion.
Question 1 — Action:
Question 2 — Tool Type:
Question 3 — Name & Description:
Ask an additional question to locate the existing artifact:
Question 4 — Locate Artifact:
If "Search workspace": search using the same discovery patterns as the oc-update-* skills:
Glob for .opencode/{type}s/*/SKILL.md (skills) or .opencode/{type}s/*.md (agents/commands)Glob for .claude/{type}s/*/SKILL.md or .claude/{type}s/*.mdGlob for .agents/{type}s/*/SKILL.md or .agents/{type}s/*.mdAskUserQuestion for selectionStore triage results: action, type, name, description, and optionally the artifact path.
Based on the primary tool type, ask targeted dependency questions using AskUserQuestion.
Question 1 — Custom Agent:
If "Yes": ask for the agent name and brief purpose via AskUserQuestion.
Question 2 — Supporting Command:
If "Yes": ask for the command name and brief purpose via AskUserQuestion.
Question 1 — Parent Skill:
If "Yes": ask for the skill name and purpose via AskUserQuestion.
Question 1 — Agent Routing:
If "Yes": ask for the agent name and purpose via AskUserQuestion.
Question — Related Updates:
If "Yes": gather the names and types of related tools.
If the user indicates no dependencies in all questions, skip directly to Phase 4.
Build and present the execution plan as a text summary:
## Tool Creation Plan
### Primary Tool
- **Type**: {Skill | Agent | Command}
- **Name**: {name}
- **Action**: {Create | Update}
- **Purpose**: {brief description}
### Dependencies (processed first)
1. {Type}: {name} — {Create | Update} — {brief purpose}
2. ...
(If no dependencies: "No dependencies — single artifact workflow.")
### Execution Order
1. {first dependency}
2. {second dependency}
3. {primary tool}
Confirm the plan using AskUserQuestion:
If "Modify plan": ask what to change, update the plan, and re-confirm. If "Cancel": stop the workflow and inform the user.
Process each item in the plan, in dependency order (agents before skills, skills before commands that reference them).
Step 1 — Determine the target skill path:
| Action | Type | Skill Path |
|---|---|---|
| Create | Skill | ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/oc-create-skill/SKILL.md |
| Create | Agent | ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/oc-create-agent/SKILL.md |
| Create | Command | ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/oc-create-command/SKILL.md |
| Update | Skill | ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/oc-update-skill/SKILL.md |
| Update | Agent | ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/oc-update-agent/SKILL.md |
| Update | Command | ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/oc-update-command/SKILL.md |
Step 2 — Read the target skill's SKILL.md.
Step 3 — Follow the loaded skill's instructions with these adjustments:
Step 4 — After each artifact completes:
Present a brief completion notice:
✓ {Type} "{name}" — {created | updated} at {path}
Then proceed to the next item in the plan.
After all items are processed, present a final summary:
## Tool Creation Summary
### Artifacts
| # | Type | Name | Action | Path | Validation |
|---|------|------|--------|------|------------|
| 1 | {type} | {name} | {Created/Updated} | {path} | {Pass/Warnings} |
| 2 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
### Dependencies
- {name} (agent) ← used by → {name} (skill)
- {name} (agent) ← routed from → {name} (command)
(If no dependencies: "All artifacts are independent.")
### Invocation
- Skill: `/{skill-name}` in the OpenCode TUI
- Agent: `@{agent-name}` in the TUI or `task({ command: "{agent-name}" })`
- Command: `/{command-name}` in the TUI
CRITICAL: Complete ALL 6 phases before finishing.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Analyze test coverage and identify gaps with actionable recommendations
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze an existing spec for inconsistencies, missing information, ambiguities, and structure issues. Use when user says "analyze spec", "review spec", "spec quality check", "validate requirements", "audit spec", or "check spec quality".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Provides architectural pattern knowledge for designing feature implementations including MVC, event-driven, microservices, and CQRS patterns. Use when designing system architecture or choosing implementation patterns.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Executes diagnostic investigation tasks to test debugging hypotheses. Runs tests, traces execution, checks git history, and reports evidence. (converted from agent)
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic, hypothesis-driven debugging workflow with triage-based track routing. Use when asked to "fix this bug", "debug this", "why is this failing", "this is broken", "investigate this error", "track down this issue", or any debugging situation. Supports --deep flag to force full investigation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic, hypothesis-driven debugging workflow with triage-based track routing. Use for debugging, fixing bugs, and investigating errors.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.